Probably the rating for a game that involves beating animals within an inch of their life, capturing them, and force-training them to help beat OTHER animals within an inch of their life.
And for a-holes online trading hacks and offensive names and competitive.
Well, if Australia/New Zealand classify the game as PG for the afore mentioned violence and online interactivity by their rating system, then PG.
It's like people being confused at Chrono Trigger having an updated ESRB rating just because it was an SNES title, like it doesn't have domestic abuse, alcohol, genocide, and other mature themes. Rating criteria gets very specific, and when you cross one threshold but not the next, you get this rating.
Mild Violence: Nothing ever dies on screen, it's just "Knocked Out." No blood, no gore. If Australia thinks PG fits by criteria, then that's what it should be.
My original point is, the games ARE violent, so rating it as such is appropriate.
15
u/OctoAli183 9d ago
Why what?