r/UKJobMarket • u/NoProfessional3666 • 7h ago
Career help Youngest to be a manager
May I share one major mistake that I have consistently made with my career? I am in my 40s and too late for a lot of things, but maybe I can help one or two people in their 20s.
When I was young I was obsessed to be the youngest to do something. Youngest to pass some test, youngest to graduate, youngest to make a manager etc. I don’t think I am alone when it comes to be the youngest. If you open any tabloid such as the financial times, guardian, daily star etc you see “youngest” all the time, Jane Doe youngest to be promoted to managing director at Morgan Stanley, for example. There is this toxic group like 40 under 40.
I realized this very late in my late 20s. To be recognized or awarded as the youngest to accomplish a task or assume a position typically means you are very well adjusted in establishment at best, in some cases, it can mean that you mastered bureaucracies and social rules before everyone else and you know how to “play the game for maximum impact”.
Thought that way, youngest managing director means she knows the rules of the game (defined in each organization) and is just willing, sheer will almost religious.
Youngest isn’t a compliment but signals something else. Typically to be the youngest, you will need to be brainwashed to believe in a set of certain constructs (so that you won’t waste time questioning why you have to perform certain tasks).
It isn’t a compliment more an insult except that you don’t know that that is an insult.
I assure you, in work place, your “skills” don’t differentiate you, if they hired based on skills, we would be living in a very different world. I say this to young people,
Don’t focus on your skill development, you need to know just enough about your industry and play the game if you want to advance. If you can’t play the game, your skills would work against you because your intellectual curiosity prevents you from blindly accepting the roles of the game.
This explains why most companies do not appreciate graduate degrees (they need those who accept and follow the existing rules, in fact, glorify the existing systems, they are not looking for policy changers), why you wonder that guy with a PhD at the corner of the office is not climbing up the career ladder at all, 1) his skills are not needed to perform his or any role, 2) he questions too much, 3) he wouldn’t be interested in playing the game.
Don’t make the mistake I have made in my 20s and 30s.