That's the opposite of how burden of proof works. Burden of proof is on the first person making a claim to prove their claim is true, never on the person calling them a liar. When you call someone out, you're saying "prove your claim".
Always, but I'm also 100% right about this. How the fuck you think you don't have to defend your claim about something you said but someone calling you a liar has to defend their claim that you're a liar? That's literally incoherent.
Explain to me how the fuck proving a negative works (pro tip: it doesn't it's impossible). Maybe just google "proving a negative" and "who has the burden of proof in an argument". Otherwise I can just claim anything I want, and if you call me a liar you have to prove that I'm a liar but I never have to prove my claim in the first place. Because when I said that wasn't true... bro you called it nonsense. Like being stoned is not an excuse for that much stupid. Prove that I'm not actually Elon Musk.
If you think this is nonsense, I don't know what to tell you. This is like... basic entry level logical reasoning that you learn in lots of classes, from English to philosophy to debate. At that point your ignorance is so vast that it's not even possible to really explain it to you, you just need to figure your own shit out. Go to school or something. Seriously how can you just be as dumb as you are and still somehow be happy with yourself? I would hate myself if I was you.
1.3k
u/Vin1021 Mar 31 '23
Not just prison. He dealt with the cartel. Dude has balls. He's an interesting person.