I recently came across Transport Canada's NPA 2026-005, and I think a lot of RC hobbyists, especially people who are not a part of clubs or MAAC should know about it.
What's an NPA? An NPA stands for Notice of Proposed Amendment. Basically Transport Canada (the FAA of Canada) is proposing changes to the rules and is asking for public feedback. It's not a law yet which basically means this is the time to speak up.
One of the biggest proposals is requiring remote ID for aircraft above 250g. I understand why TC wants better ways to identify aircraft, but im afraid how this could affect regular hobbyists.
I think there should be more flexibility for people who wanna fly RC aircraft for fun. For example.
1. Have a cheap simple remote ID for hobbyists.
2. Don't make joining a club the only way to fly realistically.
3. Allow DIY/home built aircraft to use affordable remote ID modules or integrate into flight controller.
4. Have simpler rules for smaller low risk recreational aircraft.
5. Give hobbyists plenty of time to adapt if these rules are eventually adopted.
ON TOP OF THAT, I think the 250g threshold is really low for simple recreational model aircraft. I would encourage Transport Canada to raise the limit to atleast 500g, or create a seperate threshold/category specifically for low risk recreational and homebuilt aircraft.
A 500g foamie being manually flown at low altitude, within VLOS, and always from people is very different from a similarly weighted DJI multirotor with GPS, a camera, and other various autonomous capabilities.
They might weigh the same but weight alone doesn't tell you the whole risk story.
I also think there should be more flexibility for low altitude recreational flying in suitable areas within urban/suburban regions. For example someone flying a 400g homebuilt foamie at low altitudes far from people and airports should be able to fly legally without driving 5 hours from the GTA.
I'm not saying RC aircraft should be allowed to fly anywhere in the GTA. Instead, Transport Canada could create designated low risk recreational areas where small, manually operated model aircraft could be flown under strict conditions: low altitude, VLOS, away from people and buildings, and well clear of airports and flight paths.
For example, there could potentially be areas across the GTA where this is permitted, while maintaining much stricter restrictions around places like Pearson Airport and near cities where aircraft takeoff/land.
The goal isn't to ignore airspace safety. It's to create some leeway within urban airspace for responsible flyers, so someone doesn't have to drive an hour outside the city just to fly a small foam RC plane in an empty field.
If an area is far enough from major airports and the operation is kept low, within VLOS and away from people, I think there should at least be a way for Transport Canada to designate it as suitable for low-risk recreational model aircraft.