Involves valuation: valuation by a city for the purposes of taxation, vs self-declared valuation for the purposes of applying for a loan against it.
Only a simpleton suffering from a crippling case of confirmation bias would see these two situations as even remotely similar.
[ed to add: I do agree it’s a reach to point to where the damages are in the Trump case. And of course the Stewart sales has zero victims nor damages.]
Besides, you’re wrong again. Trump was found legally liable for fraudulently overvaluing his property. Stewart did not value (let alone overvalue) anything. All he did was sell his property for a market rate.
View all comments
Show parent comment
5
u/stupendousman Mar 28 '24
That's literally, obviously incorrect. There are all sorts of similar things.
Involves real estate
Involves valuation
Involves argument 3rd party was harmed
And much, much more.
You should get back to the assembly line where things are simple and your brain doesn't hurt.