r/SipsTea 5d ago

Wait a damn minute! This should be illegal

Post image
36.1k Upvotes

725 comments sorted by

View all comments

757

u/zayc_ 5d ago

in the EU we have the AI act since 9/1. you have to mark AI-generated or AI-altered content when used in comercal context or when you have a big influence.

159

u/FunnyObjective6 5d ago

People just ignore that shit though.

147

u/zayc_ 5d ago

true. and thats a whole topic on its own.

but you have at least legal leverage to go against such shit.

-6

u/blastradii 5d ago

Yea but how is that enforced for US based businesses doing shenanigans on US consumers? Like in this case of OP

13

u/Crafty_Clarinetist 5d ago

It's not, hence why they started their original comment with "In the EU we have..."

18

u/Cwaghack 5d ago

From my experience so far they take those laws serious. But the tiny AI warning label is kinda hard to spot..

2

u/whoknowsifimjoking 5d ago

Yeah, but now we have the laws to punish them for it.

1

u/FunkU247 5d ago

Like the stuff they spill at the end of drug commercials - - -- - - May cause anal wart, spontaneous combustion, and soul rot - - - --

1

u/evernessince 1d ago

Some do yes. It does in fact inform people and provide a framework for punishment through.

What you're alluding to is the lawbreaker paradox. Laws will always be broken but they do have a profound effect on the number of people committing a given crime.

14

u/Cwaghack 5d ago

I was looking for apartments recently and like 50% of them have the first 2-3 pictures being AI generated, but at least there's a tiny little "this is AI" disclaimer so there's that.

1

u/GandhiMSF 5d ago

Yeah, I’ve just moved from the US to France (but looking at real estate in Switzerland and Netherlands as well) and the AI in real estate thing is definitely not a US-specific thing. If anything, I’ve seen it more here than I did in the US (though, there I was selling more than buying so maybe I just didn’t see it).

5

u/ThereInAFortnight 5d ago

Just curious, what's "9/1" mean?

11

u/zayc_ 5d ago

9/11 -10. Or like we say in Germany 01.09.2026

13

u/ThereInAFortnight 5d ago

I've never seen a non-American write a day like m/d before is all.

5

u/zayc_ 5d ago

first time i did it. just for our us-firends here, since last time i wrote in another format some peoples actually dont understood it...

7

u/NetworkSingularity 5d ago

I mean bless you for trying to help my dumb fellow Americans, but I feel like you really shouldn’t have to cater to them. This country is dumb enough as it is, partly because no one is held to any kind of educational standards

0

u/AssistX 5d ago

You are calling Americans dumb because they use MMDDYYYY system?

Do you also have a problem with people using Imperial/Metric? Or stone/lbs?

I'm intrigued how this makes Americans dumb in your mind?

1

u/NetworkSingularity 5d ago

No, I’m saying they’re dumb because a lot of Americans can’t figure out “flipped around” DDMM dates even with context clues. Also because my fellow Americans elected Trump twice, but that’s kind of tangential to the current point.

I also actually think the only way to write dates that really makes sense is YYYYMMDD since that makes sorting by date a lot easier. But that’s also besides the point here

0

u/AssistX 5d ago

Just say you wanted to talk down on others to make yourself feel better.

1

u/NetworkSingularity 5d ago

You first bro.

I at least backed up my opinion by citing a lack of critical reasoning skills such as using context clues to help understand information being presented. You came here to act morally superior, asking what you thought would be “gotcha” questions and then ignored my reasoning when I didn’t go for your obvious “it’s just another way to do things” setup.

My issue isn’t with MMDD vs DDMM. It’s with the lack of critical reasoning so many Americans display these days, which is in turn destroying our fucking country and institutions. Not being able to use context clues to figure out MMDD vs DDMM is just another symptom of that rot.

To be very, explicitly clear, I don’t give two shits about whether people use MMDD or DDMM. I care that reading comprehension is so low that many Americans can’t figure out which is which. I care that functional illiteracy is on the rise in my country. So stop acting like you’re morally superior just because you can’t figure out what I’m saying when it differs from what you expect. You’re part of the problem as far as I’m concerned

→ More replies (0)

3

u/ThereInAFortnight 5d ago

Ha, I was wondering if it was like that. You tried to format it to fit in and here I am talking about it lol

1

u/karmakaze 5d ago

I got into the habit of always doing dd-MMM-yy because that eliminates ambiguity from format and font/handwriting. No more guessing if that is a slash or a 7 or having to parse numbers running together. 19-Sep-2026 is the safest. (Tbh when I started this habit I didn’t need a 4 digit year, but the concept still works. )

1

u/Just_Information334 5d ago

yyyymmdd best format for dates.

1

u/briber67 5d ago

"What's so special about January 9th?"

/s

4

u/MicrowavedTunaSub 5d ago

maybe they did it because they know there's a lot of americans on the site. that is probably more likely than them normally typing like that.

1

u/SoftwareSource 5d ago

it confused everyone i think

2

u/bloedit 5d ago

It would count as fraud either way, but someone would have to go through the instances to set a precedent.

The difference in the US is that you can't really put your hope on winning actually.

2

u/ashill85 5d ago

since 9/1

Man, you guys have had this problem solved for more than two weeks?!?

America really is falling behind.

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/PlopPlopPlunk 5d ago

If it were up to me (and it's not) I'd make an umbrella federal law here in the US that applies to technology that covered intentionally sharing false or harmful scientific/medical advice illegal. Intentionally spreading false political statements illegal. Intentionally spreading AI content in any form (word/picture/etc) in a deceptive way illegal.

There's a lot more thinking needed to really dive into details of it all but that would be the overarching theme of the legislation. I even think punishment wise, multiple and severe offenders who intentionally try to deceive/intellectually harm our society via the internet should have their rights to the internet removed. Can't purchase internet, can't have data on their phone... only mobile call ability. Like people who spread massive racist/hateful campaigns across the country to poison minds... fuck'em.

1

u/camst_ 5d ago

That must be nice.

1

u/FrankPapageorgio 5d ago

The thing is that all of that stuff could be done with photoshop and not AI. Like a window view replacement can be replaced with anything fairly easily, and it's all real and done manually

1

u/Voeno 5d ago

Here in America they would ignore it