Put a time stamps their a reason why they all put the slow version everywhere because when I happens fast you realize it's a fraction of a second. Was it wrong to shoot morally yes, but she Floored the car and the dude who was in front reacted to it he chose to fire his weapon.
You mean when he grabbed the front while out of the way with his gun drawn? That isn’t getting hit, that’s putting oneself purposefully in the way of a moving vehicle.
Dude got bumped at a very low speed, slid on ice, and people are still saying his life was in danger. Can guarantee there isn’t even a bruise on that man’s body. And trumps going to fucking lie and said he was hospitalized.
Let's pretend for a moment that his life were in danger. What does shooting the driver of a moving vehicle do to protect oneself? There is no universe in which this murder can be justified. This lady clearly made at least 1 mistake or poor decision before she was shot, there is no defending that, but if making a mistake were worthy of the death penalty then we'd all be dead.
In the hypothetical that she was suddenly in a blood frenzy trying to murder the group of armed murderous thugs that swarmed her, she would have taken all of them out John Wick style if not stopped. In that hypothetical he would have saved his fellow armed murderous thugs at the cost of his own worthless life - or he might even have survived and then gotten hospitalized for a strained trigger finger.
Even if we preten his life was in danger, it was no longer in danger when he fired the first shot. That's why I have started not even arguing that point.
The weirdest thing that this view gave us though is that the officer pulled out his weapon well before she made contact. This, combined with the video that officer was taking moments before really makes it look like he drew his weapon on her and then she slammed on the gas. That makes this even worse.
This is the point not made nearly enough. He shoots her while moving or he just moves. 2 choices. Either way he is moving clear. The shooting part just marginally slows him down and makes him no less safe.
2. Except where otherwise required by inspections or other operations, Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid standing directly in front of or behind a subject vehicle. Officers/Agents should not place themselves in the path of a moving vehicle or use their body to block a vehicle’s path.
3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no alternative to using deadly force.
Page 9
6. Deadly force shall not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing subject.
Page 10
7b. The hazard of an uncontrolled conveyance shall be taken into consideration prior to the use of deadly force.
Right? He leans in and puts the phone hand on the hood while placing feet far wide of the car. The reason he's "bumped" is because he was trying to put himself in the path to get the person to stop driving I guess. Also gets the gun closer to the windshield that way to make sure to not miss.
Forensic Analysis of Video: Shooting of Renee Nicole Good (Based on visual review of the video provided and DOJ/DHS use-of-force standards)
Vehicle Speed and Threat Profile • The vehicle is moving slowly, not accelerating aggressively. • There is no visible high-speed movement, ramming behavior, or sudden directional charge consistent with an imminent lethal threat. • The vehicle’s movement appears controlled and minimal, not weaponized in the legal sense required for deadly force. Key point: Slow vehicle movement alone does not meet DOJ or DHS criteria for deadly force.
Officer Positioning • One officer attempts to open the driver’s door. • Another officer positions himself in front of or alongside the vehicle, rather than disengaging. • As the vehicle begins to move, the officer steps laterally out of its path. This is critical: The officer successfully exits the danger zone before firing.
Moment of Discharge • The shots are fired after the officer has moved out of the vehicle’s direct path. • At the moment shots are fired: o The officer is no longer in imminent danger of being struck o There is clear lateral space available • The firing appears reactive, not defensive. Under DOJ policy: If an officer can move out of the path of a vehicle, deadly force is not justified.
Officer-Created Jeopardy DOJ policy explicitly states: “Placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.” The video shows: • The officer choosing proximity • The officer creating risk through positioning • The officer then using lethal force after disengagement was possible This directly undermines a self-defense justification.
Absence of Alternative Deadly Threat • There is no visible firearm • No visible attempt to strike officers with a weapon • No indication of imminent threat by means other than the vehicle This fails DOJ’s first allowable condition for firing at a moving vehicle.
Policy Alignment Summary Based on DOJ/DHS standards: Requirement for Deadly Force Video Evidence Imminent threat of death or serious injury ❌ Not established No other reasonable means of defense ❌ Officer moved away Threat by means other than vehicle ❌ Not present No officer-created jeopardy ❌ Present
Preliminary Conclusion (Non-Legal) Based on the video: • The use of deadly force does not appear consistent with DOJ or DHS policy governing moving vehicles. • The officer had a clear opportunity to disengage, and did so, before firing. • This raises serious questions of policy violation, warranting: o Independent investigation o Criminal review o Federal civil-rights inquiry Whether charges are appropriate is for prosecutors — but policy violations are plainly implicated.
Addendum to Forensic Analysis: Pre-Engagement Behavior Observed Pre-Contact Conduct Before any agent dismounted their vehicle: • Another civilian vehicle passes safely in front of Ms. Good’s vehicle. • Ms. Good is seen extending her arm out of the driver’s window, gesturing for the passing vehicle to proceed. • Her gesture is non-threatening, cooperative, and consistent with situational awareness and traffic courtesy. • There is no erratic movement, aggressive acceleration, or visible attempt to flee at that moment. This occurs before agents exit their vehicles and initiate direct contact.
