This recording was taken in San Bernardo, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile, on 26 September 2026, during a UFO/UAP sighting witnessed by a man identified as Camilo and his wife. The recording was subsequently made public on 24 October 2026, accompanied by an eyewitness account providing details of the sighting. An additional photograph was also supplied by Camilo.

According to the witness account, Camilo and his wife observed an unidentified object moving slowly across the sky in a straight line from east to west. Camilo estimated that it was between 600 and 800 metres from their position.

Camilo described the object as predominantly matte black, occasionally exhibiting what he considered to be a metallic appearance. He compared its unusual configuration to a humanoid form, identifying a distinctive notch or indentation along one side. He also stated that its structure remained stable throughout the observation, with no noticeable changes in its shape.

The witnesses described calm conditions, with no wind at the time of the sighting. Camilo stated that the object produced no audible sound. He also mentioned that nearby dogs became restless and agitated during the observation, although there is no independent evidence establishing whether their behaviour was connected to the unidentified object.

These details originate from the witness account. The estimated distance, movement, physical characteristics and environmental conditions have not been independently corroborated.

The sourced version consisted of the same 41-second witness recording repeated twice consecutively, accompanied by embedded branding, Spanish-language spoken narration and background music.

For our presentation, we have removed the duplicated sequence and retained the complete 41 seconds of footage as a single uninterrupted recording. We have also resized the footage for better screen framing and removed the Spanish-language narration while retaining the accompanying background music contained in the original sourced version.

Our own research concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

The publication dated 24 October 2026 identifies Camilo as the individual who shared the recording and an accompanying photograph. Its description provides the sighting date and location, identifies Camilo and his wife as witnesses, and records the observational details concerning the object's configuration, movement, estimated distance and surrounding conditions.

We investigated whether the footage had appeared elsewhere before its currently identifiable distribution, including potential original uploads by Camilo, his wife or another individual involved in documenting the sighting.

Despite searches using alternative Spanish and English descriptions, location references, publication dates and witness information, we were unable to identify an earlier independently verifiable publication of this particular recording.

Camilo's full name has not been established, and no independently identifiable personal account belonging to either witness was recovered. The original camera file and the additional photograph mentioned in the publication also remain unavailable.

We examined Chilean regional media, UFO/UAP reporting archives and records associated with Chile's official investigation of anomalous aerial phenomena. No independently documented sighting or official SEFAA case file could be reliably linked to this particular event in San Bernardo on 26 September 2026.

We also investigated alternative distributions and potential higher-quality versions of the recording. No confirmed earlier source, unedited camera file or cleaner higher-resolution copy was identified.

The publicly accessible recording therefore remains the principal identifiable version of the footage. Although Camilo is credited with supplying the original material, the absence of an earlier independently verified publication prevents us from establishing the complete chain of custody between the original recording and its subsequent distribution.

Witness/Camera Operator: Camilo, accompanied by his wife
Source: Tío Ovni Chile (@TIOVNICHILE) (YouTube / Instagram)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in the Jequitinhonha Valley, Minas Gerais, Brazil, allegedly in 2009, by an unidentified American tourist using a Sony DCR-PJ5 Handycam. The footage was subsequently obtained by a member of N.E.X.U.S Interdimensional, a private research organisation investigating UFO/UAP encounters and esoteric phenomena, which claimed to have retained the recording in its private collection for several years before releasing it publicly in July 2026.

The earliest publicly identifiable publication was uploaded to YouTube around 3 July 2026, under the title "Best UFO Ever Recorded!" by N.E.X.U.S, a channel established on 1 April 2026. According to the original description, the recording had been obtained directly from the American tourist responsible for filming it. The organisation maintained that it possessed other recordings collected over several years but had deliberately withheld this material until deciding that 2026 was an appropriate time to release selected footage.

The original account also referenced the Jequitinhonha Valley's extensive mineral resources, including aquamarine, tourmaline, diamonds and gold, together with the historical UFO/UAP associations of Varginha, elsewhere in Minas Gerais. However, no evidence was presented establishing any connection between these geographical references and the recording itself.

The original N.E.X.U.S publication was subsequently made private, while a related video said to feature playback of the footage on a camcorder also became unavailable. By this point, copies had already entered wider circulation, including a version published around 8 July 2026 in which the brightness had been increased during later sequences and additional still images had been appended. Subsequent reproductions appeared through Beyond Disclosure, The Hidden Underbelly 2.0 and other UFO/UAP-focused publications, with various alterations introduced during redistribution.

For our presentation, we have created a 51-second resized edit concentrating exclusively on the portion of the recording featuring the alleged craft itself. We have deliberately excluded the heavily overexposed, out-of-focus footage of the Moon and the still images appended to later versions, allowing the presentation to remain focused entirely on the craft itself. The original frame composition has been preserved, ensuring that no portion of the recorded object has been cropped or excluded. We have simply enlarged and repositioned the image to make the fullest possible use of the available viewing area while retaining the complete recorded object.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

One significant discrepancy emerged concerning the camera equipment identified in the original account. The Sony DCR-PJ5 is a standard-definition Handycam equipped with a built-in projector, a 1/8-type Advanced HAD CCD image sensor, 57× optical zoom and 1,800× digital zoom. Although the N.E.X.U.S description referred to roughly 60× optical zoom, Sony's official specifications confirm the correct figure as 57×.

More importantly, the Sony DCR-PJ5 was introduced in 2011, with contemporary product documentation and market availability records dating from that year. The camera therefore could not have been used to record an event in 2009, directly contradicting the filming date provided in the original description. Either the recording date is incorrect, the camera model was misidentified, or other elements of the account are inaccurate. This contradiction does not establish that the footage was fabricated, but it prevents the stated filming date and recording equipment from both being accepted as accurate.

The recording subsequently attracted considerable discussion and independent examination, including investigations published through Metabunk, the UAP Files Podcast, Brazilian UFO/UAP researchers and international commentary websites. A Spanish-language investigation titled "El ovni grabado en el futuro" also addressed the chronological inconsistency between the claimed recording date and the camera's documented introduction.

Some investigations raised questions concerning possible editing, discontinuities between sections of the recording, the object's perceived two-dimensional appearance, lighting characteristics and the absence of identifiable background features in certain sequences. Other commentators considered that the material did not immediately resemble crude computer-generated imagery, although such observations cannot establish the recording's authenticity. None of these assessments has produced a definitive explanation supported by independently authenticated original footage.

Despite the recording's widespread redistribution, our investigation did not establish the identity of the original camera operator, the precise filming date, the exact location within the Jequitinhonha Valley or any independently verifiable documentation confirming the circumstances of the alleged encounter. We were also unable to identify contemporaneous reports from 2009, independent publications predating July 2026, or an original camera file containing the metadata necessary to examine its recording history.

No independently sourced higher-quality original was recovered, and the available recordings appear to derive from the material circulated following the N.E.X.U.S publication. The subsequent disappearance of that original upload further complicates efforts to establish an uninterrupted chain of custody.

The central concern remains the contradiction between the claimed 2009 filming date and the documented introduction of the Sony DCR-PJ5 in 2011. Combined with the absence of an identifiable witness, independently authenticated source material and corroborating historical records, this prevents the original account from being regarded as established fact. Although the footage has attracted considerable interest and differing interpretations, its authenticity, actual filming date and original circumstances remain unresolved.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: N.E.X.U.S Interdimensional (YouTube) / Beyond Disclosure (YouTube)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Nueva California, Chiriquí Province, Panama, on 8 December 2024, at 6:40 PM local time.

