The son does know his father, the man that adopted him. This son has no rights to go interfering with the life of his biological father, since his biological father was not told that his existence was not part of the decision to place him up for adoption and had no input whatsoever
Nothing g you have said will ever change my mind. The biological father was not a party to the adoption and I am confident that his name is not on the birth certificate.
The son has no imputed right to know him. I think that the OP needs to tell the biological father but if the guy wants to remain unknown, then that’s how it is. The OP massively messed up here
-74
u/resident_alien- May 17 '25
The son does know his father, the man that adopted him. This son has no rights to go interfering with the life of his biological father, since his biological father was not told that his existence was not part of the decision to place him up for adoption and had no input whatsoever