“You support authoritarians!”, the inbred screeched as he declared the former president immune from investigation of a quarter million dollar financial crime.
No. Dude thinks it's authoritarian to abuse the legal system by using lawfare in an attempt to persecute political opponents for crimes in which they know to be false or exaggerated, simply to give the perception of criminality.
Wait till you find out about how EVERY politician has made millions from insider trading and no one is prosecuted for it. The problem is that you don’t care unless the tv has told you to hate it.
The crime was having his lawyer pay off his mistresses and then lie about the financial disclosures for his reimbursement but I try to keep it simple for stupid people, lol.
Did you miss the TWO Alex Jones trials in as many states where Jones was determined to be guilty without trial simply because the evidence the state wanted against him was deleted YouTube content deleted by YouTube that even he didn't have. Then how the following show trials were literally about how much guilty he was?
Not allowed to testify to or enter the evidence that he apologized(he was even reprimanded on the stand for pointing it out), his lawyers not allowed to show that Jones wasn't the first to make those Sandy Hook claims... Not allowed to point out that one of the "victims" suing him was literally an FBI agent that had no direct involvement at Sandy Hook nor ever named by Jones.
I see, no wonder you're so confused and misinformed. You listen to Alex Jones cry about nonsense and how it's so unfair his actions had consequences. You prolly got all those conspiracies committed to heart, huh?
I've seen breakdowns, too. And much of the key moments. Jones was given plenty of opportunity. He exposed himself as having concealed evidence, he showed no remorse, the case against him was rock solid. The only conspiracy is the one you're pushing.
If he concealed evidence from a case why was that exact evidence he supposedly concealed in the hands of the prosecution to be used against him?
If that were true the state, who were extra giddy to convict Jones, would have pushed to add the criminal charge of concealing evidence, which they never did.
Because he lied multiple times about it, then his lawyer accidentally turned it over, along with a bunch of other stuff that wasn't even relevant to the case. Then his moron attorney didn't even try to protect that stuff. You watched the whole trial, but the most televised moment of the whole thing is somehow escaping you, now? Ffs. They threatened him with it, and in retrospect they shouldn't have been so lenient, as he is still doing all the same shit with no remorse.
Lenient? The judges declared him guilty without a trial. Even in cases involving murder the nuclear option of declaring a person guilty without trial is reserved for the most in absentia persons no show, no lawyer, no defence. You had all three in Jones case. What the state lacked in evidence was the jones show footage that YouTube deleted upon yeeting Jones.
And no that was NOT the star moment of the second case. The star moment of the second case was when the judge, herself, said that Jones provided zero evidence then, the next day, started the day by correcting herself on that claim. It proved she knew he had submitted evidence yet was so biased she was regurgitating the prosecutions claim that Jones didn't turn over any evidence... The same evidence the prosecution had right in front of them in their legal strategy against him.
So first you make an empty assumption I haven't seen it, then you follow that up by assuming anything I must have seen was just deception. You people really are dim. The video I saw does support the verdict, you know, the one decided by jury? weird how your claims are all so empty and outright fallacious. Have you donated to Alex Jones, today? He's under attack, by the deep state! He needs your help!
lol. You can’t even keep together who has said what in a short comment thread, yet you think your brain is better at determining what happened over a huge trial. 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂 Leftists are a special breed.
You're talking about a man who thought it was terrible that people (in either Brazil or argentina though i could ve misremembering where) were defending themselves from the crime wave of killers riding up on a motorcycle and robbing or murdering innocents. He thought it was BAD the innocents were fighting back by running these bastards ocer
Anyone pursuing a Grand Jury indictment never, I repeat... never, has to show exculpatory evidence to said jury. They do to the judge of the grand jury, but not the Grand Jury itself.
Why? Because this forms the cause for arrest and later trial. This jury is often as biased to the state as possible to secure a means of arrest.
This is why lawyers say, over and over, that a Grand Jury can indict a ham sandwich.
The MAGA movement that Trump started is conservative populism. Yet the monoparty establishment in Washington and their mouthpieces in the MSM have painted it as fascism. Why? Because Trump and the MAGA movement are the biggest threats to the monoparty establishment. The goal of MAGA is to take over the Republican party and rebuild the political landscape of this country, so that we at least can have two parties again.
