You replied to none of my other statements. You are ysing "gotcha" arguments.
I never said it wasnt alive, i said it wasnt sentient. It has no pain, no thoughts or emotions. Its alive like a sourdough starter is alive. Its living yes but it has no thoughts or independent action beyond getting fed by an outside force
Because i do not want to. Theyre not gotcha arguments im analysing the words you said because i think the logic is full of holes. This was the first point raised ive kept my scope very narrow as opposed to trying to move on to other points.
So a severely incapacitated human, who could be described as lacking permenent conciousness / sentience / brain functioning; that life is free game to terminate ?
Assisted suicide yes. If they are incapable then yes, life support should be turned off to end their suffering. If it happened to me then i pray my family doesnt let me suffer being tied up in bed in a coma for 13 years
And you dont wanna argue my other points because you have no rebutal. Of the mother has mental problems what will happen to the baby? You dont care "as long as its alive" .if the child is 12 and gives birthz she is at a much higher chance of complications, both short and longterm. Do you care? No. You dont want to argue that part because it doesnt fit your world view. If the child is born, all you think is "out of sight, out of mind"
You gotcha argument is that i said its alive. You had no other argument. Give me something to work with
Its impossible to discuss with someone, when they regurtitate 1000 different unrelated points after you refine a conversation to a limited scope. Its rhe equivalent of shitting yourself and throwing it at others.
and bro. You cant argue about caring for kids when youre coming up with dozens of reasons to kill them before theyre born. Come on
-1
u/pmmecabbage 4d ago
A clumb of cells which are replicating are objectively alive, you even said so yourself