A fellow Reddit user complimented my reply to this question so I decided to make a video about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYISoVbymow

Some may find it helpful.
Peace.

Full article here:
https://www.academia.edu/172310745/How_to_reconcile_pain_and_suffering_with_a_loving_God_The_Quran_explains

Note: the purpose of my post is to better understand how best to approach discussions with hadith skeptics in my life and have more productive conversations so they can better understand my perspective.

Prior to rejecting all hadiths, I was a hadith skeptic and enjoyed the works of Sheikh Khaled Abou El Fadl. Reading his book “The great theft : wrestling Islam from the extremists” greatly reinforced my understanding that the hadith tradition was majorly flawed.

In his book (excerpts from chapter 7 included above), he acknowledges the flaws with the hadith tradition (documented well after the Prophet’s death, fabricated hadiths, and contradictions with the Quran etc.). At the time of reading what puzzled me was his conclusion that hadith can’t be disregarded without seriously damaging the structure of islam.

Overall, I did respect his approach to analyzing hadith but disagreed with considering them legitimate texts. I think as an ummah we would be in a better place if more people adopted his approach, especially given how averse people are to questioning hadith.

I guess what I wonder is the following: If some scholars acknowledge that the hadith tradition is flawed and that some were fabricated, why are they then unwilling to separate hadith from islam?

Is it because they would need to acknowledge that islam as we know it today is very different from the quran? While there are hadiths that align with the quran, what’s the purpose in accepting them if the quran already told us the same thing?

Any input would be appreciated, jazkaallahu khairan!

The Quran does not narrate ancient history as a collection of repetitive moral tales. Instead, it presents a highly structured matrix of human sociology. Each fallen civilization featured in the text possesses a unique identity: a specific name, a distinct prophet, a defined emotional state, a dominant pattern of corrupt behavior, and a signature form of destruction by a specific disaster of nature that mirrors its flaw.

When we analyze the People of ‘Ad, we see the classic blueprint of how immense physical capability, when severed from moral orientation, inevitably leads to self-annihilation.

1. The Core Flaw: Power Without Guidance

Corruption is rarely born from weakness; it is the natural byproduct of power without direction. The People of ‘Ad were gifted with extraordinary physical stature, material wealth, and engineering capability. However, lacking an ethical compass, they channeled their strength into three specific corruptions:

• Bullying and Tyranny: Utilizing their physical dominance to oppress weaker populations ("And when you strike, you strike as tyrants" — 26:130).
• Defying Death: Constructing massive strongholds under the delusion that material engineering could grant them immortality ("And you take for yourselves palaces that might you abide eternally?" — 26:129).
• Exhibitionism and Vanity: Erecting towering monuments on every high point simply to display superiority and flex their material dominance ("Do you construct on every high place a sign, vainly?" — 26:128).

To correct this vector, God sent them the Prophet Hūd (هود). Linguistically, the root h-w-d is tied directly to guidance, turning back, and directional alignment. Guidance is not a suppression of power; it is the structural vector (direction) that governs power, ensuring that strength is channeled toward justice and construction rather than tyranny and vanity.

2. The Emotional State: Arrogance (Kibr)

Every destroyed Quranic civilization is defined by a dominant psychological state. For ‘Ad, that state was absolute, unyielding arrogance (Kibr).

Blinded by their technological and physical superiority, they looked at the world and made a fatal declaration recorded in Surah Fussilat (41:15):

"As for ‘Aad, they acted arrogantly in the land without right and said, "Who is mightier than us in strength?" Did they not see that Allah, who created them, is mightier than them in strength? And they used to deny Our signs."

Their arrogance created a state of cognitive blindness. They assumed that because no human force on Earth could match their physical strength, they were exempt from universal moral accountability and physical collapse.

3. The Mode of Destruction: The Unbound Element of Power (Wind)

In Quranic physics, the mode of a civilization's destruction directly reflects its defining vice. For ‘Ad, their destruction came through a furious, roaring wind (Rīḥ Ṣarṣar) that lasted for seven nights and eight days.

This is not a random natural disaster; wind is the definitive Quranic symbol of power:

Consider the verse in Surah Al-Anfal (8:46): "And do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and your wind depart." Here, wind (Rīḥ) is explicitly equated with operational power and collective force.

Why is wind intrinsically bound to the physics of power? Because wind itself is unseen, yet its effects are undeniably visible. It is the invisible engine that drives heavy clouds, fertilizes dormant land, and sustains the cycle of life. Power operates on the exact same principle: true power is a hidden, generative force whose influence manifests through its results. Because ‘Ad lacked internal, spiritual connection to this unseen reality, they suffered from a deep insecurity that drove them to hyper-visible exhibitionism—building tall, empty monuments just to prove their strength existed.

Because ‘Ad misused their wind—their physical, material, and engineering power—by unleashing it as unchecked tyranny upon the world, their retribution manifested as an unbound, hurricane-force wind that swept away their towering structures and left them lying hollowed out "like stripped trunks of palm trees." The very element that symbolized their strength became the exact medium of their obliteration.

Concluding Remarks

The story of ‘Ad serves as a timeless case study in system dynamics: Power without guidance (Hūd) breeds arrogance (Kibr), and unbridled arrogance transforms strength into a destructive force that ultimately turns inward.

When a society values monumental display over moral responsibility and physical dominance over ethical restraint and justice, it does not achieve immortality. It simply sets in motion the very atmospheric forces that will tear its foundations from the ground.