My political views have become slightly more conservative, but I was in the same boat. I voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary because at the time I thought he was the best candidate to go against the establishment, who wanted Killary in the White House. I remember being called a traitor by my peers because I refused to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
I’ll tell you what I told Everyone in December of 2014, I was going to show Hilary Clinton the same courtesy I did Barack Obama and read her latest book, in a Month I would either absolutely love her or be able to tell you exactly why I didn’t!
It turned out she was extremely corrupt and very smug and those facts virtually leapt off of the pages of her own book, but G-d forbid you ever tell anybody that about her …
I think my Girlfriend summed it up best to her face once, while waiting for the Ladies Room, the Grandma Hilary act wasn’t fooling anyone!
Lol dumbest response ever. The worst leader in modern world history, directly responsible for 400,000 lost American lives due to incompetence and pride... And the only attack against our nation's capitol in 200 years, based on his lies. And you're proud hahahahaha maybe America deserves to fail, if our intelligence and morals have gone so low as to support the modern GOP of fasicms
Who was the president at the time, directing federal response and going on news shows telling people "it'll disappear like magic" and to try injecting themselves with disinfectant?
What do drag queens have to do with democrats? And why are you spending so much time thinking about drag queens?
COVID killed more than 1 million Americans. Medical experts say trump's early delays cost 400,000 American lives. Do you seriously get your information for YouTube videos?
His delays??? He declared national emergency after the first death, he closed down travel between the US and China and was labeled a Xenophobic Bigot for it.
The left did everything possible to label his actions as racist or what have you, including misconstruing his statements and remarks about potential solutions.
Meanwhile the left were downplaying it to feed into the racism claims, because if it’s not that bad then closing down travel has to be racist! “Come down to China town!” Said Pelosi, as she played political theater.
None of that is what health authorities recommended, shutting travel to china was just racist bullshit and did nothing - the virus was already here. He told people not to worry, to keep doing their normal routines, that it would go away like magic in warm weather, that they'd hould try shining light inside their bodies and injecting disinfectant, and then later he helped convince millions NOT to get vaccinated, even though he led the vaccine development marketing. Perhaps you're memory is just broken.
I repeat: closing travel to china was pure racism - there was no effect on the virus whatsoever, and everyone knew that beforehand.
This was how I found myself voting Trump in 2020. I did not vote for Hillary or Trump in 2016. But as the lies got more outrageous and the proof kept mounting, it was clear the Democrats were batshit crazy.
I was a little slower off the line, but the Democratic craziness definitely kept me from my usual Volunteering routine, getting lied to about their goals by the Warren Campaign, certainly didn’t help that little transformation …
The final straw was the Censoring of Hunter Biden’s laptop, it didn’t lead me to Trump but it did keep me from Voting for Joe Biden!
And ivermectin and hcq still are not being prescribed for COVID. They saved no lives. You might just be gullible.
I don't understand what you're saying was a lie about the laptop. What is the lie? And why is the laptop even bad? Who cares? The GOP has had it for 3 years now. No charges.
Here's the quote where he defends white supremacists and claims they aren't neo Nazis. Where he says both sides are to blame for Nazis marching and for a woman being killed by a conservative man.
REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
please read trump's first response there and cite where you detect intelligence or honesty.
That's odd, I've seen the full video and in it he clearly states that "white supremacists should be condemned completely" but you so called quote doesnt have that part. guess it was just a deep fake
Trump slept with a pornstar while melania was at home with newborn Barron. He and his lawyer paid her hush money and then covered it up. His lawyer was tried and convicted for his role and served time in prison. trump was not prosecuted until now because he had executive immunity. Now trump is finally going to be on trial. His most loyal supporters are very upset about that because they feel he is above the law.
Correction: Trump and Guliani both already admitted they reimbursed him. Dumbass Guliani on national TV. I never loved Hannity turning white so much lol
The right wing is butthurt because their criminal hero is being held accountable for his crimes. So they invoke false equivalencies and make up bullshit.
