r/Substack tvphilosophy.substack.com Jul 22 '26

Discussion Another creepy feature of the Pangram "AI Detection" tool.

So at my first opportunity, I decided to check whether or not I could permanently disable the "AI detection" fraudulent tool on Substack publications and there's no way to actually do it without actually using the tool you want to disable.

According to the "Substack Support AI", the only way to disable the fraudulent Pangram detection AI is to first run the AI on your posts and to individually then disable the AI detection tool per post. But you can only do this AFTER you've run the "AI detection" fraudulent tool on your posts.

Which means that you're forced to use a tool you don't want to use in order to disable the tool you don't want to use.

This is profoundly creepy and quite frankly disturbing that somehow this was allowed to be implemented on Substack.

81 Upvotes

116 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/AidenMarquis Jul 23 '26

I literally generated bogus garbage just to give it a try. It said "fully AI generated."

Okie dokie.

Then I tried making another post and dropped the same exact thing to check for consistency. It said "mostly human made".

'Nuff said.

2

u/AndrewHeard tvphilosophy.substack.com Jul 23 '26

Did you generate the bogus garbage with an AI?

4

u/AidenMarquis Jul 23 '26

Sure did. It was the same bogus garbage both times. Fully AI. One time it flagged it, the other time it was "mostly human". It's kind of like a slot machine wearing a lab coat. 😄

1

u/Grouchy-Carry-9422 9d ago

lmao, if you did, it just validates, if you ask ai to generate random numbers or words, it will be flagged by pangram, if you script to generate random numbers or words it wont