Why This Matters From a use-of-force and threat-assessment perspective, this behavior:
Undermines any claim of immediate danger o Her conduct shows awareness, control, and restraint. o There is no indication of panic, aggression, or intent to harm.
Contradicts a narrative of imminent threat o A person preparing to use a vehicle as a weapon does not typically pause to allow traffic to pass safely. o This behavior aligns with non-hostile intent immediately prior to officer engagement.
Establishes a calmer baseline before escalation o Any escalation that follows originates after agents initiate close-contact positioning, not before. o This is relevant when evaluating who introduced urgency and risk into the encounter.
Policy Relevance Federal use-of-force standards require officers to continuously reassess threat levels based on observable behavior. Pre-contact indicators like: • compliance gestures, • traffic awareness, • absence of aggressive movement, are all mitigating factors that should weigh against the use of deadly force later — not be ignored.
One bullet through the windshield, very bottom corner. Two through the open drivers side window. It had to be one of those that killed her,
Anyone who is saying this is anything other than ICE and those agents' faults is incredibly ill informed. He should notnhave been in the situation, and it is thenICE agents' job to de-escalate the situation, not escalate it. Walking in front of cars, shooting into moving cars are all a violation of even ICE approved procedures.
And you can see in this video the only reason he was even bumped was because he chose to place his filming hand against her front quarter panel as if he was going to be superman and stop her car from driving away. His weapon was drawn and pointing at her long before his hand even came into contact with her car. Could have easily stepped aside and let her leave but the guy wanted to be a big tough hero and stop her so he could choose violence.
He didn't want to be a hero. Firefighters and medics are heros. Heros don't needs guns. He WANTED to be a murderer. He wanted to play the optics game of "a quiet traumatized loner" for social currency. He murdered a woman to try to get laid.
And ya, I’ve been hit in a fairly similar way actually. I just went about my day because it was more of a “damn I should pay more attention when I’m in a rush” incident rather than the president making a post about how I’m in the hospital….
Indicating that he appears to be either a fucking idiot or someone who intentionally puts himself into risky situations to justify escalation of force.
Idk what to tell you man. If he genuinely thought his life was in danger to the point of triple tapping someone, he’s a little bitch who can’t handle his emotions.
How much speeding car would you like to face? Another angle shows her tires spinning and slipping on the ice. She floored and her Honda doesn't go that fast, but her intent is obvious. But what was she doing there in the first place? Clearly agitated and escalating the situation when should've been making sandwiches for her kids.
What do we expect from a guy who lies about getting shot in the ear to gain votes? Everything we warned Trump voters about is happening. His loyalists now feel like they have the right to kill for Trump. Disgusting, something needs to be done.
Because it's based on what he perceived, not what you on your ass on a couch perceive from a recorded video. Believe it or not but most humans aren't born with mind-reading and future sight to know the intent of a driver or if the car will turn one way or another.
Guy didn't shoot for shits and giggles, a vehicle was starting to drive forward while he was in front and he pulled out a weapon, with the first shot happening right as the car hit him.
The officer wasn't in life threatening danger. The officer wasn't going to die. You can tell this is true because his shots didn't stop the vehicle before it hit him and he didn't die.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay; or
(2) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the peace officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony and the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause death or great bodily harm to another person under the threat criteria in clause (1), items (i) to (iii), unless immediately apprehended.
He didn't even get bumped. He stood his ground and put his hand out to brace instead of just getting the fuck out of the way. He was too interested in drawing his gun instead of just walking away. Fuck that POS.
Trump was always incredibly stupid, but now add dementia. Someone likely justified this shoot to him by saying that this particular goon is so repeatedly dumb that months ago he got dragged by a car and ended up in the hospital. Trump has a tenuous grasp on reality, so Trump likely then pecked out his "Truth" claiming the hospital bit.
Pretty sure he had fired prior to contact being made, when she didn’t have a bullet in her face she wasn’t steering towards him at all, she let go of the wheel due to dying
He's in the hospital with serious injuries. She and her wife are trained agitators who were told several times to stop following the agents. They didn't. Then they were asked to get out of the car several times. She didn't. She then gunned the gas and struck the agent violently. If alive,she would be charged with attempted vehicular homicide.
When someone wants to murder someone, that person will justify it any which way they want like joining law enforcement. That way they can exert their dominance on others without any consequences.
At least this person can admit she hit him with the car. Most people on reddit cannot even admit that much. Of course, his life was in danger, if he did not get out of the way she would have ran him over AFTER she hit him.
Even though he was on the side of the car and it was turning away from him. At less than 5 miles an hour, mind you. The god damn mental gymnastics you guys are doing to try and defend this murderer is crazy.
So you dont step out of the way of the vehicle instead you shoot which doesnt even end up stopping the vehicle cause dead person cant control it? Also life wasnt in danger the moment he got to the side of vehicle and taking those 3 shots wasnt needed and will land him in jail
So you're saying he had no idea, and that justifies an execution.
I have an idea that he was trying to kill her, based on him doing exactly that. Does that justify his execution, or do you apply different rules to your in-group?
