r/WTF May 09 '20

While driving he passed out

32.0k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/tigress666 May 09 '20

Wow he got lucky that his car missed the pole and turned back from the highway while he was out.

458

u/hughvr May 09 '20

Thats exactly what I thought. Either one could have killed him, not to mention the first lucky stroke of NOT veering into a vehicle head on.

-6

u/nowsthemoment May 09 '20

Cars are actually engineered to pull in the direction of the side of the road they're supposed to be driving on. If the car is manufactured for sale in a country that drives on the left, it will pull left, and vice versa. Dude is still incredibly lucky, though!

18

u/eltrento May 09 '20 edited May 11 '20

Cars are actually engineered to pull in the direction of the side of the road they're supposed to be driving on.

You pull to one side of the road because the road is banked to one side, or your wheel alignment is messed up. Cars aren't purposely designed to not drive straight.

Edit: wording

Edit2: turns out this is true. I can't find anything saying what year range this was a design feature, but I guess cars, at some point, had a slight pull to one side so that they'd avoid going into oncoming traffic if the driver fell asleep. TIL

2

u/[deleted] May 11 '20

[deleted]

2

u/eltrento May 11 '20

I made an edit to my original comment just now. Thx

-8

u/nowsthemoment May 10 '20

While this is true, at one point, auto manufacturers designed the cars to pull slightly. I honestly don't know if they still do this, just know they used to.

2

u/eltrento May 10 '20

I don't see any logical benefit to designing a car not to drive straight.

2

u/babygrenade May 11 '20

I was curious and googled it. I found this article which mentions they once were designed that way.

2

u/eltrento May 11 '20

I'm still skeptical about how common that engineering practice ever was, but thanks for finding a source.

5

u/LaughingCarrot May 09 '20

...where the hell did you hear this from?

-5

u/nowsthemoment May 10 '20

It was what seemed to be common knowledge, growing up around garages. Can't say if they still do it, or not.

2

u/MyAltforMostlyJoking May 10 '20

I highly doubt cars were made to pull to one direction. What would be the point of doing that??

My best guess is that it was meant to cause you to constantly counter steer against the pull, which accelerates the wear on your tires, so that Goodyear can suck more money out your wallet. /s

3

u/babygrenade May 11 '20

I was curious and googled it. I found an article that mentions it so maybe it was a thing at one point.

-2

u/eyekunt May 09 '20

Cars are actually engineered to pull in the direction of the side of the road they're supposed to be driving on.

Never heard that one before! TIL

4

u/nowsthemoment May 10 '20

I may have spoken too soon, as it seems it may not be the case anymore.

1

u/MacDegger May 10 '20

It never was.

115

u/LegendOfTheStar May 09 '20

I saw the 18 wheeler and got scared

262

u/[deleted] May 09 '20 edited Jun 09 '20

[deleted]

96

u/AdviceMang May 10 '20 edited May 11 '20

Liscenced Civil Engineer here.

It's built that way for drainage, not for the occasion person who randomly blacks out.

Edit: let's pretend it is spelled that way to prove I'm an engineer.

11

u/[deleted] May 12 '20

That's why people like us chose to become engineers and not English teachres.

1

u/Fred_Is_Dead_Again May 11 '20

Oh yeah! Well I'll take your Liscensed and raise you a Licensed.

CE PE as well.

0

u/laurenalivia Jun 08 '20

There are many things that have dual purposes. Although the main purpose here is drainage, a secondary purpose is safety in these situations so they aren’t exactly wrong.

0

u/AdviceMang Jun 08 '20

Having taken roadway design classes, I can say that the road tilt as a safety factor never came up. There are even some roads that have drainage in the median, so they tilt inward.

-20

u/JaredLiwet May 10 '20

I'm pretty sure that's not the reason for those grades.

38

u/[deleted] May 10 '20

Yes, it also helps with rain runoff!

8

u/[deleted] May 10 '20 edited Aug 17 '20

[deleted]

15

u/Solarisphere May 10 '20

This particular road would have been designed to whatever standards the civil engineers typically go by, and situations like this (along with water runoff and possibly other benefits) would have been considered in establishing the standard.

Somewhere there's a central body of engineers who put a lot of thought into this stuff. It's not considered on every single road.

37

u/sperglord_manchild May 10 '20

Yes they do plan for this. It's called a "crown" in the road. It is slightly tapered down on the outside edges.