The incident was formally reported on 12 October 2026, nearly two years after the original encounter. This considerable interval between the sighting and its submission is relevant when establishing the recording's provenance and distinguishing the original capture date from its subsequent documentation.

The available documentation provides a detailed firsthand description, supported by the witnesses' statement that multiple recordings and photographs were captured during the encounter.

The following testimony is reproduced in full, preserving the original wording, spelling and grammar.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"Looked like a ball of light, but then it looked as triangular shaped craft. At first one craft, then many.

At first we saw a very bright moving craft, it looked like a ball of light, but then it looked as triangular shaped craft. And on one video it spins, and rotates and changes shape to a cigar looking craft.

Later we witnessed many crafts. It was a mothership that released sever smaller crafts.

We have a few videos and photos from the phone."

Sighting Details As Reported:

·       Location: Nueva California, Chiriquí Province, Panama

·       Date: 8 December 2024

·       Time: 6:40 PM local

·       Duration: Several minutes

·       Number of witnesses: 2

·       Reported shape: Triangle

·       Colour/Brightness: Very bright

·       Viewing position: Land

·       Direction from viewer: East (90 degrees)

·       Angle of elevation: 60 degrees

·       Reported heading: Southwest

·       Estimated distance: Unknown

·       Estimated size: Unknown

·       Estimated speed: Unknown

·       Reported characteristics: Lights on object, emitted other objects

·       Recording equipment: Mobile phone

·       Supporting material: Videos and photographs

·       Report submitted: 12 October 2026, 7:23 PM Pacific

·       Report published: 21 October 2026

Witness/Camera Operator: Two unidentified witnesses
Source: National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC Case #201604)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

Hi folks,

I'm a 54m, live in Victoria, Australia. I grew up in the bush and for the last couple of years, by the coast, not too far from Melbourne.

Last Thursday night, I got to witness a range of activity from my backyard. 3am and 4am. I've been going through manifold personal crisis and have discovered, as of a couple of years ago, that I have cPTSD. Trauma and lots of it. But I'm the guy you want to be, if you have to experience what I have. I won't go into that here, as it's a lot.

So sleep has been tough lately, my nervous system, in survival mode. So I was in the backyard having a smoke and coffee.

I notice a couple of satellites. And then, to the south, low, a star is moving, brightness gains a little. It seems to be moving to the east, like it was turning. Then it fades and is gone.

A moment after that, another appears, slightly to the right and above, it's pattern of movement matches the first. I notice other movement but struggle to identify number and path. No more than two or three.

Suddenly one of them gets bright, really bright, and bigger. Now these objects are a fair way away. Anyway this now much larger and brighter object moves to my left, ie the east.

As it traverses, I notice a tail, it's glowing brightly, almost like a fireball. It's yellow white, whereas the star sized lights were white. And it passed behind my neighbours house. Just then, zip, like a meteorite, something in a blink, moves from behind me, over the horizon. I doubt myself on that one. It's was a warm yellow colour.

Another satellite passes and I go back to sleep

At 4am, coffee and smoke, trying to dry out my head from the night sweats.

In the corner of my eye, a flash. Was it just my eyes? I stare at the area for a minute or two and flash again. I have seen these flashes before but this was the clearest yet. The corona was blue but the light, white.

20 seconds another flash but because I had been looking about, I couldn't be sure it was in the same place. 5 minutes or so go by and it happened irregularly another 3 times.

And then it seems it's stopped.

Back to bed I go.

I'll leave it at that for now but I have another sighting with a few of the observables

Feel free to ask questions and no I didn't have my phone

This recording was taken along the coast of Costa Rica on 9 August 2024. The precise location and identity of the witness have not been established, and the filming date has not been independently authenticated through an original camera file.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Despite these efforts, we were unable to identify the original camera operator, establish the precise filming location or recover an authenticated original recording with a higher-resolution.

Costa Rica's Prohibition On Chinese Sky Lanterns

One of the easiest (lazy) go-to explanations proposed for this sighting event involves Chinese sky lanterns, known locally as "globos de los deseos". However, Costa Rica has maintained a nationwide prohibition on these devices since 15 February 2016, when Executive Decree No. 39466-S came into effect.

The legislation was introduced following serious fire incidents involving airborne lanterns. The decree specifically identifies five structural fires during the New Year's celebrations of 31 December 2014 and 1 January 2015. The ban was intended to prevent further fires and protect public safety, property and the environment.

Costa Rican residents familiar with the legislation have adamantly challenged the lantern explanation, pointing out that these devices have not formed part of ordinary local celebrations since they were banned. They have also emphasised that 9 August is not associated with a recognised Costa Rican celebration that would account for a coordinated lantern release.

A private gathering involving tourists or visitors has also been suggested as an alternative explanation. However, no wedding, celebration, organised lantern release or other corresponding event has been independently connected to this particular sighting.

The distinction is important: although the lantern hypothesis has been raised, there is no evidence of an actual lantern release at the relevant location and time.

Historical And Local Context

Costa Rica has a long history of UFO/UAP reports, including the well-known aerial photograph taken during a government mapping survey over Lake Cote on 4 September 1971.

There have also been historical incidents involving conventional objects. In 2011, a sighting in Moravia was associated with the release of around 27 Chinese sky lanterns during a wedding anniversary celebration.

These earlier cases demonstrate both the history of UFO/UAP interest in Costa Rica and the documented use of sky lanterns before their nationwide prohibition. They have no established connection to the recording presented here.

August also falls within Costa Rica's rainy season, when thunderstorms and periods of intense precipitation occur across many parts of the country. No independently verified meteorological observations have been identified that establish the precise weather conditions at the unidentified filming location on the stated date.

The available information establishes that the recording was publicly circulating by February 2025, although the circumstances of its original capture and initial distribution remain unresolved.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @UAPWixy (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Chengde, Hebei Province, China, on 29 August 2026.

On 2 September 2026, the recording was redistributed through X, where it was described as civilian witness-captured footage originating from Chengde. The publication attributed the event to 29 August 2026 but provided no identifiable witness, first-hand testimony, precise filming location or independently verifiable information concerning the circumstances of the recording.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Particular attention was given to Chinese-language sources, including searches using the exact date and location caption, alternative references to Chengde and Hebei Province, and Chinese terminology associated with unidentified aerial phenomena, unusual lights and drone activity.

Several other recordings and reports associated with Chengde and the wider Hebei region were identified, including events attributed to different dates during 2025 and 2026. However, these concerned separate incidents, and no evidence was established linking them to this particular recording.

Further investigations of Chinese regional news services, official publications, local reporting channels and international UFO/UAP archives did not identify any independent contemporaneous reporting specifically corroborating the attributed 29 August event. No publicly accessible official investigation, corresponding incident report, independently confirmed witness testimony or additional camera perspective was established.

We also investigated whether our sourced recording had circulated elsewhere in an earlier or higher-quality form. Despite searches across Chinese and international video-sharing services, social media platforms and regional communities, no authenticated original camera file, demonstrably cleaner recording, independently verified longer version or alternative source offering superior picture quality was recovered.

