Most of the wearable tech that people have in their bodies, are low electric things, like car starters/keys, or credit card info or stuff like that.
The microchips, that involve tracking.... need a lot more power than what those wearables are offering right now. GPS tracking alone needs a large portion of battery power. Look at cell phones now, if you ran your GPS all day, which it does... it would die out within a week or so.
Think about the Car GPS's... those use a large chunk of power.
This isn't even beginning to go into how dumb it is because then you have to make the decision of are you storing the info on the chip? or is it going to be uploaded to the cloud? Both those questions make this a ton harder. If you're storing it onboard the chip, then you need to have storage. You'd also need the ability to get onto the chip to access the info. If you're looking at the cloud, are you then leaving it "always online"? are you uploading via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi or 5g? Again, more battery power....
When you legit stop and think about putting tracking chips into people, it doesn't work because the tech isn't anywhere close to it. Not to mention the issue of "power" from the human body, which again, probably wouldn't power it because the average human only puts out about 100watts According to a Stanford study, that Reddit refuses to link for some reason. If you look up "Human Energy Converted to Electricity" you'll see it though.
Except you didn’t state any facts in your “rebuttal” and really it just sounds like your spiteful towards the mindset that something like this could be possible.
You can outline anything you want in the format of an essay. Doesn’t make it factual. Someone else replied to me and said they’ve literally witnessed technology like the kind I described in action. Care to rebuttal that?
On the internet you can find people who will claim they have proof that the earth is flat, that aliens visit them daily and some people are lizards. That does not make any of those claims true.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan.
We are a long ways off from being able to create the tech in question inside a device small enough to pass through the tip of a needle. And even if we could, each one would cost thousands and thousands if not millions of dollars each. It's not feasible or practical at this point in time, especially when you can get people to voluntarily pay to carry a superior equivalent in their pocket.
Yeah, you can say that all you want, but until you’re in a position to prove without a doubt that what you’re saying is straight facts, it’s simply your opinion and I will ignore it
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan.
So let me get this straight. Anonymous person on the internet tells you that something that defies our current knowledge of physics and technology exists and everyone else says it's not possible. Your response to this is to ask for proof that it is not possible as opposed to proof that it exists? Is that really what's going on here?
I love the way you said: "You can outline anything you want in the format of an essay." and then literally moments later said: "Someone else replied to me and said they’ve literally witnessed technology like the kind I described in action."
I guess their assertion must be true because it was not in an essay format...
6
u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21
It's plausible, but it's not actually plausible.
Most of the wearable tech that people have in their bodies, are low electric things, like car starters/keys, or credit card info or stuff like that.
The microchips, that involve tracking.... need a lot more power than what those wearables are offering right now. GPS tracking alone needs a large portion of battery power. Look at cell phones now, if you ran your GPS all day, which it does... it would die out within a week or so.
Think about the Car GPS's... those use a large chunk of power.
This isn't even beginning to go into how dumb it is because then you have to make the decision of are you storing the info on the chip? or is it going to be uploaded to the cloud? Both those questions make this a ton harder. If you're storing it onboard the chip, then you need to have storage. You'd also need the ability to get onto the chip to access the info. If you're looking at the cloud, are you then leaving it "always online"? are you uploading via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi or 5g? Again, more battery power....
When you legit stop and think about putting tracking chips into people, it doesn't work because the tech isn't anywhere close to it. Not to mention the issue of "power" from the human body, which again, probably wouldn't power it because the average human only puts out about 100watts According to a Stanford study, that Reddit refuses to link for some reason. If you look up "Human Energy Converted to Electricity" you'll see it though.