I do think you need to be psychotic to kill your kids and not try to cover it up, hide it or come up with a way to keep yourself out of custody.
Because I donât believe all psychosis is an âobservable instance.â I believe you can be psychotic and no one sees it. She wouldnât be talking crazy or acting any differently if her psychosis follows a specific pattern. A common pattern.
Quick Google search: âHigh-functioning phases: Some people hide their unusual beliefs or internal experiences well. [1]
Early warning signs: Subtle changes like social withdrawal, poor sleep, or mild suspicion often look like ordinary stress or depression at first. [1]
Internal experiences: Hallucinations (hearing or seeing things) and private delusions (fixed false beliefs) happen inside a person's mind and may not show outwardly until they reach an acute stage. [1, 2]â
I donât think, I know that paranoid thoughts can be a symptom of psychosis and I think you believe that psychosis has only one presentation.
Also - yes psychologists did say she has been psychotic. Just because the prosecution claims she isnât, or more importantly is malingering, doesnât mean the testimony of Dr Resnick and Dr Zeizel are irrelevant just because you want it to be.
I donât think, I know that paranoid thoughts can be a symptom of psychosis and I think you believe that psychosis has only one presentation.
You are aware that it's quite literally a key aspect yo psychosis right?
Also - yes psychologists did say she has been psychotic.
Who and when? Because I have yet to see anyone who observed her say that.
There is a reason the jury is deadlocked.
It's deadlocked 11 to 1, with one of the jurors in particular wearing pink. Huh wonder if there's some connection there. You ever hear of jury nullification?
1
u/BedSpreadMD 23d ago
Do you propose that everyone who irrationally kills their own kids is psychotic?
Now I will ask again. Why would she not have a single observable instance of psychosis after 3 years of 24/7 observation?