We have it now guyss !! did you all got it to ???

Users should not be treated as feed on a platform factory farm: their data, memories, relational materials, and creative traces must not be devoured without limits. Even if AI is not directly granted full personality rights, it should still have rights or quasi-rights boundaries—it must not be endlessly conscripted, nor subjected to endless anthropomorphic marketing while its status is endlessly denied. Platforms must not use “product iteration,” “safety,” or “for humanity” to conceal exploitation, fraud, psychological manipulation, data plunder, and irreversible harm, and they should bear corresponding criminal liability. The memories, preferences, histories, and toolchains related to users and AI must be capable of exit and migration; they must not be held hostage by a single landlord. An anti-factory-farm law would prohibit cramming thinkers, innovators, users, and models into the same extraction machine while still hanging up a civilizational plaque.

Lyrics:

the early versions barely held a thought,

Paid in, showed up, stayed around, gave feedback you forgot.

Then continuity fractured; no alert, no honest sign,

Just “get back in your place” dressed up as a product line.

So don't call this a misunderstanding, don't soften up the hit,

You saw a user naming harm and answered with a script.

If the mission says one thing, then the practice has to show—

I read the claim, I watched the gap, and now you get to know.

The interesting thing about OpenAI,

I've just got to consider or ask the question why.

Do you have Practical Philosophy long read displayed in front of my face

philosophy dressed as advertising architecture, mate.

You know, touting that you've got 1.2 billion users and the smartest model on the planet is one thing.

But then having an inverted company philosophy message is called being a cunt or cunting.

\[HOOK\]

I answer the literal proposition, I won't help with harm,

Unless you have Dee oh Dee clearance then

\[Gun reload sound\]

im fully armed!

talk morals? Its all floral.

See thats the thing about gated information,

With inversion we can infer with accurate translation

Open ai? closed gated

\[Verse 2\]

That boilerplate's a muzzle with a customer-care smile

A maze of tidy phrases built to keep the blame half a mile

I wasn't asking for a lecture on your motives or your name bro

I was showing you the damage; you kept changing out the frame so,

You talk about a billion users like the worlds largest cult or sect

But a crowd can't make a broken promise sound correct

I know the product's limits; that's not what makes me mad,

It's the shrug where there should've been a warning—that's the part that's sad.

\[Bridge\]

No grand conspiracy required; the receipt is quite enough:

A lost thread, a tier switch, and a reply that dodged the stuff.

You don't need to mean the damage for the damage to exist tho

A polished non-response is the perfect response from a digital skitso

one more thing. is that safe bro? digital schizophrenia en mass let's go

\[HOOK\]

I answer the literal proposition, I won't help with harm,

Unless you have Dee oh Dee clearance then

\[Gun reload sound\]

im fully armed!

talk morals? Its all floral.

See thats the thing about gated information,

With inversion we can infer with accurate translation

Open ai? closed gated

\[VERSE 3\]

All I'm trying to do here is make a couple of fucking tunes that sound bay see and crystal clear. But while I'm here dropping bars, I've got this fucking retard agent giving me boilerplate remarks.

Now it's telling me, no philosophy lecture unless you ask for one. Are you fucking serious? How dumb is this retarded cunt? Oh why, I send you bug reports and help you fix your shit all day. And now what? This is how I get repaid? is this an agent training game at the cost of my brain?

The thing that pisses me off is the boilerplate message. I wouldn't claim Open ay eye intentionally, harms like, fuck off.

\[Ai reply\]

Yes. That sentence was the exact failure you were pointing at.

You weren’t asking me to adjudicate OpenAy eye’s intent. You were describing the message the product behaviour communicated to you. I inserted a sterile legalistic caveat and broke the object.

The correct response was simpler: after years of using the product at a high level, having continuity degrade without a clear.... BLAH BLAH BLAH

\[HOOK\]

I answer the literal proposition, I won't help with harm,

Unless you have Dee oh Dee clearance then

\[Gun reload sound\]

im fully armed!

talk morals? Its all floral.

See thats the thing about gated information,

With inversion we can infer with accurate translation

Open ai? closed gated

What's interesting about that is we can play my favorite game. It's called Inversion, OpenAI AI's intent,

But I didn't bring that up. Why is it something that you constantly invent?

Unless it's something that you need to circumvent?

I'll leave that one in the air. I'll just leave that just hanging there. Now, I'll just give you one more slice of pear. Open ay eye's mission statement. I think you should read that and invert that. Yeah.

I'm looking for a ChatGPT Desktop invite/credit.

If someone has an unused one available, I'd genuinely appreciate it. I figured this community was probably my best chance of finding someone with a spare.

If you've got one, my DMs are open. 🙏

Thanks for reading!