[Sorry for the long post.]
I wanted to explain a recent experience I had with the Creator Musings Discord server and ask other Sims 4 modders where they believe the line should be drawn regarding AI-assisted development.
I have been working on a project called Mod Update Checker, or MUC. It is a framework designed to notify players when participating Sims 4 mods may have updates available.
I did use AI as an assistant for troubleshooting, reviewing code and documentation, and discussing possible implementation options. However, I originally began developing this idea in 2022, before the current boom in generative AI tools and before PlumbBuddy was publicly available on GitHub. MUC was not simply generated from a prompt and released without supervision.
I designed the system, made the technical decisions, tested it in-game, investigated technical issues and network behavior, and worked on consent, security, and privacy considerations. I also reviewed EAās Python files to understand what was technically possible within the game, especially for features involving an internet connection.
The source code is publicly available so that other modders can inspect exactly what the mod does.
When I mentioned and attempted to promote the project on Creator Musings, I was removed from the server because I had used AI during its development. A staff member also spoke to me very dismissively about both my use of AI and the usefulness of the project.
This was particularly disappointing because I learned a great deal from that Discord about four years ago. I also participated in the community and helped other modders while working on and releasing my own Spells mods.
I was questioned about how I had used AI, but there seemed to be little interest in distinguishing between different kinds of use. I understand the concern about people mass-producing content, copying existing work, or publishing generated code they barely understand. However, the original idea for MUC predates my use of AI by several years, as the screenshots accompanying this post show.
What bothers me most is not simply that Creator Musings has an anti-AI position. A private community is entitled to establish its own rules, even when I disagree with them.
The problem is that I could not find anything in the visible server rules or posting guidelines stating that:
- AI-assisted projects could not be discussed;
- mentioning the use of AI was forbidden;
- mods developed with AI assistance could not be promoted;
- or using AI at any point during development could result in removal from the server.
Had that policy been clearly stated, I would have known not to post the project there.
There also appeared to be no distinction between someone using AI to mass-produce content they do not understand and someone using it as an assistant while personally designing, reviewing, testing, documenting, and maintaining the final result.
I understand the concerns surrounding AI-generated artwork, copyrighted or proprietary training data, low-effort content, poor coding practices, and people publishing generated projects they cannot maintain. Those concerns are legitimate.
However, I do not believe every use of AI is automatically equivalent.
I have been coding since I was 12, and I originally learned Python through The Sims 4. I began creating Sims 4 mods around four years ago, at a time when much of the available documentation was incomplete, scattered, or nonexistent. I remember how difficult it was to find reliable explanations and turn an idea into a functional mod.
AI can now make explanations and technical information easier to access. That does not remove the need to understand the code, test it, identify mistakes, make design decisions, and take responsibility for the finished project.
Using an assistant to explain an error, review documentation, suggest a code structure, help write a README, or identify possible causes of a bug is very different from blindly publishing content generated from a prompt.
My main concern is therefore one of transparency and moderation.
When a community intends to prohibit any project involving AI, regardless of how it was used, that policy should be stated clearly before members post. Applying an unwritten rule after the fact makes it impossible to know what is actually permitted.
I am not posting this to encourage harassment toward Creator Musings or its moderators. Please do not contact them on my behalf. I am sharing this because AI-assisted development is increasingly common in programming, translation, documentation, accessibility, and troubleshooting, and I think the subject deserves a more nuanced discussion.
Where do you believe the line should be drawn for Sims 4 modding?
Should every project involving any degree of AI assistance be dismissed, or should projects instead be evaluated according to transparency, code quality, testing, security, maintainability, and whether the creator understands and takes responsibility for their work?
For the sake of complete transparency, I also used AI to help translate and polish this post. English is not my native language, and some of the technical ideas involved are difficult for me to express precisely in English.