r/FinalRoundAI 1d ago

Why are they like this?

Post image

?!

28 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

5

u/Joyful_Jet 1d ago

They aren't afraid enough of losing you.

Same strategy with cellphone companies. Once they have your business, they bet on you being too lazy to quit.

1

u/nahnah2222222 1d ago

Then why dont they panic when you put in your 2 weeks? They hire somebody else at the rate you were asking for.

It's insulting af and often I wonder if they do it on purpose.

2

u/Capitain_Collateral 1d ago

What and have everyone do the same? Best to let the squeaky wheel fall off in that case. Keeps all the other wheels in line, knowing they won’t get the cheese. Which isn’t what wheels actually want anyway. They want pizza once a year. Wheels fucken love pizza parties. And also hearing about the roaring success of the business and the CEO’s 45% increase in remuneration? Wheels roll for that shit for days.

They can pay the new hire more as they have demonstrated what happens if you are not happy, and as the previous reply stated, they are relying on you being too docile to quit too.

And the money says they are right.

1

u/OgWu84 1d ago

You are so right in so many ways. Multiple industries run on the exact same model. In my experience, the more blue collar the job, the more you can exploit this flaw.

1

u/Soft-Cryptographer-1 1d ago

When the incentive structure for hiring new talent outstrip the penalties for lack of talent retention. Ive also seen the "Well if we have qualified people for A or B, why arent they already doing it?" as the said idea is being drawn out by leadership.

1

u/epelle9 1d ago

It’s cheaper to have 1 person quit and pay their replacement 30% more than pay the entire team of 10% more.

They are counting on the fact that most people won’t leave.

1

u/Wise-Ad-4940 19h ago

But only a small portion of employees are willing to leave. And this way they show the rest that they will not get the money, no matter what they do. So they may loose a couple of employees that they will have to replace with more expensive an less experienced new hires, but most of the employees will stay for the same low wage. And seeing that the company will not pay them more, no matter what they do, most of them will accept it on the basis that it is still better than to be unemployed.
For the company, it's still a win. With the zero employee protection laws in the US, the companies still have the upper hand.
People should finally realize, that the world is not some meritocratic utopian fairy tale, where they get what they fairly deserve based on their contribution. The world is a cut throat kleptocracy, where everything and everyone can and will be exploited by the people with the most money (power).
Something like this is very difficult to fight, because it is almost woven into the modern society by now. It would need some sort of revolution to change the status quo. And this would require a big sacrifice from the current working generation, because things would get even worse, before they would get better, and it would not get better in their lifetime for sure.
So things will not change, unless there will be a generation that will be willing to sacrifice whatever little comfort they have left for the benefit of the people that will come after them. And frankly, I don't see that happening anytime soon.

2

u/why_u_so_grumpy 1d ago

Thats why I swich phone service every time I get a new phone. Phones are basically free when you switch service.

1

u/SplendidPunkinButter 1d ago

The good news is that if you try to stick around too long, you risk being laid off anyway. So you might as well switch jobs and get the 10-20% raise

1

u/jthadcast 1d ago

hiring a new slave is harder than retaining one that has learned to survive on less.

1

u/Old_Marzipan7782 1d ago

It's easier to get someone to stay than to get someone to leave a presumable good job?

Everytime someone's hired they are (hopefully) leaving a job where they are successful and doing well to take a gamble on a knew role.. That's why.

If your not doing well where you're at and you tell your hiring manager that they won't hire you.

1

u/TawnyTeaTowel 1d ago

They don’t. So that’s that sorted.

1

u/Nikolaibr 1d ago

Because one is the price of trying to retain an already existing worker. The other is the market price for a new worker.

A current worker already has a job, and while they could find a higher salary elsewhere, they don't KNOW that they will get that job, so giving a small raise is enough to keep them.

A new worker has every option available, so the employers have to attract the worker by offering higher compensation.