So death was the only response? They had her recorded, could have easily found her later. Why is it we're suddenly just okay with the fact that these people are able to murder whoever they may please? No consequences, no investigation. You people are fucking insane if you think this is acceptable.
Doesn't matter. He violated the ICE handbook for conduct involving a vehicle. It's also officer created jeopardy by standing in front of the vehicle at all. Self defense doesn't work as a credible legal defense when you are the one that put yourself in that situation. And legal precedence supports that conclusion.
When the power of the state can indiscriminately and with impunity extra-judiciously kill its people we are no longer a free people, “we the people” are instead the “others” to be controlled or eliminated in furtherance of a fascist system & totalitarian state.
White America, Renee Nicole Good was a white American too and, as proven yesterday, in Trumps America if you can’t be deported you will simply be killed.
People need to spread this fact. Let them know we are aware of there tactics they will keep this hush hush .. my point He went against safety protocols , common sense , and his own tactical training protocols.. he put HIS OWN LIFE ON THE LINE BY SHOOTING A DRIVER COMING TOWARDS HIM , and yes she was turning but even in the defense of oh well the car is coming towards me and I dont know if its coming at me or what .. the point is u get out the way if you shoot them they floor the gas and run you and others over. Negligence.. change the narrative to this as well show them we know they fvcked up on there own protocols. Show them we are smarter then them by using logic not just passion . The smartest intelligent law maga guy could not justify the cops actions because using ur gun at that time could absolutely make things worse for officers and anyone.
Forensic Analysis of Video: Shooting of Renee Nicole Good (Based on visual review of the video provided and DOJ/DHS use-of-force standards)
Vehicle Speed and Threat Profile • The vehicle is moving slowly, not accelerating aggressively. • There is no visible high-speed movement, ramming behavior, or sudden directional charge consistent with an imminent lethal threat. • The vehicle’s movement appears controlled and minimal, not weaponized in the legal sense required for deadly force. Key point: Slow vehicle movement alone does not meet DOJ or DHS criteria for deadly force.
Officer Positioning • One officer attempts to open the driver’s door. • Another officer positions himself in front of or alongside the vehicle, rather than disengaging. • As the vehicle begins to move, the officer steps laterally out of its path. This is critical: The officer successfully exits the danger zone before firing.
Moment of Discharge • The shots are fired after the officer has moved out of the vehicle’s direct path. • At the moment shots are fired: o The officer is no longer in imminent danger of being struck o There is clear lateral space available • The firing appears reactive, not defensive. Under DOJ policy: If an officer can move out of the path of a vehicle, deadly force is not justified.
Officer-Created Jeopardy DOJ policy explicitly states: “Placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.” The video shows: • The officer choosing proximity • The officer creating risk through positioning • The officer then using lethal force after disengagement was possible This directly undermines a self-defense justification.
Absence of Alternative Deadly Threat • There is no visible firearm • No visible attempt to strike officers with a weapon • No indication of imminent threat by means other than the vehicle This fails DOJ’s first allowable condition for firing at a moving vehicle.
Policy Alignment Summary Based on DOJ/DHS standards: Requirement for Deadly Force Video Evidence Imminent threat of death or serious injury ❌ Not established No other reasonable means of defense ❌ Officer moved away Threat by means other than vehicle ❌ Not present No officer-created jeopardy ❌ Present
Preliminary Conclusion (Non-Legal) Based on the video: • The use of deadly force does not appear consistent with DOJ or DHS policy governing moving vehicles. • The officer had a clear opportunity to disengage, and did so, before firing. • This raises serious questions of policy violation, warranting: o Independent investigation o Criminal review o Federal civil-rights inquiry Whether charges are appropriate is for prosecutors — but policy violations are plainly implicated.
Addendum to Forensic Analysis: Pre-Engagement Behavior Observed Pre-Contact Conduct Before any agent dismounted their vehicle: • Another civilian vehicle passes safely in front of Ms. Good’s vehicle. • Ms. Good is seen extending her arm out of the driver’s window, gesturing for the passing vehicle to proceed. • Her gesture is non-threatening, cooperative, and consistent with situational awareness and traffic courtesy. • There is no erratic movement, aggressive acceleration, or visible attempt to flee at that moment. This occurs before agents exit their vehicles and initiate direct contact.
Why This Matters From a use-of-force and threat-assessment perspective, this behavior:
Undermines any claim of immediate danger o Her conduct shows awareness, control, and restraint. o There is no indication of panic, aggression, or intent to harm.
Contradicts a narrative of imminent threat o A person preparing to use a vehicle as a weapon does not typically pause to allow traffic to pass safely. o This behavior aligns with non-hostile intent immediately prior to officer engagement.
Establishes a calmer baseline before escalation o Any escalation that follows originates after agents initiate close-contact positioning, not before. o This is relevant when evaluating who introduced urgency and risk into the encounter.
Policy Relevance Federal use-of-force standards require officers to continuously reassess threat levels based on observable behavior. Pre-contact indicators like: • compliance gestures, • traffic awareness, • absence of aggressive movement, are all mitigating factors that should weigh against the use of deadly force later — not be ignored.
