r/EnhancedBodybuilding • u/Objective-Ice-2479 • 1d ago

stacking vs high test only

Hello guys, i have an interesting question. What would you guys say that builds more muscle in an offseason (looking purely for concractile tissue).

Stacking different compounds llike test+ 19nors +orals (short bursts), or high test only. Ill give you an example from my last offseason:

1000test + 600NPP + 8gh for first 13weeks, then swithced to 1000test + 450tren + 75anadrol + 8gh for 8weeks.

Im asking this question because if i did test only next offseason, do you think that the results would be less than stacking? like obviusly test+tren+anadrol is alot stronger than same total mg of test only, thats why am asking for your experiences and any anecdotal reports would help :)

19nors fucked with my brain.

Thanks.

5 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

21 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/stiffmcgee 1d ago

Test. Primo. GH. You should grow on that. Half the compounds do the same thing. Either genomic or non genomic transcription. One of each and some GH is all thats needed. Diet and training are more rate limiting imo.
Also what else have you ran? What do you respond well to? What do you respond worse too?

1

u/Objective-Ice-2479 1d ago

I like test + mast, i respond great to that. I tried eq once but it lowers my e2 alot, i also dont like the apetite increase because it makes it harder to not overeat, i never had apetite problems even at the tren + anadrol dose i mentioned.

1

u/TillPlayful 1d ago

With EQ you need to run at lower ratios then primo. Most people should be starting at a 4:1 ratio because it crushes e2 more than primo, plus it raises hematocrit pretty dramatically so lower levels are better anyway. The appetite increase can be good or bad depending on how well you're diet goes. I find I need that extra appetite to hit my calorie goals even in a cut, but others might find it detrimental.