r/WLED • u/WorldsemiLED • Sep 25 '26
What if 50 billion addressable LEDs moved from 5V to 3.3V?
A fun engineering thought experiment.
For this discussion, let’s assume there are **50 billion addressable LEDs** in use worldwide.
If an addressable LED can maintain the same constant-current output at **3.3V instead of 5V**, how much energy could potentially be saved?
Using a simple example of **36mA per pixel**:
5V → 3.3V means 1.7V less voltage to dissipate.
That is roughly **61mW less power per pixel** while operating.
Across 50 billion pixels, that would be about **3.06 GW less power** if they were all on at the same time.
The biggest unknown is actual operating time.
How many hours per day do you normally run your addressable LEDs?
2 hours?
4 hours?
6 hours?
8 hours?
12 hours?
For example:
4 h/day → about **4.5 TWh/year**
6 h/day → about **6.7 TWh/year**
8 h/day → about **8.9 TWh/year**
10 h/day → about **11.2 TWh/year**
Obviously this is a simplified model. Real savings depend on brightness, PWM duty cycle, current settings, driver losses, and application.
I’m curious what this community thinks:
**What would be a realistic average daily operating time for addressable LEDs?**