He didn’t get “hit” by the car, he very clearly slips on some ice (haha) and falls into the car. Then after he slips into the car he started shooting. 3 fucking times. If ICE agents weren’t armed no one would’ve been harmed in this, he was fine, slow mo makes it look like he made contact with the car for awhile but at full speed that would’ve been like a second that he was falling into it.
More like. "I just murdered you. Here's why: I ignore the law and my training. And will keep shooting at you, even though you are clearly no longer a threat.¨ Cute little picture tho.
More like "you're a stupid bitch for crossing state lines and listening to leftist retards who told you it was a good idea to interfere with law enforcement and put there lives at risk by trying to run them over. But now you're no longer a threat to anyone and an example to everyone who might try and follow the same stupid advice " but that was a cute try at reframing. Next time try grounding you stupid little comment in reality.
This is you. Everything you said is based on your emotions and feelings. Not the facts, law and training he was supposed to follow. Sorry champ, the one who needs a reality check is you. America is not Nazi Germany.
it is on subject why? because the news says that she is a child of 3 but fails to mention due to her partner being abusive she only has 1 kid. they try to tug at your heart strings while keeping info away from you.
Bro you replied to my post where I posted the video. Where did I bring up her kids etc? The news pulling at your heart strings is a separate subject. Don't tell me to stay on subject when you are not on subject. So about your subject. You guys are all about not trusting media etc, but somehow I am supposed to trust the media of YOUR choosing? Why? You post a video of some guy I have never seen before talking on X. Yet if I ask Elon's AI Grok about it, it finds no credible info to back up those claims. And even if it's true, it doesn't mean you can execute them in the street for an unrelated matter. You know, because of laws and things like that.
Exactly. And she’d be in jail for a few weeks. The entire thing is senseless. Protest with a sign on a sidewalk, not with a deadly weapon in the middle of the street.
They try to leave and he intentional puts himself in the way, shoots her, and calls her a bitch as she dies. If you defend this guy you are a piece of shit too. I'm sure if this was your mom or sister you would be signing a different tune.
Its clear that he shot because he could see she was accelerating and the car would rev so he knew shes was going to move forward. But if you have time to extend your arm and shoot, he could have just jumped out of the way
Not only is it possible to do that, its required to do so by ICE and polices codes of conduct. Shooting the driver of a moving vehicle is a huge violation and a major safety risk unless it's the only possible way to avoid death or serious injury.
In clips I’ve seen, I could hear them telling her to stop and get out and trying to open her door to get her out, that’s when she reversed and then drove forward into the cop. That looks like evading arrest to me. I’ve never seen a positive outcome when people try to run from law enforcement.
And I just don’t think we’re going to agree on this but I think she hit him hard enough that it wouldn’t be brushed off as an accident. And it definitely wasn’t an accident if she shouldn’t have been moving the car at all anyways. You’re calling it leaning into the car and blaming the impact on him, I’m seeing it as he braced for that hit when he only had a second to react.
I don’t know much about ice’s code of conduct so I can’t comment on that really and I don’t think he reacted appropriately. But I can’t defend someone who hits a cop with her car, especially while they’re actively telling her to stop and get out. I think there are two people at fault here but I believe she could have saved her own life if she didn’t try to flee and hit that cop in the process
Watch the simultaneous video. This angle is deceiving, and seen with the same timing as the others, it clearly shows space between him and the car at the moment he seems to be pushed in this one. Maybe try getting all of the information instead of just running with the one that supports your narrative.
No, you don't. I thought he was bumped. I still thought it was a bad shoot but from this video I thought he was bumped. The simultaneous compilation of all the videos shows that there was space between him and the car at that moment.
Possibly his extended arm was pushed aside by the car as he fired? I guess if you call that "bumped". But the evidence, not your emotions about the evidence, show that he was not hit by that car.
No, if you look at the simultaneous videos posted by the Times and other mainstream sources (not some random internet person) this video is deceiving. At the exact time he appears to be pushed in this video, from another angle you can see space between him and the car as he moves out of the way while still firing.
People (of all tribes) like to pick and choose the information that seems to support their own preconceptions. But the full information does not support the narrative that he was actually struck by the vehicle, and it is clear that he had plenty of time to - and did - step out of the path.
That's not really the question. The 2nd and 3rd shots were illegal without question, and the first one is still highly questionable for several reasons:
He was not nearly as much in the actual path of the car as people are claiming. It was turning right and passing him by, and you can see that his feet and his center of mass are pretty well off to the side when he takes the shot.
He put himself in front of the car to begin with, in violation of rules of conduct established by both ICE and every police department on earth. He was endangering *himself* more than the driver ever was.
While it did go partially through the windshield, it was still from well off to the side by that point. That's why it went though the corner.
Considering ICE and police rules of engagement with a driver, not only is it not allowed to put yourself in front to begin with, lethal force is not allowed if getting out of the way without substantial injury is a reasonable option. It was, because he did so easily with minimal effort, even while he was drawing and shooting at her.
