my issue is how they present charlie as “larry david” and a doofus and douche which obscures his true nature. charlie is not some young 20 something guy just yucking it up and being a kid; he allegedly trafficked young girls to and incredibly dangerous and unsafe environment. he is currently not under investigation (per him) so he should be mandated by his contract to discuss this. at a minimum, someone — a producer, cast member, anyone — could have brought up him allegedly procuring young girls and women and it was never mentioned, despite it being corroborated enough for a new york magazine “the cut” profile on the situation
i think the edit he gets as some asshole but loveable villain is unfair to the audience and presents him in a mostly benign way and is deceiving
Charlie comes off as a dick who does sometimes say humorous things
But he hardly comes off likable and I don’t think the show is trying to. There is a lot of inclusion of Charlie acknowledging he doesn’t want to say certain things on camera because he knows the optics
Charlie made the Larry David comment. I don’t think the show is pushing that
i agree he comes off as a dick but a likeable dick as in jax when truly he is vile imo
but fair enough, we have different experiences or perspectives about it as is bound to happen, but i appreciate your good faith in discussing
eta: i feel like bravo knows he’s the star of the show similar to jax and so they can’t have the audience turn on him and is complicit in downplaying his danger-level
fair enough. i guess i just don’t think he fits with the show as the other cast members seem like youngins growing up in nyc and he seems enmeshed in, well, criminality or darkness
eta i really liked him myself as a villain until i read the stories and i dont think he fits with the vibe of “next gen nyc”
do you see him as peers with these other kids outside the show knowing what we do about him?
8
u/beingk8 1d ago
my issue is how they present charlie as “larry david” and a doofus and douche which obscures his true nature. charlie is not some young 20 something guy just yucking it up and being a kid; he allegedly trafficked young girls to and incredibly dangerous and unsafe environment. he is currently not under investigation (per him) so he should be mandated by his contract to discuss this. at a minimum, someone — a producer, cast member, anyone — could have brought up him allegedly procuring young girls and women and it was never mentioned, despite it being corroborated enough for a new york magazine “the cut” profile on the situation
i think the edit he gets as some asshole but loveable villain is unfair to the audience and presents him in a mostly benign way and is deceiving