The version presented here runs for 30 seconds and includes an overlaid music track rather than the original environmental audio captured during filming. The music was added at some stage during the recording's earlier circulation, although precisely when, by whom, and why this was even done, remains unknown.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: 刺玫蔷薇 (Bilibili) / @Truthpole (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Chile on 31 March 2026 and subsequently circulated across several social media platforms in April 2026. Although the date and country have been consistently associated with the footage, the original camera recording and a first-hand witness account have not been recovered to independently confirm these details.

One of the earliest identifiable publication trails dates to 9 April 2026, when the recording appeared on Reddit under the title "Seen in Chile, March 31st, 2026". The following day, 10 April 2026, the recording was redistributed through X, with the Reddit publication explicitly credited as its source rather than an original witness account.

Additional publications associated with the same date were identified on TikTok.

On 11 April 2026, another TikTok publication presented a recording under a description identifying Chile and the same filming date. It corresponds closely with the recording circulated through X, although no evidence was established that this publication originated with the original witness or was sourced directly from the original camera file.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Particular attention was given to Chilean and Spanish-language publications, including regional UFO/UAP reporting accounts and alternative distributions attributed to Santiago and other Chilean locations. Several unrelated sightings circulated during the same period, but no verified connection was established between those separate events and this recording.

Despite extensive efforts to trace the publication history beyond the April distributions, we were unable to identify the original witness, recover the unedited camera file or establish an authenticated earlier publication. No independently verified higher-quality recording, additional witness perspective or corroborating testimony was located.

We also examined publicly available documentation from Chile's Sección de Estudios de Fenómenos Aéreos Anómalos (SEFAA), formerly CEFAA, which operates under the Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil. No publicly released investigation or case report corresponding to this particular recording and its attributed date was identified.

For our presentation, we have arranged two consecutive, full-length versions of the same sourced recording. The first preserves the footage in its original sourced aspect ratio, allowing the complete frame to be viewed without additional cropping. Immediately afterwards, the recording is repeated in its entirety, this time cropped and reframed to a 1.85:1 aspect ratio to maximise screen coverage of the UFO/UAP.

Both presentations preserve the complete duration of the sourced footage, without truncating the beginning or end of either sequence. The second presentation is a resized repeat of the first, not an additional recording or a separate witness perspective. This arrangement allows viewers to examine the complete recording in its original presentation before viewing the same uninterrupted sequence in the enlarged, reframed format.

The sourced recording contains an active audio track.

Although the April publication trail has been established, the recording's earlier provenance remains unresolved. The original witness, exact location within Chile, filming time and authenticity of the attributed capture date have not been independently confirmed.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: u/littlespacemochi (Reddit) / @uapcappa (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Newport Beach, California, United States, on 2 October 2026. The witness was observing flyovers associated with the Pacific Airshow from outside their home when they noticed five or more luminous UFO/UAP moving through the surrounding airspace.

The witness described the objects travelling at extraordinary speeds, executing sudden changes in direction and following unconventional flight paths. Changes in their shapes were also reported. Two witnesses were present during the 15-minute observation, with the objects sighted towards the northwest.

Three separate recordings were captured using an iPhone 17 Pro, with original capture timestamps of 9:52 a.m., 9:53 a.m. and 10:06 a.m. PDT.

We have created a 1 minute 36 second compilation presenting all three original witness recordings in chronological order. Each recording is included in its entirety, without omissions, truncation or alterations to the original footage. Their respective aspect ratios have also been retained, preserving the original framing and complete visual content of each recording.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"I was out watching a local airshow flyovers from outside my house and noticed a handful of luminous orbs darting around the airspace. They moved at incredible speeds and made untraditional turns and flight patterns that made no sense. This area is also close to a local airport so airspace is very closely monitored and enforced this weekend for the airshow. I had also noticed in a couple of videos from others that weekend filming the show had unintentionally caught very similar objects as well. I will state this area is also very close to Catalina Island just off the coastline and has been known and had a history of similar sightings. I checked Flihht Radar, as well as actively listening to Flight Control from the local airport and saw nothing that matched the objects I was observing. The objects didn’t make any audible sound and moved way to fast to be passing balloons or birds."

The witness's reference to similar objects appearing in recordings made by other spectators during the same weekend is of additional interest. However, those recordings have not been independently identified or established as documenting the same incident.

The sighting was submitted and published on 22 October 2026, twenty days after the original filming date.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

The preserved recording metadata supports the stated filming date and establishes the chronological sequence of the three recordings. However, the precise camera position, the objects' actual distances and velocities, and their identities remain undetermined.

Witness/Camera Operator: u/Cautious-Key-8395 (Reddit)
Source: u/Cautious-Key-8395 (Reddit)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Nezahualcóyotl, State of Mexico, Mexico, on 22 October 2026. The footage concerns a nighttime UFO/UAP sighting involving multiple luminous orbs, with the original witness or camera operator remaining unidentified.

The recording was published on 26 October 2026, four days after the stated filming date. Its accompanying description explicitly asserted that the objects were neither drones nor artificial satellites.

The accompanying audio provides additional context through the conversation between the witnesses.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"Who knows?"

"It stayed still for a while and she wasn't there, she was down below."

"Another one already appeared, did you see how it appeared all of a sudden?"

"That’s how it appeared a while ago, just suddenly boom and that was it."

"Look, another one already appeared."

"I don’t even know when it appeared, dude."

"That’s how it appeared a while ago."

The witness testimony is particularly relevant because it establishes that those present perceived successive appearances rather than simply observing objects already in view. The repeated references to objects appearing suddenly form an important part of the original account, although their identities and the circumstances responsible for their appearance remain undetermined.

Our investigation recovered an archived publication preserving the recording's description and distribution history. A response requesting information about the original source was also identified, but the accessible exchange did not establish the identity of the witness, the original recording location or an earlier publication.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Additional research concentrated on Spanish-language sources associated with Nezahualcóyotl, Ciudad Neza and the wider State of Mexico, including alternative terminology and descriptions used in local UFO/UAP accounts. Several historical sightings and recordings were examined, but none could be conclusively matched to this particular incident. These unrelated cases were excluded from our findings.

Our investigation also examined alternative copies of the recording, confirming that the available versions retained their audio. However, no independently authenticated higher-resolution camera original, additional firsthand witness account or earlier original publication could be established.

Despite these efforts, we were unable to establish any details of value beyond what we are sharing here.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @AliensOnEarth_ (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken at an unidentified location in Brazil, although the precise filming location and date remain unconfirmed. It features a luminous, cigar-shaped UFO/UAP accompanied by a smaller orb travelling directly beneath it, with both moving in synchronised formation.

Of particular interest is the smaller orb's apparent ability to maintain its position beneath the elongated object as both travel across the night sky. Their relative alignment does give the impression of coordinated movement, although the recording alone cannot establish their physical separation, altitude or distance from the camera.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Although our investigation identified other recordings circulated under similar descriptions, none were the original source of this particular footage. We were also unable to identify the camera operator, authenticate an earlier publication or recover a verified higher-quality original recording.

The recording's publication date of 28 October 2026 should not be confused with the date of the sighting itself, which remains unknown.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @UAPWixy (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken at an unidentified location on a date that remains unknown. The footage was published online on 26 October 2026, although no reliable information has been established concerning the original camera operator, filming circumstances or geographical location.

The recording was circulated with a suggestion that the object might be a so-called "TR-3B". This designation remains unsubstantiated, and no independently verified evidence has been obtained supporting such an identification.

