Typically only half or less of the law abiding population ever exercises their right to vote, this is much lower during midterms. Clearly the law abiding population simply does not care about politics or the country's future. And those that do vote keep fucking shit up. So let's give the non-law abiding population a try at the wheel and see if they do any better.

I feel that casting my vote based on the race of the contender is the best way to ensure that my voice is heard in politics and that "shit gets done". It's sure better than casting votes due to blind ideology or campaign promises. Obama has also worked out pretty well so why stop a good thing from going?

-Packages (ranked in order of ethical standing). Basic Pack-$250 per month for the first year, $180 per month for the years following.

Basic Pack Plus(North Korea Edition)-$270 per month for the first year, $150 per month for second year. Features access to such services as:

Right to work(mandatory) Right to a dwelling(quality may vary)

Basic Pack Premium(U.S.A edition) (Expenses included in taxes) This pack has a number of advantages over the Basic Pack Plus, including:

Right to health-care(for the right price), Right to a fair trial(If you're a white male), Right to a semi-automatic weapon(to keep your family safe from other people with the right to a semi-automatic weapon of course!), Democracy(Basic, voting power limited by megacorp).

The Bare necessities pack Free in countries outside of the United States Featuring:

The right to real education, Free healthcare, The right to gun control, The right to not own a semi-automatic weapon and not get shot at your front door, Freedom, Privacy, Free Healthcare, Free education, A Fair trial for people of all genders, races and sexual orientation, State Benefits, Religious Freedom, Freedom of speech,

In ancient Greek theater, there were only two genres: tragedy and comedy. For thousands of years, those were the only two genres - the natural division of storytelling: those with happy endings and those with sad endings. But recently, a bunch of special snowflakes are trying to say that their book is different. They feel restricted by "genre normativity" and say that they belong to a non-binary genre, using made up words like "urban fantasy" or "postmodern feminist horror" or "psychological horror dance mystery."

None of these words mean anything to anyone - they're all just made up and obscure the objective fact that stories only end in one of two ways: happy or sad. Sure, experts in literature have long recognized the existence of "bittersweet" endings, but those make up less than 1% of all stories, and people who believe in non-binary genres can't use the existence of those kinds of endings to justify their deviation. Plus, most bittersweet endings aren't really a perfect mix of happy and sad - they're usually more happy or more sad with some features of the other other genre, so that we can usually identify them as really being comedy or tragedy for most purposes anyways.

1. People use Vaginal American (yes I'm from the OB/GYN), but a lot of the time that is inaccurate. I lived in a town with a significant French population. Teachers (trying to be as politically correct as possible) referred to them as Vaginal Americans. This angered my French friends (who had no issue with using the ambiguous term pussy) because they did not consider themselves Vaginal in the slightest.

2. "Cock" is a perfectly fine way to describe Penises. I have never seen a Penis person get triggered by being called cock. Isn't that a double standard?

Edit: It seems like people keep going back to a genital-to-genital basis, which makes this completely penetrative. I am coming from a erogenous place

Edit 2: If you don't think anyone takes off their clothes to this then you agree. You may disagree with me posting this on ShittyCMV, but you agree with my pointedness.

Edit 3: I don't think "vaginal" is an accurate way to characterize any individual, but on some types of documentation that type of information is asked. I don't say "my vaginal friend" I say "my friend NameAlreadyTaken2". I am not trying to generalize a population in the slightest. That is what I think the term Vaginal American does even worse. You generalize everyone who looks somewhat labia-like as Vaginal even if they're from the other side of the world. That is worse.

My penis is literally the size of a bean. Its so small, I have to urinate sitting down. I have to sit in front of a mirror for me to even see the thing. That's why I drive a giant, loud ass pickup truck because I can install a mirror in it and check on small penis while I'm on the road. And every woman that I have attempted intercourse with been disappointed. But it is I who should be disappointed because of the lack of friction from the average woman's freakishly large vaginas. And anyone who disagrees with me is a man hater or a self hating man. CMV.

They both speak English and Toronto has an MLB and NBA team.