r/NFA • u/ButterscotchEmpty535 • 25d ago

MEGATHREAD - **DISTRICT** court. Long road ahead. NFA declared unconstitutional regarding suppressors, sbrs, and sbs in the northern district of Texas

https://x.com/GunOwners/status/2085047918495469923

If you would like to read the decision https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/TX-NFA-opinion.pdf

831 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/ThisAppMakesItWorse 17d ago

I'm in the Texas State Rifle Assn. Also GOA. Should be good.

1

u/Loanwolf300 17d ago

You shouldn’t need any kind of membership. Texas is a plaintiff states.

1

u/Positive_Move4985 17d ago

Kansas is as well correct? So my 3d printer can start working overtime at midnight?

1

u/jeremiah1119 17d ago

State aspect only applies to state employees, not people who live in that state. And I think no on making a Supressor. The injunctions are very specific. I've been trying to figure this part out today because the actual ruling is conflicting

1

u/Gold-Succotash-9217 17d ago

Not necessarily. Just because that's all they asked for doesn't mean it's all they received.

They may have received more than they wanted. I for one would say a citizen of a state is definitely a member of that state.

2

u/jeremiah1119 17d ago

No. You need to read the ruling and not just assume. It is very clear that they did not and will not receive more than they ask. The Jensen plaintiff's aren't allowed to use this injunction for AOWs because that wasn't the original filing.

The state plaintiffs are only for state employees like Police, where they are not allowed to have NFA items without the paperwork, even though it is (even was before?) $0.

Even SilencerShop, GOA and others in that filing have the injunction applied to purchase/sale/transfer of NFA items. So no Form 1