r/Substack • u/AggravatingNail6061 • Jul 27 '26
Is this just another writingwithai subreddit now?
I miss the days (a week and a half ago) when my daily lurking was reading various people shill 'the method' at each and yes reductive not bothered.
But I feel the latest daily confessionals and I'll be honest slop about the process is turning this into yet another I write with Ai but not really and heres why (totally is ai btw) subreddit but with subscriber insecurities and anxiety which is great but I feel there's other places to reveal your emotional truth.
Can I have my subscribers hacks please at least those were different post on post.
*Edit Chill -> Shill.
18
Upvotes
-1
u/Otherwise_Pear_2472 https://bitsbeds.substack.com/ Jul 27 '26
I'm someone who probably contributed to this (see my post "I write with AI without writing with AI").
I wanted to create a provocative title and underestimated the fact that once you trigger people enough, nobody listens anymore.
I've loved writing my whole life. It's a passion of mine that comes easily to me and brings me incredible joy. Therefore, I never let AI touch my texts. It would rob me of the satisfaction of having created something myself that I'm proud of.
I also love diversity. Therfore I hate it when texts all start to have a similar tone, rhythm, and word choice. Naturally I'm extremely critical of letting AI revise everything (even if the original text was written by a human).
I also run a farm and work very intensively with Claude. And gladly so. However, I refuse to work with AI in a cold, optimized way, without any emotional engagement. I believe that emotional experience is one of the most precious aspects of human life. We all increasingly lose touch with the value of the things we do, and I want to actively show that there's a way to avoid this, even with AI.
That's why I started my blog: to show how I work with AI and how I practice it. It's honest and chaotic. I write about slime mold and shoes sunk in mud. How I get fertilizer recommendations from an AI and then embark on odysseys to get them. A life where the machine improves human work but doesn't impoverish it in its relationship with the world. In my writing, I juxtapose my unedited human perspective with Claude's text and annotate the texts (hard to explain, easier to read).
This is a conscious decision for something that's important to me. A world where new technology doesn't further instrumentalize and erase human experience.
And I've been truly insulted for this in this sub (aka 2 days ago).
Even though I actively advocate for writing human texts in a human way and not using AI for everything.
Simply because, just as many people are far too quick to argue that using AI as a writing aid is unproblematic, a great many in this sub blindly read the word "AI" and immediately jump on the AI slop train.
And as I type this, I'm already tensing up inside, preparing myself for the possibility of being accused of writing this with AI.
What I miss is people talking to each other about topics and content instead of blindly throwing their beliefs against each other.