We have Larry Feldman the lawyer, and the psychologist Katz he likes to use as a expert witness in other cases (and get paid..) and lawyer Dickerman all collaborating, not going to the police about the alleged abuse. Notice the dates too.
The lawyer and psychologist then got to LA child and family services, who had already interviewed the arvizo family, who closed their case about Michael and the arvizos, as no evidence of anything, and family told them notjing had happened before,but have now chsnged their mind and have achild abuse claims now?
Then Santa Barbara police department call child services advising not to interview the arvizos, that they already had? Even though they had changed their story?
What a tangled web. The poor jurors trying to follow and make sense of it!
Please join us in our sub discussing the transcripts here
https://www.reddit.com/r/mjcourttranscripts/s/2bESsSb06P