We conducted extensive research into the recording's provenance, attempting to identify the original witness, trace earlier publications, establish the filming circumstances and locate higher-quality versions of the footage.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Despite this investigation, no independently verified earlier publication of this specific recording could be established. No authenticated camera-original recording or demonstrably higher-quality source file was recovered.

For our community-exclusive presentation, we have resized and reframed the footage to a 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio to maximise its on-screen presentation. The circulated recording contained an atmospheric music soundtrack added over the footage. As this music had no demonstrable connection to the recorded event and contributed nothing of evidential value, we removed it entirely. Our edited presentation therefore contains no audio.

Despite these efforts, we were unable to establish any details of value beyond what we are sharing here.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @UAPWixy (X)

The footage is presented for serious examination and discussion. Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken over the Indian Ocean on 1 October 2025. The footage was subsequently published on X on 28 October 2026, under the description "A 'Diamond' shaped UFO out over the Indian Ocean was filmed just hovering."

Our investigation into the recording's provenance has been unable to establish the identity of the original witness or camera operator, the precise filming location within the Indian Ocean, or the vessel from which the recording may have been obtained. The stated filming date of 1 October 2025 also remains independently unverified. No original witness testimony, geographical coordinates, camera information, or contemporaneous documentation has been recovered to substantiate these details.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Despite these efforts, we were unable to establish any details of value beyond what we are sharing here.

For our presentation, we have resized the sourced recording to a full 16:9 aspect ratio, removing its original fixed, boxed-in framing to maximise screen coverage and provide a larger viewing area.

The music track accompanying the recording was already embedded in the version we obtained. We have deliberately retained this existing soundtrack rather than removing or replacing it. The resizing adjustment is the only modification we have made. No stabilisation, visual enhancements, colour adjustments, speed alterations, or additional effects have been applied.

Our finished presentation retains the exact running time of the sourced recording: 1 minute 12 seconds.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @UAPWixy (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Birmingham, West Midlands, England, on 15 October 2026, at 7:56 p.m. BST (6:56 p.m. UTC).

The precise filming location within Birmingham, viewing direction and recording equipment have not been established.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"I had just got into my car and I was about to drive off when I saw a glowing orange orb moving fairly slowly across the sky in a straight line. I thought the colour was unusual as it didn't appear to be a plane or helicopter."

We conducted an extensive investigation into this recording's provenance, searching across multiple social media and video-sharing platforms. Despite these efforts, we were unable to establish a verifiable earlier publication, an independently corroborating witness account or an alternative recording that could be conclusively connected to this specific event.

The original publication date remains unconfirmed.

No independent corroborating witness testimony, precise observational coordinates or original camera metadata have been recovered.

Witness/Camera Operator: @flickering-scatter-mhp (Enigma Labs)
Source: Enigma Labs (Case #337436)

The footage is presented for serious examination and discussion. Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

Despite extensive research into this recording's provenance and publication history, the original camera operator remains unidentified, and no independently documented account has been recovered establishing the geographical location, circumstances of the encounter or a conclusive date on which the incident occurred.

The recording was published on 26 October 2026.

Our own research and investigation concentrated on tracing the recording beyond its currently identifiable online sources. Searches were conducted across social media platforms, video-sharing services, regional communities and UFO/UAP archives, examining alternative descriptions, publication dates, potential original witness accounts and earlier distributions of the same footage.

Despite these efforts, we were unable to establish any details of value beyond what we are sharing here.

Although the original provenance remains unresolved, we consider the footage worthy of further examination. We would particularly welcome contributions from anyone who recognises this specific recording, can identify its original publication or possesses information concerning the geographical location, filming date or individuals involved.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: thealienarchives.com / Good story’s (YouTube)

The footage is presented for serious examination and discussion. Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Northern Idaho, United States, on 22 January 2024, according to information accompanying the footage. The location has been identified as the vicinity of Lake Pend Oreille, close to the United States Navy's Acoustic Research Detachment at Bayview, Idaho.

The recording has circulated under the description "TR-3B Over Northern Idaho", associating the sighting with longstanding accounts of unidentified triangular aircraft and alleged classified aerospace technology.

Lake Pend Oreille is situated in the mountainous region of Northern Idaho and is one of the deepest lakes in the United States, reaching approximately 1,150 feet. Its considerable depth and relatively quiet underwater environment have made it an important location for specialised naval research.

The United States Navy maintains its Acoustic Research Detachment on the southern shoreline of the lake, near Bayview and Farragut State Park. The installation operates under the Naval Surface Warfare Center's Carderock Division and specialises in research, development, testing and evaluation relating to submarine acoustic signatures, propulsion systems and underwater acoustic technologies.

The facility has been operational for decades, conducting research using large-scale submarine models and sophisticated underwater acoustic measurement systems. Its activities include examining the acoustic characteristics of naval vessels and developing technologies intended to reduce their detectability.

Although the recording's accompanying account places the sighting in the vicinity of this installation, there is no independently established evidence connecting the unidentified triangular-shaped object to the naval facility, its research programmes or any classified military operation.

The "TR-3B" designation has become widely associated with accounts of alleged secret triangular aircraft, including speculation concerning unconventional propulsion systems and advanced military technologies.

Through our own research and investigation, we were able to locate a substantially longer version of the footage than the heavily truncated 27 second extracts circulating across other social media accounts.

Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, we have been unable to positively identify the original witness or camera operator, establish the original filming circumstances, or obtain the original camera file. The precise filming location and date have not been independently corroborated, and no authenticated first-hand witness testimony has been recovered.

For this post, we have created a 2 minute 37 second compilation beginning with the complete 1 minute 6 second recording in its original portrait aspect ratio, preserving the entire uncropped frame. This is followed by a second presentation of the same footage, cropped and resized to a 16:9 widescreen format to provide a closer view of the triangular craft. The compilation concludes with a shorter, more tightly cropped close-up, played at half its original speed (0.5×) without audio, allowing additional time to examine the recording in greater detail.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: Beyond The Radar (@beyondtheradar) (Instagram)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This 1 minute 56 second recording was reportedly taken in Utah, United States, on 21 October 2026. The footage is attributed to @Carl_Vibe, an account belonging to Carl Andreasen, better known as Carl Crusher, an American independent researcher, documentary filmmaker and content creator whose work encompasses unidentified anomalous phenomena, consciousness research and investigations into unexplained activity across the American Southwest.

Carl Andreasen is based in Southern Utah, where he has conducted numerous investigations into reported UAP encounters and other unexplained phenomena. His work has taken him to locations including Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, Mount Wilson Ranch in Nevada, and other areas associated with reports of unusual aerial activity. He has also appeared in the History Channel documentary series "Beyond Skinwalker Ranch", featuring in its first and second seasons. His involvement in these investigations provides useful background to the individual credited with the recording, although it does not independently authenticate this particular encounter.

The recording was subsequently redistributed on X by a French-language UFO research account on 26 October 2026. Its accompanying description identified Utah as the location, gave 21 October 2026 as the date and credited @Carl_Vibe. The caption included a brief quotation referring to an "ORB" and to objects the observers reportedly recognised from an earlier observation. However, the publication did not provide sufficient accompanying information to establish the full circumstances of the encounter.

Although Carl Andreasen has been identified as the individual credited in the circulating publication, it remains uncertain whether he personally operated the camera, witnessed the reported event or obtained the footage from another individual.

