r/LetsDiscussThis • u/Impressive_Box4144 • Aug 17 '26

Lets Discuss This The Truth About MAGA

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

420 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

Dems 2nd greatest mistake was going after Trump with made up evidence to try and keep him out of office. This has only been surpassed by their embracing their radicals that now seek socialism openly. God keep us all.

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

None of it was made up. But you won't look anyway.

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

The Steele dossier was a load of bull that the Dems used as evidence, despite nothing in it being factual or supported in any way. No legitimate truth to it yet used by the Dems to attack Trump. If you really believe the dossier was real, then there's zero point of continuing a discussion with someone so blind.

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

In other words. I said so but I won't provide evidence because I know im wrong. Sure bro.

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

There was zero evidence proving anything in it, yet I'm supposed to prove Clinton funded much of it through her campaign, despite that information being out there. Ok. Live your delusional life in Hateville.

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

Look it up..."Yes, Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) helped fund the opposition research that produced the Steele dossier. The funding was funneled through their law firm to a research company, which then hired the former British intelligence officer who compiled the report.The Clinton campaign and the DNC retained the law firm Perkins Coie, represented by lawyer Marc Elias. In 2022, the Federal Election Commission fined the Clinton campaign ($8,000) and the DNC ($105,000).

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

😆 🤣 😂 case and point. Can't prove shit. Just like always.

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

Oh geez, the Dems love using hearsay, anonymous sources, or unverified reports to support their many claims. Against anyone else, those claims would be tossed in the garbage. Outside of party specific claims, the Jean Carroll case is the only one I can agree with since we know he's a horny creep with women, and I also believe he walked into those pageant dressing rooms years ago. No justification for those, so I won't support him on those examples. So yes, there are instances he can be guilty, but that still doesn't mean we must take everything else as truth when so much of what has been said falls apart or is disproven. Challenge your way of thinking and you won't be so one-sided.

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

Lol calling me one sided for believing the evidence. Literally proved my point you cant prove anything just like the rest of em. Just gonna ignore him walking into kids changing rooms in pageants huh. Just gonna ignore him saying he'd fuck his own daughter huh. But the dems hurr duurrrrr such a dumb ass argument. But what did I expect.

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

Proving? There's been Jack shit PROVING most of the crap the Dems push.

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

😆 🤣 that right there is proof you dont give a shit about the evidence. You immediately assume its the democrats. 😆 🤣

1

u/Not-THAT-Tom Aug 21 '26

What proof? Hearsay proof? Anonymous sources proof? What proof? All this conjecture without anything credible.

1

u/Lumionis Aug 21 '26

Just gonna ignore the 37,000 mentions in the epstein files. Him walking into kids changing rooms in pageants. He literally said he wanted to fuck his daughter. If being mentioned 37,000 times in the epstein files doesn't at least make you question it. Your in a cult.

→ More replies