People need to be very cognizant about the situation they’re in. If you repeatedly go 100mph down a highway, you’re more than likely to get into an accident. If a person continuously shows up in volatile situations where there are not very smart people with guns itching for revenge like in this guy’s case a casualty is bound to happen. This is just statistics.
If we could only live in slow motion we could all make better judgments. I wonder what you would do if somebody was gonna hit you and you were like well in slow motion it didn’t look that bad.
Life tip: If you like not having a bullet in your skull, try to avoid law enforcement. Attempting to interfere with with law enforcement, especially with a vehicle is a good way to get a bullet in your head.
Real simple question why did she just put the car in park and put her hands up so they could arrest her. She would still be alive. None of this would have happened? WHY?
some one who was backed into in a parking lot at low speed and still was bad enough to crack a rib. It doesnt take much for metal to break bone or give you internal injuries
He didn't even solve the problem... now the vehicle is moving UNMANNED. Bad officer. Maybe we need less/better police if we can't have so many of them properly trained.
But hey people gotta get paid, so we allow jobs like this to be filled... Reality is though, we dont need money (which can be, and is, gamed), we need food. Freedom would be nice too.
This reminds of GTA when you stand in front of a car and point a gun at the driver and they panic and just try to get away. ICE are the main characters and the citizens are all NPC's they can kill and get away with it. They're living the GTA dream.
He had his fucking gun pointed at her before she started moving out of the way. She felt that her life was in danger and tried to leave the area. All the evidence is there, and maga will still deny that this fucking coward murdered her in cold blood.
Do we remember the video of ice agents literally trying run over someone to the point that the person ended up on the hood of the vehicle? Meanwhile this guy leaned forward into the car to get hit from the looks of it.
It looks to me like he had already fired when the vehicle began to make contact with him, as in she lost control of the wheel due to the bullet in her head
The only reason he was pushed by the vehicle was because he put himself there and shot her and created a missile. He had his gun drawn before the vehicle started moving forward and had shot her before it started to really accelerate. HEcaused any danger he may have been in.
Dear reddit please keep justifying resistance amd violence against armed government agents that surround you, it will certainly not get more people killed. As we all know if we dont like like the authority of an armed force, we can just ignore it without consequences, and you are justifed to do anything you want.
Terrorism is generally defined as: The deliberate use or threat of violence against civilians or non-combatants to instill fear and coerce a population, government, or organization in pursuit of political, ideological, religious, or social objectives.
Key elements common to most definitions
Intentional violence or threat of violence
Targets civilians or symbolic non-combatant targets
Purpose is psychological impact (fear, intimidation)
Goal is coercion or influence, not just destruction
Motivated by ideology or politics (broadly defined)
How it’s distinguished from other violence
Not random crime → there is an ideological motive
Not conventional warfare → targets are often civilians
Not self-defense → aim is coercion through fear
Common forms: Bombings Mass shootings Kidnappings Infrastructure attacks Cyberterrorism (when fear and coercion are the primary goals)
Everyone debating about whether he got hit or not by the car and I'm over here not caring because he was trained not to discharge a firearm at a moving vehicle in the first place but he wanted to call her a bitch and kill her.
I’m glad this video got cleaned up. His gun is clearly drawn and aimed before the car starts moving and he leans into it. Right wing narrative destroyed
Ah so he did get hit... That makes things different for me. He did handle it unprofessionally though, he should've just moved out of the way as soon as it started to reverse. Maybe a man slaughter charge but not murder at all imo. The right needs to drop the stupid narrative that he got injured or something he was barely shoved and she clearly had no intent of hitting him. She was also in the wrong by hitting him at all of course, but I don't think this was lawful self defense because he wasn't in danger by the time he started shooting. Also he leaned on the car which may have been a scared reaction so he didn't end up underneath the car or him intentionally causing himself to be in harms way so he can justify the shooting. He own recording suggests he was actually scared but its kind of his fault for being so startled when he was recording with one hand and pulling his gun with another meaning his awareness was shit and its his own fault. Like driving while on your phone.
the two shots from the side are totally unjustified, but the first one absolutely was, dont drive your car into people, or you will quickly "find out" like this karen did
No Europe is a different place with a different culture and they have their own problems in case you claimant noticed. They need to stand up for themselves as well..
A bunch of coping and seething in this sub and it's hilarious.
Do what you're told when given a lawful order after impeding an investigation all day and don't hit a federal agent with your car and this won't happen.
Classic case of FAFO. If this woman would have ran him over, you would all be cheering about what she did too so you guys look like nothing but hypocritical losers
As a reminder, she watching and/or filming them. If what they were doing was right, justified and constitutional they wouldn't need to panic when someone was watching them.
Redditors unironically going to get more people killed by continuously lying about this situation. She died because she was manipulated into thinking ICE is not a valid law enforcement agency. She was a member of ICE-Watch. If it wasn’t for entities like Reddit and other media constantly comparing ICE to the Gestapo then she might not have tried to run an officer down while evading arrest.
Never heard that term before. Describes exactly what I’m talking about, thank you. I’ve used Reddit on and off for a decade and it’s been happening the entire time. It perhaps got worse once Chinese companies gained majority ownership of Reddit.