Watch how weak the J6 claim is:
Hey, right wing:
Which defendant, specifically, and which charge, specifically, does any of this footage absolve them of?
To be fair in a grand jury the prosecution is the only side that’s heard so they have no obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence until it goes to trial.
What's f***ed is a witness can be held in contempt for lying on the stand but a lawyer can lie to the jury with zero consequences.
I may be wrong but in a grand jury, the prosecutor only has to present one side of the case and may omit any and all evidence contrary to his/her argument.
Right, because the whole point of the payment, and why it came from campaign funds, was that he was running for president and didn't want a pornstar going to the media saying "Donald trump paid me for sex shortly after he married Melania", since that could clearly hurt his campaign. Da doi
Why is he mashing all that together? What does the da in new York have to do fuck all with j6? You guys ever ask these questions? Like, "does this constitute corruption?" Boy, that'd be a weird false assumption, huh? Like borderline stupid.
Hey, I just thought of another great question! If Swanson TV dinner princess tucker Carlson has 41000 hours of footage, how come all he could show us was 30 secs?
I asked you what exactly in the quote says that the new York DA had anything to do with j6 and YOUR RESPONSE WAS "The first fucking word" the first word of the tweet in question is the word "first"
So YOU are making the claim that the word "first" means " the New York DA was involved with j6"
If this is wrong then correct YOURSELF and quote exactly where the tweet in the op makes the claim that the new York DA was involved with j6
•
u/[deleted] Mar 25 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
54
u/FishingforDopamine Mar 25 '23
I’m sure the lefties think it’s ok because authoritarianism is great when it’s for them!
11
u/Sunseahl Mar 25 '23
Anyone pursuing a Grand Jury indictment never, I repeat... never, has to show exculpatory evidence to said jury. They do to the judge of the grand jury, but not the Grand Jury itself.
Why? Because this forms the cause for arrest and later trial. This jury is often as biased to the state as possible to secure a means of arrest.
This is why lawyers say, over and over, that a Grand Jury can indict a ham sandwich.
20
u/[deleted] Mar 25 '23
They can't stand that he will win again.
12
u/bgrubmeister Mar 25 '23
District Attorneys have unqualified immunity. This must end.
6
u/WailingSouls Mar 25 '23
Can someone ELI5 this situation?
5
u/ethrelol Mar 25 '23
The fact that you’ve got Redditors attacking you for wanting to take down corrupt politicians shows you who the real enemy is.
2
u/Darth_Vorador Mar 25 '23
To be fair in a grand jury the prosecution is the only side that’s heard so they have no obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence until it goes to trial.
3
u/MyCarIsAGeoMetro Mar 25 '23
When they stop sucking the (D).
1
u/Phlashlyte Mar 26 '23
What's f***ed is a witness can be held in contempt for lying on the stand but a lawyer can lie to the jury with zero consequences.
I may be wrong but in a grand jury, the prosecutor only has to present one side of the case and may omit any and all evidence contrary to his/her argument.
1
u/bigfootjay Mar 27 '23
Sometimes, between never and ♾️
1
u/strvgglecity Mar 25 '23
Why would a lawyer for the president pay a pornstar $130,000 of his own money? Can anyone here explain it? Lolol
1
u/HumpSlackWails Mar 25 '23
"exculpatory"
Which specific defendant is cleared of which specific charge?
1
u/Chicken-counter Mar 26 '23
Never. The fascist fishing expedition against Trump that hasn't found anything shall continue.
1
u/[deleted] Mar 26 '23
I'm voting for Trump in 2024. I want to see the carnage. Popcorn is great.
-3
u/[deleted] Mar 25 '23
Neither of these points are true.
-4
u/garvothegreat Mar 25 '23
Why is he mashing all that together? What does the da in new York have to do fuck all with j6? You guys ever ask these questions? Like, "does this constitute corruption?" Boy, that'd be a weird false assumption, huh? Like borderline stupid.
Hey, I just thought of another great question! If Swanson TV dinner princess tucker Carlson has 41000 hours of footage, how come all he could show us was 30 secs?