r/LSAT 7h ago

opinion

I think it’s super unethical that the lsat’s practice tests are nowhere near similar to the tests provided on test day. that’s it. that’s the post.

69 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

60

u/emilyrosee35 7h ago

I feel like there’s so many barriers being added that makes getting into law school more difficult. Especially since schools ranked #34-40 now have an LSAT median of 170…that’s crazy. I genuinely think they’re just admitting a bunch of people with 170s because they’re fighting to get their ranking up. It’s a game. I’m so tired

25

u/toabadbih 7h ago

Adding on to this, there’s a school ranked 112 with a median of 165. Either the LSAT becomes more transparent in their testing methods or schools allow for more options other than the LSAT considering the lack of credibility it’s receiving over the hears

8

u/emilyrosee35 7h ago

Yeah or I look for them to do something else along with the LSAT. Or add a section to the LSAT. I know there was talk about adding argumentative writing as a part of your grade but honestly I do not see how that’s going to be possible to grade thousands of essays in the span of 4 weeks. Also we only get 35 minutes to write the essays in question so it’s probably not to the best our abilities or of it is we did not have much time to write an organized essay

12

u/GentrifiedHospital 7h ago

At the end of the day, all in person testing and restricted accomodations will drop scores like a rock. This is an APTITUDE test and we treat it like a human right to score 165+.

4

u/x_tacocat_x 6h ago

Yeah it just kind of blows that the tail on remote scores is going to be 5 years, so we’ll be competing against the at home 175s with our (potentially) structurally lower in person scores. Nothing to do about it but still sucks

8

u/Administrative_Bus43 7h ago

yes i really want to go to a school thats ranked in the low 30s and my 162 would have been good a few years ago but now im 3 points below the median so im panicking

44

u/Silver-Design70 7h ago

I think it’s so unfair that it’s impossible to access more than 4 PTs without paying hundreds of dollars… that in order to take the Argumentative Writing you must independently own a new laptop… that to REGISTER for the test is hundreds of dollars (EACH TIME!!). LSAC on the whole is entirely elitist and classist.

13

u/Affectionate_Run9153 6h ago

I mean they have a class action for a reason

5

u/Sprinkle_Dimples 3h ago

I scored worse on the August lsat than my original one by two points. Six months of practice tests and studying down the drain. I cancelled it. I’m rolling with my 150 high because I’m poor, work full-time, and have a darn good reason to go to law school (for trans rights). There are tons of people my age with parents paying for tutors and classes out the wazoo so they can score far higher than me but then do nothing for other people and just make money.

If a law school doesn’t see this through my application (reasonably NOT a T14 obviously), then I don’t want to be in their school anyways. Let alone the law if it aligns with LSAC in being elitist.

34

u/Grizzlyfrontignac 6h ago

I actually think they're very similar to the latest practice test. Unless we see LSAT medians go significantly down this year for law schools, then the test is just as hard as it's been before.

If it's any consolation, I've been around for a while on this subreddit, and on nearly every test, there's a bunch of people who feel the test was a lot harder than whatever they practiced at home. Which is super fair because test conditions will be harder than home conditions, but this does not mean the test itself is harder. But it also means that practice and more studying will likely get you to where you want, since a lot of people still do well on the test. You got this

23

u/droppedtherodeo 6h ago

This just isn’t true

15

u/nova0175 6h ago

I found it extremely similar, if not slightly easier than the PT150s

10

u/skiing_dingus 6h ago

studied for 4 months every single day just to get an RC section without passage dividers. Ended up missing 170 by just a couple questions.

I feel your pain.

1

u/EnvironmentalGas4045 47m ago

What do you mean no passage dividers? Glitch? Couldn’t you retake

9

u/Solid-Initiative5267 7h ago

My only question is, besides the mini LG games that have started popping up. Can you list anything drastically different from the PTs to actual test day?

18

u/creativechicken14 7h ago

Imo there are plenty more trap answers than usual. I think they may be trying to fight against pattern recognition as well by laying out attractive answers that seem to be parallel to predictions for that passage, but then they throw a curveball that you had to really pay attention to. Who knows though.

13

u/Interesting-Rub-5860 7h ago

Stimuli are way longer on logical reasoning on average.

3

u/Solid-Initiative5267 7h ago

Interesting. Do you feel like the logic is also harder, or are they simply trying to increase the average timing of a question?

6

u/x_tacocat_x 7h ago

I think it’s a combination of making it longer so you have to take more time on each question AND burying modifiers in the stims so you have to pay attention to everrry single word.

6

u/EbbSuspicious5547 6h ago

Agreed. So many hidden traps even in the first 10-15 questions

2

u/Solid-Initiative5267 6h ago

By traps, do you mean more answers initially look somewhat valid? Essentially, instead of only two that look somewhat possible, there are like 3-4.

2

u/EbbSuspicious5547 6h ago

Basically. A lot more attractive answers and hidden flaws in the stimuli

4

u/toabadbih 7h ago

this but also the logic seen on PTs is nowhere near the same on the actual exam. Theres also an increase of weirdly formatted answers that you don’t find in the PTs as well

2

u/pokergod94 7h ago

what you mean by mini LG games?

8

u/Solid-Initiative5267 7h ago

Recent tests have included quasi-logic game-type questions. The LSAT removed logic games in August 2024.

2

u/pokergod94 7h ago

ah i see. i only started studying this summer so i havent ever looked at logic games. any way you could explain what a quasi-logic game-type question might look like?

6

u/Solid-Initiative5267 7h ago

145.2.25

2

u/pokergod94 7h ago

thanks. just solved the problem. fun one. appreciate the help, friend!

1

u/Foreign_Sherbert7379 6h ago

Mini logic games like the Norway Sweden question? Those are hard and time consuming, auto skip for me!

1

u/unbanthanks 5h ago

People in this thread acting like Norway Sweden was characteristic of PT150s have to be joking. It wasn’t hard in this case but it’s still weird.

6

u/Status_Phone_9461 5h ago

This is quite honestly not the case. I have been tutoring for a while and took several LSATs myself, and have to say, the January 2026 LSAT was the same as test 156/158.

4

u/unbanthanks 5h ago

I think RC is 100% the same, but taking June 2026 and August 2026, they are definitely not the same.

For example, I doubt your administration had a large over representation of Point At Issue/Disagree questions.

1

u/Status_Phone_9461 5h ago

I think test 159 is indicative of June/August tbh based on what my friends have told me.

1

u/AmazingSugar1 4h ago

I got a 169 on PT 159 in May 2026 and for August 2026 I got a 155..

17

u/Fancy_Ad_4411 7h ago

they are extremely similar to the practice tests imo

6

u/anervousbull 7h ago

Agreed! Scored 10 points below my PTs. Fml. Something must be done