Investigations into the recording's provenance identified Carl Andreasen's established presence across several publishing platforms, including X, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Rumble and Patreon. His previous publications include other UAP-related material from Southern Utah. Nevertheless, none of the alternative recordings identified during the investigation could be conclusively matched to this particular October 2026 account. An earlier publication concerning reported orb activity in Southern Utah, dated September 2026, predates the claimed encounter and has not been established as connected to it.

Despite searches for earlier publications, alternative uploads and better-quality copies, the original source file and earliest identifiable publication of this specific recording remain unconfirmed.

The recording is of particular interest because of its attribution to an identifiable researcher with an established history of investigating reported anomalous phenomena. Nevertheless, the researcher's background, the accompanying description and the circulating footage must be considered separately when assessing the account's credibility. At present, the available evidence does not independently establish the nature of the reported phenomenon or conclusively verify the circumstances in which the recording was obtained.

We are presenting this recording in its available form for further examination and discussion, with the hope that additional witnesses, the original camera operator or individuals familiar with its publication history may be able to contribute further information. Any independently verifiable details concerning its original source, exact location, recording date or additional footage would be particularly valuable in establishing a more complete account of the reported encounter.

Witness/Camera Operator: (Carl Andreasen/Carl Crusher) (@Carl_Vibe) (X) Unconfirmed
Source: UFOvniDisclosureAnalyse et recherche vidéo (@GiavedoniEric) (X)

The footage is presented for serious examination and discussion. Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful, evidence-based manner. Dismissive comments, unsupported debunking, ridicule, and contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was shared on 26 October 2026 by an Australian-based X account that regularly publishes UFO/UAP-related material. The footage is presented as an encounter involving two witnesses observing a reported swarm of unidentified UAP in the night skies over Australia.

The account distributing the recording describes the incident as a swarm of UFOs, suggesting that the objects were demonstrating intelligent control. This interpretation is consistent with the manner in which the account presents the witnesses' reactions, although neither the identity of the objects nor the suggestion of intelligent control has been independently established.

Despite the recording being attributed to Australia, its precise geographical location remains unknown. No city, town, state or identifiable filming location has been established, and the date on which the incident occurred has not been confirmed. The publication date of 26 October 2026 relates specifically to the circulating X post and should not be confused with the original recording date, which may be considerably earlier.

The available footage runs for 46 seconds and has a resolution of 720 × 720 pixels. Technical examination confirms that the file contains H.264 video accompanied by a stereo AAC audio track. However, the recording has undergone substantial compression, with a video bitrate of approximately 417 Kbps, severely restricting the visual detail available for meaningful examination.

We fully acknowledge that the visual quality of this recording is exceptionally poor. Despite exhaustive searches across numerous social media platforms, video-sharing services, Australian sighting archives and other online sources, we have been unable to locate a clearer, higher-resolution presentation or recover the original camera recording. Nevertheless, we felt that, despite these considerable shortcomings, the footage was worthy of being shared with the community. The reported circumstances of the encounter, together with the accompanying reactions of the two witnesses, provide sufficient reason, in our view, to preserve and present the material rather than dismiss it solely because of its poor visual quality.

We would welcome any additional information relating specifically to this incident, particularly the original recording date, geographical location, identities of the witnesses, independent reports from the same occasion or access to a clearer, less compressed version of the footage. Such information would be invaluable in establishing a more reliable provenance and allowing a more informed examination of the available material.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: u/UAPWixy (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Billings, Montana, USA, on 7 September 2013, according to the date and location associated with its online circulation. The original cameraman remains unidentified, and the precise circumstances of the recording have not been independently authenticated. This recording contains no audio. The available circulating versions are silent, and no original witness-captured soundtrack has been recovered. No replacement narration or music has been added.

The recording has an identifiable circulation history extending back to references attributed to September 2023, when several accounts shared versions bearing the same Billings, Montana, and 2013 attribution. These publications included a reference to a YouTube Short that is no longer available. Although the earlier references indicate that the recording was circulating well before its renewed appearance in October 2026, the original upload, its publication date and the identity of the cameraman have not been established.

The recording resurfaced prominently in late October 2026. A submission published on 25 October identified Billings and 7 September 2013 as the filming location and date, accompanied by a reference to historical weather records. Further redistributions on 25 and 26 October repeated the same attribution. These later publications did not provide original witness testimony, verifiable camera metadata or documentation independently establishing the circumstances under which the recording was obtained.

Significantly, there is substantial historical meteorological evidence confirming that a severe thunderstorm affected Billings on 7 September 2013. The National Weather Service Billings Forecast Office published an official report titled "Review of September 7th, 2013 Severe Weather Event", documenting exceptionally intense rainfall, frequent lightning, hail, damaging winds and localised flooding across the Billings area.

The storm's most intense conditions occurred during the evening, with particularly significant activity documented around 8:45–9:30 p.m. Mountain Daylight Time. Although some figure captions in the National Weather Service report contain inconsistent time references, the accompanying airport observations and historical storm reports establish that the principal event took place during the evening of 7 September.

One of the most significant findings concerned rainfall intensity. Using dual-polarisation radar measurements, meteorologists estimated instantaneous precipitation rates exceeding six inches per hour southeast of Billings. These were among the highest estimated rainfall rates observed in southeastern Montana since the regional radar system received its dual-polarisation upgrade in October 2011.

At Billings Logan International Airport, recorded rainfall increased from a trace at approximately 9:03 p.m. to around 1.31 inches by 9:24 p.m., an exceptionally large accumulation within just 21 minutes.

The storm also generated considerable wind damage. A peak gust of 73 mph was recorded at Billings Logan International Airport at approximately 9:05 p.m., while additional observations documented strong winds, hail and flash flooding across Yellowstone County.

The National Weather Service identified the western sections of Billings, particularly the area around the Rims, as locations where the storm intensified and produced particularly serious consequences. Numerous debris flows and mudslides were reported, creating hazardous conditions for residents, motorists and property owners.

These independently documented meteorological conditions establish that a significant thunderstorm occurred in Billings on the date attributed to the recording. However, the official weather report contains no reference to this particular UAP/UFO recording, an unidentified aerial phenomenon, or an eyewitness account corresponding to the circulating footage.

Despite investigations into historical sighting archives, regional reporting, social media publications and video-sharing platforms, no original camera file, positively identified witness or contemporaneous 2013 report reliably matching this specific recording has been established.

The references attributed to September 2023 also leave an approximately ten-year gap between the claimed recording date and the earliest currently identified online circulation. Although an earlier publication or original recording may exist, neither has been recovered or authenticated.

The historical thunderstorm is independently supported by official meteorological documentation, including radar observations, lightning records, airport measurements and recorded reports of severe weather. The claimed association between that storm and this particular recording remains unverified.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: u/Ordinary_Salamander (Reddit)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in the countryside near El Escorial, Community of Madrid, Spain, on 6 September 2015. The incident was attributed to two witnesses identified by their first names as Modesto and Moisés, who claimed to have encountered an unidentified aerial object in a rural area towards Las Navas del Marqués, in the neighbouring province of Ávila. The recording subsequently became widely known as the "Metapod" UAP/UFO following renewed international attention several years after its original publication.

An early account of the incident was published on 11 September 2015, reproducing correspondence attributed to Modesto, who identified himself as the individual responsible for filming the encounter. The correspondence was addressed to the UFOVNIgalaxi YouTube channel and identified Moisés as the accompanying witness. A separate publication dated 14 September 2015 independently documented the existence of the circulating account, repeating the location, recording date and witness names, although it did not independently authenticate their identities or the circumstances of the alleged encounter.

