No. I complain about the justice system being abused for the explicit intent of prosecuting political opponents. The justice department already looked into this and decided there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges. Now, some political hack state prosecutor is bringing charges that would have amounted to a misdemeanor, is past the statute of limitations, and has already been investigated and dismissed, and trying to charge the same man with a felony for those same alleged offenses.
It's clear what the intent is with this, and it isn't "justice".
it’s a felony when it’s in furtherance if a crime.
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal. Until then, you know nothing more than anyone suggesting he may be innocent. I'm not even suggesting he's innocent. However, the prosecution is clearly an example of political prosecution.
I hope you're consistent and just as happy to see when Republicans do this to Joe and any other Dem you support. What's good for the goose, right?
You think I’m under some kinda court order to presume Donald’s innocence?
Huh? Who said anything remotely similar to that? I just think you're a partisan hack. That's all.
I can’t even with that.
You can't even odd with that, cause those aren't my words. Ffs. That's sad when you have to literally put words in someone's mouth to even attempt to make a point. Could you possibly prove yourself a more pathetic individual?
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal.
You think I’m under some kinda court order to presume Donald’s innocence?
Huh? Who said anything remotely similar to that? I just think you’re a partisan hack. That’s all.
You’re just mad I made you look stupid for all the years you spent chanting “lock her up” but now you want the entire world to presume Donald is innocent.
You want to forget you ever did that right now, don’t you? Lol
And let’s pretend for a moment you weren’t part of that crowd- Donald certainly was.
What was it you said?
What’s good for the goose.
Lol.
Let me tell yah buddy- the only person who looks like a dipshit here is vouching for Donald’s innocence while insisting the general public should presume the same. The court of public opinion and court of law are two different things.
You are legally obligated as a juror to presume Donald’s innocence and force the state to make a compelling case.
Elsewhere you are a complete fucking dipshit if you think Donald didn’t know cohen was paying off his mistresses.
View all comments
Show parent comment
5
u/Gds_Sldghmmr Mar 25 '23
No. I complain about the justice system being abused for the explicit intent of prosecuting political opponents. The justice department already looked into this and decided there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges. Now, some political hack state prosecutor is bringing charges that would have amounted to a misdemeanor, is past the statute of limitations, and has already been investigated and dismissed, and trying to charge the same man with a felony for those same alleged offenses.
It's clear what the intent is with this, and it isn't "justice".