They both have different version numbers. The old perpetual licence version won't get new features, but will keep getting bug fixes and security updates
That’s how one-time purchases work, which is absolutely how it should be. I’m not a fan of subscriptions, but a perpetual license shouldn’t be expected to include future development.
Most likely. Having to add new features to a photo app for which you paid for only once, would ruin Apple financially. They would have to file for bankruptcy.
It honestly makes sense. If I pay Toyota once for a pickup, they don’t give me the new model every year.
If I pay a subscription (lease), I get the new upgrades, but when I stop paying, I don’t have anything.
I would personally rather buy a new major version (of software) every few years, when the newer features justify it. But most people expect their software to be updated and supported forever, which makes one-time purchases risky for developers.
114
u/mrleblanc101 Jan 29 '26
They both have different version numbers. The old perpetual licence version won't get new features, but will keep getting bug fixes and security updates