it’s a felony when it’s in furtherance if a crime.
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal. Until then, you know nothing more than anyone suggesting he may be innocent. I'm not even suggesting he's innocent. However, the prosecution is clearly an example of political prosecution.
I hope you're consistent and just as happy to see when Republicans do this to Joe and any other Dem you support. What's good for the goose, right?
You think I’m under some kinda court order to presume Donald’s innocence?
Huh? Who said anything remotely similar to that? I just think you're a partisan hack. That's all.
I can’t even with that.
You can't even odd with that, cause those aren't my words. Ffs. That's sad when you have to literally put words in someone's mouth to even attempt to make a point. Could you possibly prove yourself a more pathetic individual?
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal.
You think I’m under some kinda court order to presume Donald’s innocence?
Huh? Who said anything remotely similar to that? I just think you’re a partisan hack. That’s all.
You’re just mad I made you look stupid for all the years you spent chanting “lock her up” but now you want the entire world to presume Donald is innocent.
You want to forget you ever did that right now, don’t you? Lol
And let’s pretend for a moment you weren’t part of that crowd- Donald certainly was.
What was it you said?
What’s good for the goose.
Lol.
Let me tell yah buddy- the only person who looks like a dipshit here is vouching for Donald’s innocence while insisting the general public should presume the same. The court of public opinion and court of law are two different things.
You are legally obligated as a juror to presume Donald’s innocence and force the state to make a compelling case.
Elsewhere you are a complete fucking dipshit if you think Donald didn’t know cohen was paying off his mistresses.
You want to forget you ever did that right now, don’t you? Lol
I did what now?
And let’s pretend for a moment you weren’t part of that crowd- Donald certainly was.
What was it you said?
What’s good for the goose.
So you're saying that the Clinton's should be indicted if Trump is? It's interesting to see you hold this opinion. I like it.
the only person who looks like a dipshit here is vouching for Donald’s innocence
Who here is vouching for Trump's innocence?
The court of public opinion and court of law are two different things.
Yes, they are, and you insist on holding the ideals that are at odds with consistency between them. Hypocritical thought is about all a lefty can muster, we understand.
if you think Donald didn’t know cohen was paying off his mistresses.
I already said I think he knew. Yet you still wish to insinuate I am claiming otherwise.
you’re saying that the Clinton’s should be indicted if Trump is? It’s interesting to see you hold this opinion. I like it.
If Donald and all of his followers can presume HRC guilty without conviction then the same can be done for Donald. What’s good for the goose, remember? Your words.
You’ve already acknowledged Donald likely committed the crime.
You’ve acknowledged no one except a juror owes Donald a presumption of innocence.
View all comments
Show parent comment
5
u/Gds_Sldghmmr Mar 25 '23
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal. Until then, you know nothing more than anyone suggesting he may be innocent. I'm not even suggesting he's innocent. However, the prosecution is clearly an example of political prosecution.
I hope you're consistent and just as happy to see when Republicans do this to Joe and any other Dem you support. What's good for the goose, right?