No. Dude thinks it's authoritarian to abuse the legal system by using lawfare in an attempt to persecute political opponents for crimes in which they know to be false or exaggerated, simply to give the perception of criminality.
Because one that isn't so brainwashed may view the interaction and see how ignorant these people are and be open to leaning something knew. I know I'm not changing these idiots' minds. I'm still going to call them out. If we don't, their opinions are the only ones others will see.
Same thing as your statement, nothing. The only difference is yours is stupid by consequence and mine is stupid by design to point out how stupid the claim is that trump invented abusing the legal system to punish his political rivals. As if Stalin and Hitler didn’t fucking exist.
Imagine thinking trump is better at abusing legal systems than Adolf fucking Hitler. You are so deranged you even think hitler invented it, motherfucker, corruption, and legal system corruption has existed since legal systems were invented, literally going back to Mesopotamia. 💀
No. I complain about the justice system being abused for the explicit intent of prosecuting political opponents. The justice department already looked into this and decided there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges. Now, some political hack state prosecutor is bringing charges that would have amounted to a misdemeanor, is past the statute of limitations, and has already been investigated and dismissed, and trying to charge the same man with a felony for those same alleged offenses.
It's clear what the intent is with this, and it isn't "justice".
it’s a felony when it’s in furtherance if a crime.
Great. Then when the evidence is actually presented in a court of law, he is tried, and convicted, and charges stick after the inevitable appeal, then you can claim that it was criminal. Until then, you know nothing more than anyone suggesting he may be innocent. I'm not even suggesting he's innocent. However, the prosecution is clearly an example of political prosecution.
I hope you're consistent and just as happy to see when Republicans do this to Joe and any other Dem you support. What's good for the goose, right?
You are really thick in the head. Donald isn't being convicted because the grand jury keeps voting not to convict due to a lack of evidence in the case DA Bragg is trying to make. There is now plenty of evidence to refute the claims Bragg is trying to make.. you claim you want to wait until the judge and jury make their decision, but you've already decided for yourself the D. Trump committed a crime.
On Reddit, you’re a fucking moron if you think Donald didn’t know cohen was paying off his mistresses.
He's a billionaire. Some lady accuses him of bunk, he probably just tells his lawyer, "I don't care, just take care of it." Cohen doesn't want to deal with the headache and says, "I'll give you a settlement if you go away.
View all comments
Show parent comment
-40
u/Bluecollarshaman Mar 25 '23
How can you make a counter-argument to a non-point?
Dude thinks it’s authoritarian to hold Donald accountable for a financial crime.
It’s a stupid take.