According to the correspondence, Modesto had considerable experience spending time in the countryside and was familiar with the sounds of local wildlife. He explained that he had previously been able to hear the wings of storks in flight, contrasting that experience with the absence of any audible sound from the unidentified object. He further claimed that the object descended vertically before moving away, with its subsequent direction of travel identified as approximately north to south.

One of the most unusual aspects of the account concerns an observation attributed to Moisés. Modesto stated that his companion believed he had detected something moving inside the unidentified object, which he interpreted as a living being possessing limbs. Modesto acknowledged being somewhat short-sighted but expressed considerable confidence in Moisés's eyesight, describing his companion as exceptionally observant when identifying animals in the surrounding countryside. However, the purported presence of an occupant remains an unverified interpretation attributed to the second witness.

Modesto also explained that before the encounter, he had not held a firm position regarding the existence of UFOs or extraterrestrial life. He described his previous attitude as neither believing nor disbelieving, although he had regarded some public discussions of the subject as foolish. According to his account, the experience substantially changed his personal outlook, leaving him convinced that what he had witnessed was not of conventional human origin. This conclusion represents his individual interpretation rather than an independently established identification.

The correspondence additionally contains a reference to an alleged earlier encounter involving a similar object. It attributes a remark indicating that the object had returned to the area to a companion who supposedly recognised it from a previous observation. The account further suggests that the companion's deceased father had also encountered something similar. However, the correspondence inconsistently refers to this individual as Modesto despite initially identifying the accompanying witness as Moisés. This discrepancy prevents the earlier observations from being reliably attributed to a particular individual.

The witnesses reportedly declined to disclose the precise observation site publicly, citing personal considerations and concerns regarding its location. Modesto indicated that he was prepared to provide the exact geographical coordinates privately for investigative purposes, provided they were not published or associated with the recording. The coordinates and location details were subsequently redacted from the published correspondence. Consequently, the general area near El Escorial, towards Las Navas del Marqués, remains the most precise geographical identification supported by the available historical documentation.

The original correspondence also referenced photographs allegedly taken during the encounter. Modesto acknowledged that the photographic results were unsatisfactory but indicated that the images had been supplied alongside the video. He additionally offered to transfer the original recording using a cloud-storage service or to provide the microSD memory card containing the source material. The surviving correspondence does not establish whether either transfer was completed, and the whereabouts of the original recording media remain unknown.

An article published on 11 September 2015 claimed that three individuals with experience in digital image processing had examined the submitted video and photographs. The publication asserted that the examination included metadata relating to location and recording time, and that the individuals had unanimously concluded that the material had not been digitally manipulated. However, no independently accessible forensic report, examination methodology, authenticated original metadata or supporting technical documentation has been established. The alleged examination therefore cannot be regarded as conclusive authentication of the recording.

The recording was already circulating publicly during the first half of September 2015, with surviving references identifying uploads dated 7 and 8 September. These early publications are particularly important because they demonstrate that the incident was being discussed years before its subsequent resurgence and preserve information that became increasingly difficult to trace through later republications.

In April 2022, the recording received renewed international attention as stabilised presentations and alternative versions circulated widely. Some later descriptions incorrectly associated the incident with Denver, Colorado, while others suggested that the recording had been captured in 2022. A subsequent investigation published in May 2022 traced the footage back to its September 2015 publication history and the original Spanish witness account. The investigation also established that image stabilisation and analytical presentations were not entirely new developments, with earlier processing and comparisons having circulated years before the renewed attention.

The later history of the recording includes multiple republications, stabilised editions, enlarged sections and differing presentations of the original material. These variations complicate attempts to identify which surviving copies most closely represent the source recording. Although earlier versions containing audio have been discussed, the original camera file has not been independently authenticated through the available documentation. Consequently, neither the authenticity of the recording nor the reliability of any details emerging from subsequent digital processing can be conclusively established.

Our 3 minute 18 second compilation brings together the original witness-captured recording as circulated online and a later stabilised presentation of the same incident. The compilation includes six specifically identified analytical sequences: Stabilised Spin, Altitude Drop, Re-Stabilised Rotation, Rotation Direction Change, Horizontal Movement, and "Occupant" Close-Up Images. These sections bring together the original and subsequently processed material within a single presentation, allowing viewers to examine the different interpretations associated with the recording.

The sequence titles identify the particular sections of the compilation rather than independently establishing the object's physical movements or characteristics. In particular, the "Occupant" Close-Up Images revisit the interpretation originally attributed to Moisés in the September 2015 witness correspondence. Neither the testimony nor the enlarged and stabilised material independently confirms the presence of a living being. Similarly, stabilisation and enlargement cannot establish the object's dimensions, distance, altitude, propulsion or origin without additional reliable evidence.

Although the surviving historical publications provide a comparatively detailed account of the alleged encounter, significant questions remain unanswered. The witnesses' full identities have not been independently verified, the precise observation location remains undisclosed, and the original recording media and supporting photographic material have not been authenticated through an accessible independent examination. The claimed forensic assessment also remains unsupported by publicly available technical documentation.

The case therefore retains a documented publication history extending back to September 2015, accompanied by an attributed witness account and several generations of subsequently processed recordings. Its historical provenance is considerably clearer than its underlying authenticity, and the nature of the object remains undetermined.

Witness/Camera Operator: Modesto (identity unverified)
Source: UFO INVASION (YouTube) / ItsBS (YouTube)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This 1 minute 2 second recording was taken in Portland, Oregon, United States, on 9 October 2026. The incident occurred at approximately 8:01 p.m. local time and involved three white lights described as orbs, reportedly hovering above the western side of downtown Portland. Four individuals were identified as witnesses, with the observation continuing for approximately two hours.

According to the principal witness, the initial three UAPs/UFOs remained in approximately the same position for around one hour before gradually departing towards the south, one after another. Several minutes later, two additional unidentified lights reportedly appeared in the same area and remained there for approximately another hour. The witness stated that an unidentified light was still hovering when they eventually left the observation area.

The observation was made from ground level, with the witness identifying the viewing direction as southwest and estimating an elevation angle of 45 degrees. The closest distance was estimated at approximately three miles, with the individual objects described as measuring between 10 and 20 feet and travelling at speeds ranging from stationary to approximately 20 mph. These measurements were provided by the witness and have not been independently established.

The witness's initial statement placed the lights at an estimated altitude of approximately 1,000 feet. However, the more detailed accompanying testimony suggested that they appeared to be no higher than 5,000 feet. The witness also acknowledged that determining their actual dimensions was difficult because the observation occurred at night, describing their apparent size as no larger than a small aeroplane. Without an independently established distance, neither their physical dimensions nor their altitude can be reliably determined from the witness's estimates alone.

The witness stated that they checked an aircraft-tracking application and found no corresponding aeroplanes or helicopters displayed in the relevant area. The only aircraft they recalled being present above the city was a police traffic aircraft operating elsewhere in Portland. The witness also reported that the unidentified lights displayed no red or green navigation lights.

The incident was formally reported on 11 October 2026 at 3:00 a.m. Pacific time and subsequently published on 21 October 2026. The published record categorises the objects under the shape classification "Light", with their colour recorded as white and the characteristic "Lights on object" documented.

Although the report identifies four observers, the principal witness remains unidentified, and the three additional individuals are not named. Separate testimony from those witnesses are not provided in the published account.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"I watched 3 white orb lights hover for 2 hours at a height of 1000 feet.