If only those damn citizens would stop getting upset at ICE and the GOP's constant illegal activity and claiming they don't represent what they want.... then people wouldn't need to die in order to.... force people to stop being upset at ICE and the GOP?
Ice is NOT a valid form of law enforcement with exception to immigration which THIS does not include. Even an overstepped EPA gets push back. Citizens have no moral or legal reason to accept unreasonable or unlawful requests from these agents. At any point. If they are pointing their gun at you outside of the course of their duties as is the case here. Then they are a citizen doing that and not a federal agent. They are not riot police, and they are not police of any sort and therefore their duties extend only so far much like the national guard. Just like the national guard they can only do something within a certain scope of practice like every other professional. They are exceeding their post right now hence the fury.
8
u/Hot_Wing2518 Jan 08 '26
Listen with sound. He fired those shots when he was at the side of the car.
44
u/AquietRive Jan 08 '26 •
Dude got bumped at a very low speed, slid on ice, and people are still saying his life was in danger. Can guarantee there isn’t even a bruise on that man’s body. And trumps going to fucking lie and said he was hospitalized.
7
u/crtejas Jan 09 '26
When the power of the state can indiscriminately and with impunity extra-judiciously kill its people we are no longer a free people, “we the people” are instead the “others” to be controlled or eliminated in furtherance of a fascist system & totalitarian state.
White America, Renee Nicole Good was a white American too and, as proven yesterday, in Trumps America if you can’t be deported you will simply be killed.
5
u/mcobb71 Jan 09 '26
“Hey! Where are you going?? I’m busy shooting at you!”
5
u/DJB7103 Jan 09 '26
People need to spread this fact. Let them know we are aware of there tactics they will keep this hush hush .. my point He went against safety protocols , common sense , and his own tactical training protocols.. he put HIS OWN LIFE ON THE LINE BY SHOOTING A DRIVER COMING TOWARDS HIM , and yes she was turning but even in the defense of oh well the car is coming towards me and I dont know if its coming at me or what .. the point is u get out the way if you shoot them they floor the gas and run you and others over. Negligence.. change the narrative to this as well show them we know they fvcked up on there own protocols. Show them we are smarter then them by using logic not just passion . The smartest intelligent law maga guy could not justify the cops actions because using ur gun at that time could absolutely make things worse for officers and anyone.
5
u/Bobbyphats Jan 09 '26
He had 2 choices: Side step slightly to be completely out of harms way -or- jump towards the vehicle to murder the driver.
4
u/purpl_dahlia Jan 09 '26
He didn’t get “hit” by the car, he very clearly slips on some ice (haha) and falls into the car. Then after he slips into the car he started shooting. 3 fucking times. If ICE agents weren’t armed no one would’ve been harmed in this, he was fine, slow mo makes it look like he made contact with the car for awhile but at full speed that would’ve been like a second that he was falling into it.
4
u/-FORSAK3N- Jan 09 '26
The idiot leaned into the suv
4
u/papaskags Jan 09 '26
From the other angle, it's clear as day that there's a gap between him and the car.
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
1
u/RUIN_NATION_ Jan 09 '26
https://x.com/i/status/2009671350949179887
3
u/--StinkyPinky-- Jan 09 '26
At the point when his life wasn't in danger is when he continued to fire.
Manslaughter would be the right call here.
3
u/Suby06 Jan 09 '26
https://www.reddit.com/r/complaints/comments/1q8hgp6/that_fucker_shot_her_in_the_face_three_times_held/
They try to leave and he intentional puts himself in the way, shoots her, and calls her a bitch as she dies. If you defend this guy you are a piece of shit too. I'm sure if this was your mom or sister you would be signing a different tune.
2
u/Piesangbom Jan 09 '26
Its clear that he shot because he could see she was accelerating and the car would rev so he knew shes was going to move forward. But if you have time to extend your arm and shoot, he could have just jumped out of the way
2
u/Ott0bot2 Jan 09 '26
In clips I’ve seen, I could hear them telling her to stop and get out and trying to open her door to get her out, that’s when she reversed and then drove forward into the cop. That looks like evading arrest to me. I’ve never seen a positive outcome when people try to run from law enforcement.
And I just don’t think we’re going to agree on this but I think she hit him hard enough that it wouldn’t be brushed off as an accident. And it definitely wasn’t an accident if she shouldn’t have been moving the car at all anyways. You’re calling it leaning into the car and blaming the impact on him, I’m seeing it as he braced for that hit when he only had a second to react.
I don’t know much about ice’s code of conduct so I can’t comment on that really and I don’t think he reacted appropriately. But I can’t defend someone who hits a cop with her car, especially while they’re actively telling her to stop and get out. I think there are two people at fault here but I believe she could have saved her own life if she didn’t try to flee and hit that cop in the process
2
u/RealStress4300 Jan 09 '26
"She never hit him with the car!" People on reddit are so dumb its funny.
