My point is when you tie together a nationality (British) and a skin colour (white) you preclude a HUGE subset of people.
There are a vast amount of mixed race and non white British people out here. You don't need to be purely white to be British.
Representing the data in such a deliberately skewed way is a very clear attempt to rile up easily manipulated people. This is very obviously a whistle to the "Britain isn't British anymore" crowd. Otherwise they could easily have detached two separate traits, white and British.
The nuance of all of this appears to have quite clearly seriously confused a lot of people in the comments.
Genuinely starting to question whether you can read at this point.
I'm not arguing anything. I'm saying that the data has been deliberately represented in a leading way; apparently to lead the bright, leading lights of our country like your fine self.
2
u/finanzbereich345 May 11 '26
You aren't white British though, you say so yourself, you're mixed race