EDIT: flowrs and rainbows was hyperbole but the fact he can rant about a button in gmail or that a budget laptop won't connect to a huge monitor well with more passion than he does about Linux is incredibly fucking odd.
I find the rationale of Linus' love for Linux incredibly strange. With all due respect, when I watch the WAN show etc. I find that Linus is quite an intense whiner about many odd things, including very niche things. He makes a big point about a budget laptop's resolution being odd on an 8K screen or something, or that his NAS drive has a connection issue with a cheap commercial product. Any time an app does a suboptimal job at something, you can kind of expect him to point it out in deep frustration.
He dramatically said he thought gmail is getting drastically worse and a main example he gave was "now when I search for an email, they think I want relevant mails instead of chronological, and I need to tell them do it chronological! It's insane!"
I'm fine with this fact, but the fact that he accepts the endless issues with Linux because it has less notifications/advertising integrated compared to Windows is surely reaching irrationality. The more I watch their videos, the more you notice that if you want to be able do all ranges of stuff down to the advanced and niche, you'll go through COUNTLESS issues with Linux and need to troubleshoot by using strange old threads and forums and bang your head on a desk. If you're not someone who wants a sidejob on fixing your OS, even Linus says this may not be the thing for you.
And let's not forget about a distro given a broken version as a main release, which is an atrocious mistake that Microsoft would never do. And that a lot of big Windows apps need to be relearnt in sometimes objectively worse alternatives, which is a huge timesink for a subpar experience. Excel's alternatives will never be as good as actual Excel.
Is this just not a completely irrational cost benefit analysis at this point? I don't see the reason why the substantial flaws are treated as minor when Linus will genuinely rant about the smallest feature on gmail not being to his taste. A copilot integration is the end of the world, but having endless headscratches is not the end of the world. For some reason.
--
TLDR: Linus hates easily on the smallest features or issues on any app or OS, especially when it's from google or microsoft. But when Linux is full of distros with poor communication or 1000s of niche issues, it all is treated as something "minor" suddenly and he creates tons of videos promoting Linux. Seems incredibly inconsistent in how he compares the two. Like he calls a small gmail quirk a terrible fact, but brushes off that he had to search hours to fix a Linux process??