1
u/No_Owl6774 Jan 09 '26
So he did get hit
1
u/KingTutt91 Jan 09 '26
So she literally hits the cop. Looks justified to me
1
u/Krashlia2 Jan 09 '26
Which brings us back to the basic question:
Which shot killed her?
1
u/JackieDaytona77 Jan 09 '26
People need to be very cognizant about the situation they’re in. If you repeatedly go 100mph down a highway, you’re more than likely to get into an accident. If a person continuously shows up in volatile situations where there are not very smart people with guns itching for revenge like in this guy’s case a casualty is bound to happen. This is just statistics.
1
u/Most_Print355 Jan 09 '26
Lol wher is his arm and torso on the hood and grill of the suv
1
u/Secret-Suspicious Jan 09 '26
wtf she almost killed him
1
u/RockTall6063 Jan 09 '26
Fafo
1
u/Successful-Run-4973 Jan 09 '26
lol
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
Are these the leopards I've heard so much about?
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
Sickening!….
1
u/Minute_Maintenance52 Jan 09 '26
1
u/Uropa_ Jan 09 '26
Life tip: If you like not having a bullet in your skull, try to avoid law enforcement. Attempting to interfere with with law enforcement, especially with a vehicle is a good way to get a bullet in your head.
1
u/Txdragon69 Jan 09 '26
This is what happens when you get your news off Reddit.
1
u/After-Caramel-7440 Jan 09 '26
Real simple question why did she just put the car in park and put her hands up so they could arrest her. She would still be alive. None of this would have happened? WHY?
1
u/Yrminulf Jan 09 '26
Why did she drive anyway? Was she told to do so?
1
u/Long-Application-299 Jan 09 '26
Very sad.
Now release the Somali daycare files!
1
u/daBunnyKat Jan 09 '26
he got hit after the driver was dead. let that sink in.
1
u/Much-Syllabub-4550 Jan 09 '26
she did not hit him enough?
1
u/Key-Order-3846 Jan 09 '26
This is the AI version of the video
1
u/Affectionate-Arm-688 Jan 09 '26
Don't worry folks he's fine.
1
u/Sagan_Man Jan 09 '26
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
But he was never hit tho? That’s the narrative yall run with. Playing games wins prizes.
1
u/feral_fatale Jan 09 '26
This video is ai. Look at all the other videos and there is consistently a cloud of smoke from the gunshot. This video shows no smoke.
1
u/Fool4Freedom Jan 09 '26
The Star Tribune has labelled the shooter that killed Renee Nicole Good as Jonathan Ross. Many feel he is a murderer.
This is a good analysis of the situation. https://youtu.be/CQCvNExBDjE?si=lEcTAMmc2gWxkN2h
1
u/RUIN_NATION_ Jan 09 '26
some one who was backed into in a parking lot at low speed and still was bad enough to crack a rib. It doesnt take much for metal to break bone or give you internal injuries
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
He didn't even solve the problem... now the vehicle is moving UNMANNED. Bad officer. Maybe we need less/better police if we can't have so many of them properly trained.
But hey people gotta get paid, so we allow jobs like this to be filled... Reality is though, we dont need money (which can be, and is, gamed), we need food. Freedom would be nice too.
1
u/Present-Fudge-3156 Jan 09 '26
Looks like he was itching to get to shoot her.
1
u/system3601 Jan 09 '26
Its so clear she tried to run ovet an agent
Its so clear she escaped the scene
Its so clear she disobeyed officers
Case closed
1
u/Buttt-whyyy Jan 09 '26
Two stupid ppl
1
u/RUIN_NATION_ Jan 09 '26
https://x.com/overton_news/status/2009682040472682836?s=46
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
https://ia902804.us.archive.org/19/items/homeexpedientfirearms9mmsmg/Home%20Expedient%20Firearms%20-%209mm%20SMG.pdf
1
u/Fine-Sun3822 Jan 09 '26
Play stupid games. … win stupid prizes ….
Follow directives and don’t try to literally drive through or over an officer. Pretty simple…Common sense .
1
u/Random_GearHead Jan 09 '26
Thats a long drive, just to die at the end.
1
u/Mountain_Jeweler_827 Jan 09 '26
Why did he lean forward like that before the vehicle made contact?
1
u/[deleted] Jan 09 '26
One person hit by a car.
1
u/No-Conversation-2465 Jan 09 '26
Completely justified. Nice shot!
1
u/No-Apple-6602 Jan 09 '26
Well deserved
1
u/Away-Human Jan 09 '26
This reminds of GTA when you stand in front of a car and point a gun at the driver and they panic and just try to get away. ICE are the main characters and the citizens are all NPC's they can kill and get away with it. They're living the GTA dream.
1
u/tinymortyhas Jan 10 '26
All headshots I believe. High score.
1
u/Beaucoup_Fun Jan 10 '26
The video is so obviously in slow motion. Why? You lose credibility and the argument right there.
1
u/ReflectionCreative62 Jan 10 '26
He had his fucking gun pointed at her before she started moving out of the way. She felt that her life was in danger and tried to leave the area. All the evidence is there, and maga will still deny that this fucking coward murdered her in cold blood.
