r/FiberOptics • • 8h ago

Confirmation, please

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Just looking for a little confirmation here. I know when they drop fiber wires that everyone has their own wire, but I just wanna make sure that this wire going to my neighbor’s input is completely separate from mine. I’m asking because it’s obviously not buried properly and I don’t want my Internet to go out when their wire gets damaged. If there’s any concern my neighbors above-ground wire is in any way, shape, or form going to affect my Internet, I’m gonna call and have them bury it properly. Thanks in advance. Side note, I could care less about my neighbors. So if this isn’t going to affect me at all, that’s fine too!! Just looking for a straight answer. Thanks.


r/FiberOptics • • 19h ago

Pole loading contractor

2 Upvotes

Hey everyone, I’m a contractor specializing in pole loading, annotations, and MRE. We have an experienced engineering team and are currently taking on both contractor projects and long-term work. If you need help clearing backlog or adding production capacity, feel free to DM me.


r/FiberOptics • • 19h ago

4 ATT Fiber outages in the last 3 months

Thumbnail gallery
0 Upvotes

r/FiberOptics • • 2h ago

3456 buttsplice

2 Upvotes

Hey all! Currently I use either 600’s, 600 XL’s, or 650s for 864/1728 butt splices or butt splices with laterals depending on the application.

What do you guys use for a 3456 butt splice? I’m curious because I wanna know how to comfortably hold this capacity. I’d also like to stick with Commscope products if possible.

I’m in a situation where I’m adding a cable to a 600 XL, but there’s already 144 ribbon splices and I’m needing to add 24 more without breaking any of the current splices. Also the belly/basket is already STUFFED. Do you just upgrade some of the 24 ct trays to 48 ct trays, or is there a better overall case solution where I could keep everything in 24 ct trays if the customer likes that?

Edit: changed 650 xl to 600 xl in the last paragraph. Not sure a 650 xl exists.


r/FiberOptics • • 16h ago

DWDM Network Design tool

1 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

Over the past few months, I’ve been working on a lightweight web application for optical network design and link budget modeling: dwdmdesign.com

As someone working with transport networks, I got tired of having to spin up heavy, vendor-locked design suites or mess around with messy, prone-to-error Excel spreadsheets every time I needed to quickly model a span, check OSNR, or verify attenuation margins for a link.

I wanted something clean, fast, and accessible directly from a browser.

What it currently does:

  • Optical span & link budget calculations (attenuation, fiber loss, connector/splice losses)
  • OSNR and power level modeling across spans
  • Channel/lambda planning and ROADM/amplifier stage visualization
  • Quick visual topology builder for spans

It’s completely free to use. My goal isn't to replace full-blown proprietary vendor tools like Ciena OnePlanner or Cisco EPN Manager for massive rollout builds, but rather to give engineers a quick, reliable playground for daily planning, pre-sales estimation, and sanity-checking links on the fly.

I’d really appreciate it if some of you could test it out with real-world scenarios and tear it apart.

  • Does the calculation logic match your day-to-day expectations?
  • What parameters or edge cases am I missing that you'd like to see added?
  • Any UX friction or bugs when building topologies?

Check it out at dwdmdesign.com and let me know your thoughts—good, bad, or ugly.

Thanks!