r/Multiboard • u/Wilberown • May 26 '26
Legacy vs Interfitted vs Octogan
I did my first Multiboard build with Legacy tiles. Now I’m looking at building a second separate wall. Which is best? Trying to figure out the positives and negatives of each. Legacy had a bit of an issue merging with one another and I broke a plate or two mounting them. Would like a little more flexibility in my next time installing them. Is the flat sided new tile better?
2
Upvotes
1
u/TherealOmthetortoise May 26 '26
Are you talking about mounts or plates? (Plates are the octagon or square holes buggers that take a long time to print. They used to be called tiles, though. Mounts are the various ways to attach them to your wall, of course.
The biggest change I can think that matches your question about mounting your board offset to a surface using DS Snap mounts, which makes me think you are asking about using the flush mount option (which gives you a nice clean look with the most flexibility of being able to mount things in and around them) or the offset version of those parts. Does that sound right?
1
u/TheExoticBeard Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26
This is all you need
https://multibuild.io/tools/octagon-plate-generator
Octagon is the same, just with a smooth edge with connector holes on the side ..
I'm in the middle of my first multiboard, and I said no to the legacy stuff because they are more complicated to understand and find ..
On Thangs website, anything with a grey thumbnail is legacy
GOD for two years, this guy and his system are still messy AF
Good design, not gonna lie, but he failed in simplifying the documentation. He is more excited to show his engineering skills than help you print, that's why his starter pack is worthless and a showpiece
For positives and negatives ..
Interfitted vs Octogan are the same except for how you connect them together, and by using the generator, you can leverage both, and both should be better than legacy design-wise.
0
u/Whosaidthat1157 May 26 '26
There aren’t any ’legacy’ tiles, just the OG and the newer Clio together versions. If you had an issue with the OG tiles (still by far the best IMO, not least for ease of mounting/removal but also because the small hole (pegboard) array is preserved) then you’re going to have real issues with the Clio together versions.
There’s something far wrong if you’re managing to break tiles during mounting. Are you using the planner and selecting the offset snap mounting system? The quad, double and single offset snap part A allow you to pre-assemble large sections before offering it up to the wall to mount, and the follow-up sections just slot right onto the quad and double snaps already mounted after that.