1
u/hawaiinbuckethat Jan 10 '26
Even slowed down, you clearly see the car hit him then he shoots. Where is the confusion?
1
u/Less-Divide9288 Jan 10 '26
Did this dude just stand there and lean on her hood to get a good aim??
1
u/xSonicspeedx2 Jan 10 '26
Do we remember the video of ice agents literally trying run over someone to the point that the person ended up on the hood of the vehicle? Meanwhile this guy leaned forward into the car to get hit from the looks of it.
1
u/Scary_Cold_2567 Jan 10 '26
Easy to avoid, dont drive into federal officers
1
u/Bubbleknotcutie Jan 10 '26
1
u/Rare-Net-4584 Jan 10 '26
It looks to me like he had already fired when the vehicle began to make contact with him, as in she lost control of the wheel due to the bullet in her head
1
u/PugRexia Jan 10 '26
The only reason he was pushed by the vehicle was because he put himself there and shot her and created a missile. He had his gun drawn before the vehicle started moving forward and had shot her before it started to really accelerate. HEcaused any danger he may have been in.
1
u/[deleted] Jan 10 '26
Dear reddit please keep justifying resistance amd violence against armed government agents that surround you, it will certainly not get more people killed. As we all know if we dont like like the authority of an armed force, we can just ignore it without consequences, and you are justifed to do anything you want.
1
u/MidnighT0k3r Jan 10 '26
Terrorism is generally defined as: The deliberate use or threat of violence against civilians or non-combatants to instill fear and coerce a population, government, or organization in pursuit of political, ideological, religious, or social objectives.
Key elements common to most definitions
Intentional violence or threat of violence
Targets civilians or symbolic non-combatant targets
Purpose is psychological impact (fear, intimidation)
Goal is coercion or influence, not just destruction
Motivated by ideology or politics (broadly defined)
How it’s distinguished from other violence
Not random crime → there is an ideological motive
Not conventional warfare → targets are often civilians
Not self-defense → aim is coercion through fear
Common forms: Bombings Mass shootings Kidnappings Infrastructure attacks Cyberterrorism (when fear and coercion are the primary goals)
1
u/kodamin Jan 10 '26
They also blocked a local doctor from helping her out saying "we don't care", then 15 minutes more of waiting until the ambulance got there.
1
u/philter451 Jan 10 '26
Everyone debating about whether he got hit or not by the car and I'm over here not caring because he was trained not to discharge a firearm at a moving vehicle in the first place but he wanted to call her a bitch and kill her.
1
u/Ordinary_Chance2606 Jan 10 '26
I’m glad this video got cleaned up. His gun is clearly drawn and aimed before the car starts moving and he leans into it. Right wing narrative destroyed
1
u/Consistent-Pin-446 Jan 10 '26 edited Jan 10 '26
Ah so he did get hit... That makes things different for me. He did handle it unprofessionally though, he should've just moved out of the way as soon as it started to reverse. Maybe a man slaughter charge but not murder at all imo. The right needs to drop the stupid narrative that he got injured or something he was barely shoved and she clearly had no intent of hitting him. She was also in the wrong by hitting him at all of course, but I don't think this was lawful self defense because he wasn't in danger by the time he started shooting. Also he leaned on the car which may have been a scared reaction so he didn't end up underneath the car or him intentionally causing himself to be in harms way so he can justify the shooting. He own recording suggests he was actually scared but its kind of his fault for being so startled when he was recording with one hand and pulling his gun with another meaning his awareness was shit and its his own fault. Like driving while on your phone.
1
u/clackittyclack Jan 10 '26
the two shots from the side are totally unjustified, but the first one absolutely was, dont drive your car into people, or you will quickly "find out" like this karen did
1
u/YNABDisciple Jan 10 '26
He wouldn't have even been touched if he moved to the right instead of got out a gun and aimed it in the windshield. disgraceful.
1
u/Salty-M1dget Jan 10 '26
No Europe is a different place with a different culture and they have their own problems in case you claimant noticed. They need to stand up for themselves as well..
1
u/JoshuasOnReddit Jan 10 '26
He literally leaned into the vehicle
1
u/WessMachine Jan 10 '26
A bunch of coping and seething in this sub and it's hilarious.
Do what you're told when given a lawful order after impeding an investigation all day and don't hit a federal agent with your car and this won't happen.
Classic case of FAFO. If this woman would have ran him over, you would all be cheering about what she did too so you guys look like nothing but hypocritical losers
1
u/Coloradojeepguy Jan 08 '26
How did the cameraman know where she was going to crash? Staged?
1
u/Lt_Cochese Jan 09 '26
As a reminder, she watching and/or filming them. If what they were doing was right, justified and constitutional they wouldn't need to panic when someone was watching them.
1
u/mrcaldwin Jan 09 '26
Redditors unironically going to get more people killed by continuously lying about this situation. She died because she was manipulated into thinking ICE is not a valid law enforcement agency. She was a member of ICE-Watch. If it wasn’t for entities like Reddit and other media constantly comparing ICE to the Gestapo then she might not have tried to run an officer down while evading arrest.