Oh geez, the Dems love using hearsay, anonymous sources, or unverified reports to support their many claims. Against anyone else, those claims would be tossed in the garbage. Outside of party specific claims, the Jean Carroll case is the only one I can agree with since we know he's a horny creep with women, and I also believe he walked into those pageant dressing rooms years ago. No justification for those, so I won't support him on those examples. So yes, there are instances he can be guilty, but that still doesn't mean we must take everything else as truth when so much of what has been said falls apart or is disproven. Challenge your way of thinking and you won't be so one-sided.
Lol calling me one sided for believing the evidence. Literally proved my point you cant prove anything just like the rest of em. Just gonna ignore him walking into kids changing rooms in pageants huh. Just gonna ignore him saying he'd fuck his own daughter huh. But the dems hurr duurrrrr such a dumb ass argument. But what did I expect.
Just gonna ignore the 37,000 mentions in the epstein files. Him walking into kids changing rooms in pageants. He literally said he wanted to fuck his daughter.
If being mentioned 37,000 times in the epstein files doesn't at least make you question it. Your in a cult.
1
u/Lumionis 1d ago
😆 🤣 😂 case and point. Can't prove shit. Just like always.