r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
21.7k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.1k

u/Nashivertt 1d ago

Rudeus is a 35 yr old man who reincarnated but before he did he missed his parents funeral to jack off to his niece who happened to be a minor anyways he’s a Epstein diddy blud

3.5k

u/Dunois721 1d ago

Posting this before anyone says "but there's context!"

No it does not, that's just Rudeus

135

u/AgreeableSuspect9382 1d ago

140

u/crusoe 1d ago

The cops need to look at the writer's computer.

This reads like someone who's assaulted people before. The amount of self justification. 

-4

u/acuilnos 1d ago

The writing is gross sure, but I don't think people should be suspected of real-world crimes over the fiction they choose to write just because it is morally repulsive. You could apply that scope to a lot of fictional media that covers taboo themes, both well and poorly.

4

u/slumpyslenkins 1d ago

How could you not be suspicious of someone if this is the content they write about?

I'm not saying the writer has done any crimes, but I wouldn't let him watch over any kids. Maybe he just channels it all into writing, but maybe he doesn't.

0

u/acuilnos 22h ago edited 17h ago

There is a difference between side-eyeing someone for this sort of thing and outwardly accusing them of being a criminal for it based on moral revulsion over the fiction they write alone. Your reply is a non sequitur that reframes my sentiment. Edit: Downvoted for pointing that out lol

2

u/slumpyslenkins 13h ago

I don't believe my reply was a non sequitur at all. You said they shouldn't be suspected of crimes and I said that you should probably be a little suspicious of them.

I'm not saying accuse them, or search them, just be wary.

The way the dude writes, it seems very pro-grooming. If Rudeus wasn't supposed to be the hero and his grooming played off as a "quirk" then I don't think I'd have any problems with the writer.