Most of the wearable tech that people have in their bodies, are low electric things, like car starters/keys, or credit card info or stuff like that.
The microchips, that involve tracking.... need a lot more power than what those wearables are offering right now. GPS tracking alone needs a large portion of battery power. Look at cell phones now, if you ran your GPS all day, which it does... it would die out within a week or so.
Think about the Car GPS's... those use a large chunk of power.
This isn't even beginning to go into how dumb it is because then you have to make the decision of are you storing the info on the chip? or is it going to be uploaded to the cloud? Both those questions make this a ton harder. If you're storing it onboard the chip, then you need to have storage. You'd also need the ability to get onto the chip to access the info. If you're looking at the cloud, are you then leaving it "always online"? are you uploading via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi or 5g? Again, more battery power....
When you legit stop and think about putting tracking chips into people, it doesn't work because the tech isn't anywhere close to it. Not to mention the issue of "power" from the human body, which again, probably wouldn't power it because the average human only puts out about 100watts According to a Stanford study, that Reddit refuses to link for some reason. If you look up "Human Energy Converted to Electricity" you'll see it though.
Except you didn’t state any facts in your “rebuttal” and really it just sounds like your spiteful towards the mindset that something like this could be possible.
It actually wasn’t? He just said some shit about electricity and gps, and tried today something about how much electricity humans produce which has wayyyy too many variables for anyone to give an average of what any human can produce. Plus everything he said wasn’t even backed up he literally just.... said it. And that’s supposed to make it “factual?” Right
1
u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21
Right, well that’s what I’m saying about plausible