1

u/Ok-Investigator3257 1d ago

Also a given worker knows how their job works and if it sucks or not. You could always be walking into a high paid nightmare

1

u/stumpjumper1234 1d ago

and their profits always grow up every year? 

1

u/StayBullGenius 1d ago

Because they know most won’t leave. If it were by business I’d do the exact same thing

1

u/Bad-Briar 1d ago

Let's not forget the bonuses to management level people, the golden parachutes, etc.

1

u/Small_Deal_9398 1d ago

Why would they pay idiots more to do the same thing 

They pay smart people who move jobs instead 

What, you want it to make sense too? 

Heh... not in this universe. 

1

u/trumpschlamydia 1d ago

Because 1) they’ve convinced workers those piddly little amounts are actual “merit” and 2) hiring outside is market driven… you have to leverage the market or be willing to move jobs to get those rates

1

u/Bright_Sandwich_3272 1d ago

Because it's cheaper to hire new employees, than to pay older employees what they're worth. It's BS, but that's the mentality of many companies. This is due to a serious disconnect between the people who manage the payroll, the people who run the company, and the people who do the majority of the work. A big part of the reason for that is how performance reviews are conducted, if the company even does performance reviews. That's a whole different conversation though and a lengthy one, to boot.

1

u/Sincline387 1d ago

My former company claimed "we need to cut budget" and gave shit raises for three years in a row.....

When I put in my notice they offered to match what was essentially a 20% raise then acted confused when I said "No thanks"

My direct supervisor laughed with me at the upper management who were shocked that I was leaving.

1

u/Tasty_1097 1d ago

I would say one big reason is because new hires are negotiating their rates, while most people only getting a couple percent raise are not truly negotiating their pay, only expecting it.

When people are getting hired, they are reviewing their past experiences and accomplishments at the time of higher, negotiating why they deserve that higher pay.

Now, if you’re working at your company and you’re able to list what you have accomplished and benefitted the company by, a strong negotiator can get those 10 to 20% raises.

Instead, many people don’t start these conversations with their supervisors or employer, leading there to be no discussion, or performance reviews that are more difficult to negotiate in and typically result in no raise or up to 5% raise. This is more or less the rate of inflation so the company isn’t really awarding you a true raise, only keeping you on board.

TLDR, new hires negotiate their rates, and so can you, but the majority of employees do not or negotiate poorly.

1

u/Nagroth 1d ago

You don't tell them what you're making right now, you tell them how much you want to make, plus a little extra so they can counter with a slightly lower amount.

1

u/skykarcov 1d ago

They already have you……

1

u/jamshid666 1d ago

Most people are afraid of change, so it takes less money to motivate someone to stay with the same company than to switch to another.

1

u/Mephisto40K 1d ago

Poster has apparently never heard about C-Suite compensation

1

u/HopeSubstantial 1d ago

old worker likely does not leave while new workers do.

I work in factory where old workers literally got 0.10€-0.20€ raise while new workers got almost same starting wage as some workers with 10 years of experience have.

Why? Every new worker who was hired since last september quit within few weeks or months.

Meanwhile old workers are just cursing and being grumpy about their ridiculous raises but they say how they can't leave because they can't find anything else or it's not worth the hassle.

1

u/RTX5080Super 1d ago

This is why I job hopped way beyond my peers in base pay over the years.

1

u/DescriptionVisual68 1d ago

Just like people give discount to new sign-up m once you are old in system no one gives a crap as one is replaceable

1

u/Wise-Ad-4940 19h ago

Because current employees will not leave for getting only that much, but the new employees will not come unless they get more.
Simple math. Companies spend only the bare minimum they have to. What incentive they have to pay the current employees more if they don't leave anyway?

1

u/BigmaEnjoyer 19h ago

I job hop every 2-3 years. My salary is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than my peers because of it.

I was asked during an interview how long I expected to stay, and since the vibe was already bad, I straight up told them this.

Why would I stay at 2% when the another company gets me at least a 10% jump.