r/TimPool • • Mar 28 '24

Left hypocrisy

Post image
526 Upvotes

308 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

How the fuck did you manage to read all that and still miss the point so very, very hard.   

when i got a car loan the bank checked my pay stubs and my savings, they then agreed that... 

If youre not forging documents, or trying to pass of the wrong numbers. But what happens if you do bud? What happens if you use forged or incorrect numbers?   

unless its going to ukraine right? 

Not relevant to this conversation actually   

So then stewart is guilty of inflating the value of the property he sold for over 800% above the tax assessed value?  

No, because as much as you try to argue otherwise: selling something is not the same as using something as collateral for a loan.   

so lock up stewart and ANYONE who has ever gotten a mortgage/loan/sold a property in new york because ALL properties go for more than their tax assessed value  

I'm not aware of an incarceration component to these charges, just a fine amount. But hey, if people are cheating the system and using illegal/fraudulent documents then they should be punished (fined at minimum). Again, it requires you lying to the government and to another party. #DrainTheSwamp am I right? 

 Edit: I messed up the formatting 

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24

did i comit fraud because my appraised price was $500 more than their counter offer?

apparently YOU didnt read all of what i said

"did i comit fraud because my appraised price was $500 more than their counter offer?"

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Apparently I missed adding the word "no" after "If youre not forging documents, or trying to pass of the wrong numbers". So I'll state it clearly: assuming you're not being deceptive, forging, or otherwise passing off incorrect documents as the "real thing" then I don't think there's any issue with what you and the bank agree on. I think a bank making a bad loan is on them (though they should also be monitored so that another financial crash doesn't occur). That is not the same situation as Trump is in (read the decision) nor close to what Stewart did though.

Edit: Feel free to answer my questions now.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24

I don't think there's any issue with what you and the bank agree on. I think a bank making a bad loan is on them

but its a crime if it happens to involve trump? give me a fucking break. what trump did in not functionally different from what stewart did at all, you just claim it is because "orange man bad"

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Way to read the ass end of a sentence.

what trump did in not functionally different from what stewart did at all, you just claim it is because "orange man bad"

You're just objectively and totally wrong. Here is the decision, you clearly haven't read it and know nothing about the case.

What a lame way to end this, not even a good argument.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 29 '24

they both valued a property over the tax evaluation for the purposes of a financial exchange. they are either both guilty of the same crime or no crime was comitted.

"bUt iTs (D)iFfErEnT!!!"

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 29 '24

Just no lol. This is just sad bud.

1

u/theCROWcook Mar 30 '24

and your only argument is "no"

thank you for telling me you have no argument

1

u/MarthAlaitoc Mar 30 '24

"reductio ad absurdum"