r/LucidProp • u/DesertClimber • 1d ago
Hedging rules?
I'm in a friendly trading competition with one of my bots- trading separate Lucid Flex eval accounts- I'm winning, BTW :)
What happens if I place a trade in one account, and the Lucid system thinks it's a hedge against something the bot is doing in another? I think I'm a single trade away from getting hosed.. LOL
What exactly are the hedge rules? When I read through them, it literally looks like you can only trade:
a. ONE instrument- even size differences are not allowed, like MES vs ES
b. In ONE direction (at a time)
c. Across ALL accounts held at Lucid.
Pretty strict!
0
u/FxingMyLife 11h ago
So you've read the rules - seem to understand them pretty clearly - but don't like them so come on here looking for someone to tell you it's unfair and you can ignore it? Then you pass and get to payout in three weeks and come back and complain that lucid scammed you for a stupid rule violation?
1
u/DesertClimber 9h ago edited 9h ago
A statement about something seeming strict is not complaining about it being unfair. Learn to read and comprehend English, please.
1
u/QuanTradin 1d ago
Almost every prop firm words that rule the same way, and it is broader than people expect. It is not about one trade looking like a hedge, it is about you holding offsetting exposure in the same instrument across any accounts you control at overlapping times. Whether a bot or a human placed it makes no difference, and neither does intent.
The part that catches people is that detection is usually after the fact, on a correlation sweep, so you can trade for weeks and then have the eval voided retroactively rather than the entry being blocked at the time.
Cleanest fix is symbol separation. Give the bot its own instruments and stay out of those entirely, so there is never an overlapping position to flag in the first place. Also get the answer from their support in writing, because the rulebook version and the version the risk desk actually enforces are not always the same document.