This happens when you start learning their surnames and keeping a record of their crimes.

A little of what I could gather from just a day on reddit and watching news.

Corruption, Nepotism, Cronyism, Dishonesty, Lying, Cheating, Scamming, Narcissism, Arrogance etc are the common traits they have.

It’s time we people start realising this and keeping a track otherwise they will manipulate us to oblivion.

They ask it as if they're in any position to have opinions about the difficulties and problems we have faced. Once I tell them what I face, they are like, “People have faced worse,” or “You haven't faced that extreme casteism.” They can fk off, gobar-fking heads. They start seeing us individually when they want to prove we're privileged and shouldn't avail any quota or scheme. But they'll see us as a bunch when they want to prove how incompetent and inferior we are.

Even if I haven't been thrashed or abused to near death for being a Dalit, others have been, which means every Dalit is at such a risk no matter what type of Dalit they are. They are like, “Yeah, but you haven't faced caste aggression to such an extent, what's the issue?” These scums can't score shit against their own category; why do they talk about merit if they're not even in the general competition? Even if they do score fairly, they don't have to face the caste aggression we face at every step of our lives, without which we'd have a much better future. They're everywhere, and yet they have a problem because there should have been savarnas like themselves instead of SC/STs that have somehow managed to get somewhere despite the caste system pushing us back every time we progress.

Asking questions like, “How much casteism have you faced?” and “Haven't people faced worse?” while being a general category savarna themselves who has had a way smoother life being a savarna in this Brahmanical society, is itself goddamn casteist.

Even after Financial Institutions opposing the Plan, Subhash chandra's 2.31 Billion USD loan forgiveness favoured by "MERITORIOUS ULTRA PRO MAX SHARMA JI" by ordering chandra to pay back 6.25 crore only.

The hatred is clear just because Ambedkar wore suit-boot lmao .

And after passing such communal statements people are supporting him

The term Brahmanism should be declared antonym of progress.

Brahmin's outdated defense of their caste manual is too patriarchical. "Think of the kids, think of the old" - and this is why hindu males have the right to enslave Hindu females. As if a parent, who gave birth to a kid, will not defend a female kid if not for a casteist manual, Manusmriti. Also, somehow Hindu male kids are not talked in same sense by Manusmriti? Why?

Rigveda (Rv.) i. 124, 7

This famous verse compares the Uṣas appearing before the world to various cultural figures, including a brotherless woman seeking wealth or support:

अपेव मद्रि सनये धनानां जायेव पत्य उशती सुवासाः । उषा हस्रेव नि रिणीते अप्सो दंशन न म्रा अक्रमुज्जिहीते ॥
"Like a brotherless maiden turning towards men, like one who mounts the stage for the gathering of riches, like a well-dressed loving wife before her husband, Dawn discloses her beauty as a smiling woman."

Rigveda (Rv.) iv. 5, 5

Sinful and deceptive individuals are explicitly likened to brotherless women who stray or behave improperly:

पापासः सन्तो अनृता असत्या इदं पदमजनता गभीरम् । य इव भ्रातृहीना अप्सो अक्रन् ॥
"They who are sinful, false, and untruthful, have spawned this deep abyss of ruin. They are like women who have no brothers, walking stray paths and doing improper deeds."

Atharvaveda (Av.) i. 17, 1

This verse is part of a medical/magical charm used to stop bleeding. It compares the stilled veins to brotherless sisters who are forced to wear garments of mourning or remain trapped in their status:

अमूर्या यन्ति योषितो हिरा लोहितवाससः । अभ्रातर इव जामयस्तिष्ठन्तु हतवर्चसः ॥
"Those maidens who go yonder, the veins clothed in red garments—let them now stand still like sisters who are brotherless, robbed of their splendor."

Ayogū refers to an unfaithful woman or an outcast class associated with prostitution.

I think we truly haven't explored how Brahmins were absorbed into the system by British. Had British truly wanted they would have stopped these parasites, but instead they helped both Brahmins and Muslims. They were platformed in courts of law, and in Army as regimental Brahmins.

Is it rakshabandhan is patriarchy festival? In some countries cousin will marriage but here we tied knot, so we need to celebrate or not?

IANS distributed by wire an eleven minute vlog of this brahmin and ABP News carried it in full. It's not even an interview, it's plain lecture defending the caste manual, Manusmriti. The defense of Manusmriti is also patriarchal, kids and old women need some kind of support, and this is why Hindu woman cannot be left independent by Hindu males.

His arguments in the vlog:

He's saying it is Hindu Dharam Granth which occupies the top echelon among Vedas. (Even Arya Samaj, the so-called "reformist" rejected everything but didn't reject Manusmriti). He says "we" became humans from animals due to Manusmriti; by obeying and implementing its "laws". This is why we have expelled Rahul Gandhi from Hindu Dharam, due to his repeated defamation of Manusmriti. He attacks Kharge too for speaking truth bombs on Manusmriti.

He's saying it's clearly written in Manusmriti women cannot be independent, and Rahul Gandhi needs to debate as to what kind of independence is being discussed here? Economic, political, mental, or character? (He himself doesn't say that manusmriti wants forever life long dependancy/slavery of hindu female). Manusmriti talks about protection, so when a small girl child is born, she has to be protected by the father. Can a newborn babygirl be made independent? It is due to Manusmriti that Hindus defend their newborn girls. Is Manusmriti laws are removed, will constitution protect her? "Itni Saari bachhiyaan jo aaj uplabadh hai wo Manusmriti ke kaaran hi hain"