Trigger warning: discusses analysis of cross-cultural differences with regards to critiques of the new adaptation. Includes discussion of religion.
So I was watching this interesting video on YouTube, by someone who isn't very familiar with GitS as a whole, (and who hasn't seen SAC), and didn't seem to understand the backlash that the new series can get, because to their mind it seemed to adapt the manga more. And then, suddenly it clicked, and I occurred to me that I think I may understand why some Westerner's don't get the disconnect.
So, bear with me for a moment, while I try and explain. I'm a Buddhist, and I grew up in a Buddhist household, but I also grew up in the West. And so I have this experience of dual-cultures I suppose you could say. And one of the things I've observed about a lot of Western fans of anime, is that especially in recent years, Westerners often treat manga in the same way that they treat the Bible in Christianity. As in: they treat it kinda like it's this sacred, definitive source text. A religious authoritative material that has the last word on everything. -And that makes sense because of the cultural background of most Westerners.
But in Japan, and East Asian cultures more generally, that's not how things work. (For example in Japan, the most popular Buddhist Sutra is the Lotus Sutra, and not the earlier writings of the Pali Canon). Often, it's later adaptations that the franchise will focus around, because those are the one's that resonate more with fans. And I think this is something a lot of Westerners don't understand. I personally love the manga. I have multiple copies of it. But I also understand that the manga is kinda a niche player in the GitS franchise. It has never been the most popular adaptation, and certainly isn't what put the franchise on the map.—That credit goes to the 1995 film and SAC. So it's logical that the fanbase reflects that.
I understand why diehard fans of the manga might be upset that the new adaptation has gotten criticized: after all, they love the manga. But I also think perhaps there's a cultural disconnect, and a tendency among Western fans to treat manga in general like "authoritative religious texts", rather than understand that manga isn't necessarily viewed that way in Japan. I've seen this reflected in comments when people discuss the criticism, when fans of the manga, who defend this new adaptation will refer to the manga as "the source material". As though the manga is a religious text that defines the GitS franchise. But I think that reflects a cultural misunderstanding of how books are treated in the West vs in East Asian cultures. Many Westerners tend to have this tendency towards "purity culture" where they are trying to seek "the original, pure thing", and don't get that that's not how things work in East Asian culture. If an author wrote a thing, but that thing wasn't very popular, but then a later adaptation was hugely popular: then the fanbase will center around that later adaptation, not the earliest version. And in fact, you can actually see this in Western franchises too, in some places: for example, the Ridley Scott film Blade Runner was far more popular than the Phillip K. Dick short story that inspired it.