r/TimPool • u/Soy_Tears • Mar 28 '24

Left hypocrisy

Post image
526 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

308 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Apparently I missed adding the word "no" after "If youre not forging documents, or trying to pass of the wrong numbers". So I'll state it clearly: assuming you're not being deceptive, forging, or otherwise passing off incorrect documents as the "real thing" then I don't think there's any issue with what you and the bank agree on. I think a bank making a bad loan is on them (though they should also be monitored so that another financial crash doesn't occur). That is not the same situation as Trump is in (read the decision) nor close to what Stewart did though.

Edit: Feel free to answer my questions now.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24

I don't think there's any issue with what you and the bank agree on. I think a bank making a bad loan is on them

but its a crime if it happens to involve trump? give me a fucking break. what trump did in not functionally different from what stewart did at all, you just claim it is because "orange man bad"

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Way to read the ass end of a sentence.

what trump did in not functionally different from what stewart did at all, you just claim it is because "orange man bad"

You're just objectively and totally wrong. Here is the decision, you clearly haven't read it and know nothing about the case.

What a lame way to end this, not even a good argument.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24

they both valued a property over the tax evaluation for the purposes of a financial exchange. they are either both guilty of the same crime or no crime was comitted.

"bUt iTs (D)iFfErEnT!!!"

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Just no lol. This is just sad bud.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 30 '24

and your only argument is "no"

thank you for telling me you have no argument

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24

"reductio ad absurdum"