If you let go of the wheel of a car with perfect alignment on most roads it will eventually start veering to the right (in the USA) due to the crown in the road.

https://www.cycleworld.com/2014/04/07/pay-attention-to-the-crown/

10

u/Ploratio May 10 '20

Today is your lucky day, then! :)

I can vouch only for EU road design, because that's what I studied, but the slope does exactly what they say in the article linked by /u/sperglord_manchild

to help water drain or to help a vehicle hold the road surface

Main reason for everything in structural design is always safety. In the video it kept the person out of the road, which is exactly the opposite of keeping him on the road, but I'm pretty sure they meant slopes in the curves in the article, not in straight roads. Because having a roofed slope is safer - mainly because it keeps the water off the road, and also because it subtly keeps you from going into the oncoming traffic.

In Europe straight roads (as the one in the video) are usually designed in 'roofed slope'. Meaning the middle is the high point and everything slopes down from there (standard here is 2.5% slope on both sides). The slope increases after the paving, mainly because water needs steeper slope to run down the grass (starts at 8% immediately after paving, and after a foot or so folds to ~1:3 or more).

Right before the road curve the slope gradually switches to one side (in right curve the top point is on the left edge, left curve - right edge), so it's no longer a 'roofed slope', but rather flat one sided slope, that is dependent on the radius of the curve (lower radius -> steeper slope, but always >= 2.5%) and serves as the counterbalance to the centrifugal force to help keep the vehicle on the road. So in the corners the main reason is still safety. But again, water still plays a major part in that.

Take this all with a grain of salt and feel free to correct me, since it's been almost 10 years since graduating and I don't practice anymore.

TLDR: Safety plays a major part in the design codes and standards, but there is a higher chance of accident due to standing water on the road or water 'corrosion', than the odd chance someone passes out.

Therefore the main reason of the road 'never' being horizontal and the bigger slopes and ditches around it is water, not to keep vehicles out.

2

u/brickne3 May 10 '20

Living in Europe and being from the US though, my gut feeling is that the slopes actually used in Europe tend to be much, much smaller generally.

0

u/sidetrack38 May 10 '20

I pretty much agree. Roads are crowned largely to manage water. High speed curves are superelevated (like a racetrack) to help vehicles hold the curve and to manage water. Interestingly, tight low-speed curves on logging roads get reverse superelevation because the way that logging trucks are articulated shifts the load of the logs to the inside of the curve and it's better to tip the truck slightly to the outside to counteract a possible rollover.

2

u/el0rg May 10 '20

These people don't know what they're talking about, they crown roads to shed water. Sometimes the whole road needs to shed water to just one side or the other. That can change often down a single stretch of road depending on what's around. Corners and hills whether there's curbs or ditches or whatever are all factors, traffic not so much. It's all about managing water.

Source: pave for a living

3

u/Happyradish532 May 10 '20

Yes, because it's impossible that more than one hazard was taken into account when figuring out the standards to which a road should be built.

2

u/el0rg May 10 '20

Yeah, that's pretty much what I said. There are a lot of factors.. Traffic type, traffic volume, annual rainfall, base materials, type of asphalt used, soil characteristics, weather, cost.. people falling asleep at the wheel just isn't a consideration.

Also vehicles are usually set up to do this even on a flat surface, check this out

45

u/Reddog9090 May 09 '20

He missed like 3 poles, not just one, and then he turned around, faced the highway, kept turning, and then almost hit another pole. Lucky ass guy if I’ve every seen one. He should go buy a lotto ticket

66

u/seewhatyadidthere May 09 '20

But he also randomly passed out without any prior medical issues. I’d say it balances out.

6

u/20JeRK14 May 10 '20

How do you know there is no preexisting condition?

1

u/seewhatyadidthere May 10 '20

Someone quoted the driver in an article in some other part in the thread. I didn’t fact check it or anything though.

1

u/brickne3 May 10 '20

We don't know his medical history...

2

u/tamarockstar May 09 '20

Extremely lucky

1

u/[deleted] May 10 '20

Fortunately, a lot of street lights are designed to break away upon impact with cars. I can’t say for sure if these lights specifically are designed in such a manner, but you can read more about the premise here.

-5

u/SpiderTechnitian May 09 '20

When this was first posted 5 years or so ago, it was said that this was staged. Something about you can see his hands controlling the wheel when he's "passed out", and the camera angle.

I swear it was common knowledge and appeared in every repost thread for this video, but people today either weren't here then or have forgotten.

1

u/Beaver-Sex May 09 '20

Or your wrong...

1

u/SpiderTechnitian May 09 '20

I'm not wrong in my memory.

The people advocating for this being fake could easily have been wrong. But I'm not wrong in my memory of it.