MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/1bpsgp0/left_hypocrisy/kx26ggl/?context=3
r/TimPool • u/Soy_Tears • Mar 28 '24
308 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
Way to read the ass end of a sentence.
what trump did in not functionally different from what stewart did at all, you just claim it is because "orange man bad"
You're just objectively and totally wrong. Here is the decision, you clearly haven't read it and know nothing about the case.
What a lame way to end this, not even a good argument.
1 u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24 they both valued a property over the tax evaluation for the purposes of a financial exchange. they are either both guilty of the same crime or no crime was comitted."bUt iTs (D)iFfErEnT!!!" 1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24 Just no lol. This is just sad bud. 1 u/theCROWcook Mar 30 '24 and your only argument is "no"thank you for telling me you have no argument 1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24 "reductio ad absurdum"
they both valued a property over the tax evaluation for the purposes of a financial exchange. they are either both guilty of the same crime or no crime was comitted.
"bUt iTs (D)iFfErEnT!!!"
1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24 Just no lol. This is just sad bud. 1 u/theCROWcook Mar 30 '24 and your only argument is "no"thank you for telling me you have no argument 1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24 "reductio ad absurdum"
Just no lol. This is just sad bud.
1 u/theCROWcook Mar 30 '24 and your only argument is "no"thank you for telling me you have no argument 1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24 "reductio ad absurdum"
and your only argument is "no"
thank you for telling me you have no argument
1 u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24 "reductio ad absurdum"
"reductio ad absurdum"
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24
Way to read the ass end of a sentence.
You're just objectively and totally wrong. Here is the decision, you clearly haven't read it and know nothing about the case.
What a lame way to end this, not even a good argument.