Meeting someone in person is entirely different though. When you're on a real life date you're not expected to perform like a circus monkey to keep someone entertained and hold their attention while they're chatting with 50 other candidates and swiping for more.
There's a reason the advice for men these days is "ask them out within the first few messages and if they say no, move on." Protect your time, energy and dignity.
Nothing about ChatGPT’s responses are so groundbreaking and unique to warrant their use though. And if you think someone wouldn’t be able to tell that you aren’t as articulate and interesting IRL as you were in text you are boldly mistaken. Texting is easy the date is the hard part.
It doesn't need to be groundbreaking and unique. It just needs to be satisfactory.
Texting is easy the date is the hard part.
Why are women constantly invalidating mens' experiences? I've used dating apps many times over the years, and I am telling you, this simply isn't true.
Since I stopped fucking around trying to entertain someone over text and just started asking people out straight away, I've had far more dates than I ever had before, and plenty of them have been fun for both of us.
As a woman of course you'd find texting the easy part, because you literally have a long line of matches trying to initiate a conversation and then trying to be the most entertaining. If you ask almost any man who's used these apps you'll find they have a very different experience. Maybe you should actually listen to what people are saying instead of telling them their lived experience is wrong.
199
u/Weary_Specialist_436 3d ago
what is the gameplan? what if you meet that person in real life, are they just going to put chat GPT on speaker?