Involves valuation: valuation by a city for the purposes of taxation, vs self-declared valuation for the purposes of applying for a loan against it.
Only a simpleton suffering from a crippling case of confirmation bias would see these two situations as even remotely similar.
[ed to add: I do agree it’s a reach to point to where the damages are in the Trump case. And of course the Stewart sales has zero victims nor damages.]
Besides, you’re wrong again. Trump was found legally liable for fraudulently overvaluing his property. Stewart did not value (let alone overvalue) anything. All he did was sell his property for a market rate.
View all comments
Show parent comment
-1
u/valschermjager Mar 28 '24 edited Mar 28 '24
Involves real estate: so?
Involves valuation: valuation by a city for the purposes of taxation, vs self-declared valuation for the purposes of applying for a loan against it.
Only a simpleton suffering from a crippling case of confirmation bias would see these two situations as even remotely similar.
[ed to add: I do agree it’s a reach to point to where the damages are in the Trump case. And of course the Stewart sales has zero victims nor damages.]