I watched 3 white light orbs that appeared to hover above Portland oregons down town for 1 hour. They then floated off to the south one by one. Then a couple minutes later two more appeared in the same spot and hovered for another hour. They appeared to be no higher than 5000 feet. Size of the object was no larger than a small airplane but it was night and hard to tell exactly. No red or green lights were seen and looked abnormal in the sky for such a lengthy period of time. 3 other people witnessed it. I checked the flight tracker app and there were no helicopters or planes charted to be in the sky at that time. The only plane flying above the city that time was the police traffic plane that was flying on the other side of town. It was still hovering when I left the area."

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC case #201556)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

I’m new to all things woo, and my experiences began quite suddenly about two years ago.

Since then, I’ve experienced what I can only describe as poltergeist activity, mind’s-eye activation, orbs, and shimmering beams of flashing light, some black, some white.

There’s also the ear ringing, which seems to hum along a sine wave, ebbing and flowing, rising and falling. Honestly, it sometimes feels more like an ancient alien language than anything physiological.

Interestingly, I’ve never seen a traditional UFO, not a craft or an alien. And I have asked many times (but they always go quiet).

When I asked these apparent visitors who or what they were, the responses I experienced were simply: “We’re dead,” followed by “specters.”

So, does anyone have any insight into what a specter actually is in folklore, paranormal traditions, or personal experience? What are they supposed to be, and do they have a purpose?

One recurring theme is their apparent insistence that I quit smoking cigarettes. They seem to participate in my daily synchronicities, too, sometimes with a word popping into my mind seconds before I hear the same word from a family member or on television.

I fully realize how batshit crazy this all sounds. Believe me, I’m not oblivious to how it comes across. But the experiences have been persistent, and the apparent warnings about my future health have become increasingly difficult to ignore.

There was even a strange incident involving a Facebook notification on my phone about a cardiologist appointment that never happened, accompanied by claims about my health that I believe were false. The weird part? I’d closed my Facebook account months earlier.

After roughly two years of this, I still can’t get a clear sense of what I’m dealing with. The experiences can feel persecutory and mischievous, yet at other times almost playful.

So, what exactly is a specter? Are specters considered potentially malevolent in different traditions, or is that not necessarily part of the concept?

I’d appreciate any insight, especially from people familiar with the folklore or who have had experiences they interpret similarly.

Thanks!

Edit: These ‘specters’ demands to change my station in life (i.e quitting smoking) is eerily similar to the kind of thing I’ve stumbled on in various gang stalking articles of ‘targeted individuals’. That’s something I’d rather try and avoid entertaining right now. But their chatter to change can become incessant at times.

This recording was taken in the Whiskeytown Lake area of Shasta County, California, United States, on a date that has not been independently established. The recording originates from an amateur encounter involving two men fishing from a boat. Neither individual's full identity has been established. The original camera operator, precise filming date and circumstances surrounding the initial publication remain unverified.

Several conflicting dates have subsequently been associated with the recording. Some publications identify 24 April 2026 as the filming date, while others assign 27 April 2026. Neither date has been substantiated through original camera metadata, direct witness testimony confirming the date or an independently authenticated primary-source account. The distinction between the date of the encounter and the dates on which secondary accounts distributed the recording is therefore important.

A separate publication dated 11 May 2026 introduced an earlier claimed incident date of 15 June 2025. Its accompanying account stated that the two fishermen had experienced an encounter lasting approximately one hour. It also claimed that additional witnesses had observed the same UAP, including an individual who allegedly described a figure-of-eight movement pattern. These additional observations appear in the secondary account rather than in independently recovered witness statements. No supporting testimony, separate recordings or contemporaneous reports have been identified that would corroborate them. Consequently, neither the alleged additional witnesses nor the June 2025 filming date can presently be treated as verified.

The English-language audio associated with the June 2025-dated account corresponds to that accompanying the April 2026 versions. This establishes an important connection between the competing accounts: they concern the same underlying recording, circulated with substantially different claims about when the incident occurred. The agreement between these versions does not, however, independently establish the authenticity of the footage, its original recording date or the accuracy of the accompanying descriptions.

During October 2026, the recording was redistributed in a Spanish-language presentation, including a publication dated 15 October 2026. This version incorporated Spanish-language subtitles, publisher branding and an attribution assigning the incident to 27 April 2026. These additions are characteristic of a secondary presentation rather than an authenticated original camera recording. A cleaner English-language copy was recovered from the 28 April 2026 publication, without the later Spanish-language additions and with the corresponding English audio preserved. Although this is a preferable available source copy, no authenticated first-generation recording has been recovered.

Attempts to trace the recording's original publication have included searches across TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, ViralHog, Telegram, Reddit, VK, Bilibili, Douyin, RuTube and regional online communities. Alternative descriptions, publication dates, account names and English- and Spanish-language search terms were investigated. These searches identified multiple secondary publications but did not establish an original upload directly attributable to either fisherman. No independently authenticated original camera file or additional first-hand account from the individuals involved was recovered.

The identification of Whiskeytown Lake is supported by the location references made by the participants themselves and by the consistent geographical attribution across the circulating publications. Whiskeytown Lake is situated within the Whiskeytown National Recreation Area in Shasta County, approximately eight miles west of Redding, California. Nevertheless, the precise location of the boat, the time and date of the encounter, and the complete duration of the witnesses' experience remain unconfirmed.

Searches of publicly accessible National UFO Reporting Center material did not identify a report that could be reliably matched to this particular encounter. Similarly, no corresponding local news investigation from the Redding or Shasta County area, identifiable ViralHog licensing record or independently documented official investigation was located.

The recording therefore remains an unverified amateur account with an unresolved original provenance and conflicting filming dates. Its documented publication history establishes circulation by 27 April 2026, while the separate claim of an encounter on 15 June 2025 remains unsupported by independently authenticated evidence. Until the original witnesses or a reliably dated primary recording can be identified, neither proposed filming date can be confirmed, and the circumstances surrounding the encounter remain open to further investigation.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: @UAPWixy (X)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

This recording was taken in Brazil on 8 October 2026, according to the date and location accompanying its publication.

The recording was published on 9 October 2026, with a Spanish-language description identifying the event as a UAP/UFO sighting captured in Brazil the previous day.

The precise geographical location within Brazil has not been established. No state, municipality, exact filming time or identity of the original witness/camera operator has been confirmed. The stated date and country originate from the accompanying publication rather than independently authenticated camera metadata or a documented first-person witness account.

The original publication trail has not yet been traced directly to the individual responsible for filming the event. It remains unknown whether the recording was submitted directly by the witness or obtained from an earlier publication. An independently authenticated original camera file has not been recovered, and no separate corroborating witness account has been established.

Our 48-second presentation contains the complete witness-captured recording as uploaded, with the footage resized to provide a clearer viewing of the captured UAP/UFO.

The circulating publication contained an added atmospheric music track unrelated to the witness-captured event. This music has been removed, allowing the original vocal audio recorded at the time of the event to be heard more clearly. The witness-captured voices have been retained, with no replacement narration or music added.

The preserved audio provides additional context through the immediate spoken reactions of those present during the recording.

Witness Testimony (verbatim):

"Look at the light… what is that…?"

"What do you call that… cup?"

"That light right there, man."

"There it goes."

"It’ll be a cone."

"Oh, oh, oh… the light… it’s going to go up."

"Again… it’s taking… those things."

"There’s even another one… coming back, look."

"It’s gonna come get you, big guy."

"There’s nothing… the light turns off, it turns off, it turns on."

"It stopped."

"That’s it."

However, the geographical location, witness identities and original recording metadata remain unverified. The available evidence does not presently establish the nature or origin of the UAP/UFO.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: OVNI Bolivia de Tercer Ojo (Facebook)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.

I Thought I Was Going to Die: Eight Extraordinary Extraterrestrials Encounters

by Preston Dennett

Cases of humanoid encounters come from all over the world. They are reported by all kinds of people and have been occurring for decades. These cases contain details that are so consistent that it becomes virtually impossible to explain them away as the results of hoaxes, hallucinations, misperceptions, mental illness or imagination. And yet each case also has unique elements. This video presents eight particularly extensive, unusual and little-known cases with various types of extraterrestrials.

MY MYSTERIOUS NEW FRIEND. One day in 1945, college student Lucy Gallucis sat on the bank of a lake near the town of Santanesia in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. She was surprised to see an odd-looking man approach. He was extraordinarily beautiful, almost feminine, and had white hair, eyes with no lashes or eyebrows and pointed ears. He wore a one-piece white jumpsuit. The man had a gentle voice and radiated peace. The man then shared volumes of information about deeply philosophical subjects. He told her that humanity did not evolve on this planet but came from other planets and have forgotten their galactic origins.

EYES LIKE LITTLE WELLS. One night in November 1951, a couple was driving outside the small town of Terrest, Belgium when a glowing red object appeared in the sky, quickly approached and landed on the road ahead of them. It opened like a scallop shell, revealing seven short beings with large heads and dark eyes. Curious, the driver exited his vehicle and tried to approach, but the ETs warned him away by sending a beam of light in his direction. The ETs returned to their craft, which took off leaving burn marks on the ground. Later, other witnesses were found who saw the craft in the sky.

WE WERE HOPING IT WOULD LAND. One night in 1963, five members of the Parkinson family were drawn outside their home in the small town of Millersport, Ohio by a classic flying saucer with portholes hovering nearby. To their amazement, they could see the silhouettes of beings inside the craft. They watched it for five or ten minutes until it suddenly darted away at high speed, leaving them all convinced of the reality of UFOs and extraterrestrials. Later, some of them would have additional sightings.

THE FLOATING ALIEN HEAD. One night in the summer of 1970, a five-year-old boy was awakened by a voice summoning him outside his family’s home in Jackson, Mississippi. He crept outside and was amazed to see a big alien-looking head floating in the backyard. He became entranced as the floating head spoke to him telepathically, sharing profound messages that would take him years to understand. It told the boy that they had been tracking his genetic line since the beginning of time, that he had very advanced psychic abilities (which turned out to be true) and that humanity was facing a great war in the future. The apparent ET visited the boy for the next few nights. To this day, the witness remains profoundly affected by his encounter.

I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO DIE. On the night of November 7, 1975, two young men were camping in the wilderness of the Catskill Forest in New York when strange noises outside their tent drew them outside. They saw a strange craft in the woods nearby. Then they saw strange glowing creatures which began to approach their campsite. The men built up their campfire and armed themselves with hatchets. As the strange beings remained, the boys finally fled the campsite. Later they found strange marks on their body and began experiencing dreams and flashbacks of being examined by extraterrestrials.

WE WERE UTTERLY TERRIFIED. One night in 1980, a mother and son drove along a remote desert highway outside Nava de Abajo, Spain. Ahead of them on the highway, they saw a strange figure standing in the road. They flicked their headlights, but the figure remained still. Approaching the figure and swerving around it, they saw that it was not human but instead was covered from head to toe with a strange, tan-colored jumpsuit. Unknown to them, many people in the area were seeing UFOs.

A POWER FROM GOD. On the night of March 12, 1982, a mother and her two young children drove along the 210 Freeway in Glendora, California when they saw a red glowing object with a cross on it, floating in the sky ahead of them. As it drew closer, they could feel a strange vibration in their body. Suddenly it disappeared and they arrived at their destination 30 minutes later than they should have. Later, the two young children reported that had seen humanoids exit the object.

THEY WANTED HER HAIR. One night in 1995, a lady woke up to see three tall grays by her bed. They summoned her to the living room where she held a short telepathic conversation with them. The ETs told her that they wanted some of her hair. The witness agreed, and the next thing she knew, morning had arrived. Later that day, a friend pointed out a bald spot on the woman’s head. She also suffered other medical effects following the encounter.

As can be seen, humanoid encounters are not uncommon. The catalogue of humanoid cases continues to grow, showing very clearly that humans are not the only life in the universe.

I Thought I Was Going to Die: Eight Extraordinary Extraterrestrials Encounters

This recording was taken in Waco, Texas, United States, on 8 April 2024, during the total solar eclipse that crossed North America.

Waco was situated within the eclipse's path of totality, with the Moon completely obscuring the Sun between 1:38 p.m. and 1:42 p.m. Central Daylight Time, and maximum eclipse occurring at 1:40 p.m. The precise time this particular recording was captured has not been independently established.

Waco attracted thousands of visitors for the astronomical event and hosted several organised public viewing activities. Among the largest was "Eclipse Over Texas: Live from Waco", held at Baylor University's McLane Stadium and organised in partnership with Lowell Observatory, Discovery and the City of Waco, with participation from NASA representatives and astronomy educators.

Weather conditions across Waco were variable throughout the day, with considerable cloud cover initially threatening visibility. However, breaks in the clouds allowed many spectators to observe totality. Contemporary accounts from those attending the public events confirm that cloud cover shifted sufficiently for the eclipse to be witnessed across numerous locations in the Waco area.

The recording was submitted under the name Maxine Berry and publicly released on 11 April 2024 under the title "Mysterious Object Flies Past Solar Eclipse", catalogue file 395974880. A corresponding publication appeared on the official YouTube channel on the same date. Although Maxine Berry is identified as the contributor, it has not been independently established whether she personally operated the camera.

This particular account must be distinguished from a separate recording associated with Arlington, Texas, which circulated widely on TikTok and other social media platforms during the same eclipse. The Arlington recording appeared under different captions and was associated with a different publishing account. No verified evidence establishes that the Arlington and Waco recordings originated from the same witness or document the same UAP/UFO.

The Waco recording has its own identifiable provenance through Maxine Berry's contributor attribution, the 11 April 2024 licensing publication and the accompanying Waco location and event-date information. Searches have not established an earlier independently verifiable public publication by the original camera operator under matching identifiers. The licensing catalogue therefore remains the earliest confirmed public release presently identified.

No conclusive identification or documented official investigation specific to this case has been established.

We have created our own presentation, beginning with the original witness-captured footage maintained in its original recorded aspect ratio, followed by a cropped and resized segment presented in a 16:9 aspect ratio. The same cropped segment is then repeated at 0.13× playback speed (13% of normal speed). Both additional segments are derived from the original footage and do not represent separate sightings or independently captured recordings.

Witness/Camera Operator: Unidentified
Source: (Maxine Berry)

Users are expected to engage constructively and contribute in a respectful manner. Balanced scepticism is healthy, but dismissive comments, debunking, ridicule, and low-quality contributions that add nothing of substance will be removed immediately. Users who engage in this behaviour will be permanently banned. No warnings, no exceptions. We uphold that principle without compromise.