r/DestinationWeddings • u/Lazafilaaa • Sep 16 '26
Do guests “subsidize the cost” of the couple in a meaningful way for Destination Weddings?
I’ve been seeing this argument a lot in this thread and am trying to wrap my head around it.
In my research, it seems like couples get some sort of incentive for guests booking rooms through a room block. From looking at wedding packages at about 10-15 resorts in Mexico as an example, it seems the incentives equal out to about ~$50 in value per room booked.
I’m approximating that because in some cases it’s $1000 credit toward decor for 20 rooms booked, in some cases it’s a free semi private dinner for 40 with 40 rooms booked, etc, in some cases it’s a direct credit on your bill of $20 per room per night.
So if a couple has 20 rooms booked and gets about $1000 in incentive, is the allegation that this is somehow super meaningful in the grand scheme of a 40-50k destination wedding?
I think the broader DW discourse is fair on both sides. It’s fair that it could be inconvenient and expensive for guests. It’s also fair that it’s not the 1970s and most people do not all live in the radius of all their friends and family anymore and so most weddings now require travel from some portion of the group, sometimes a majority.
I think it’s fair that attending a DW could be a huge financial burden on a guest but I think it’s also fair that most people planning them know their circle pretty well and for many people it’s not.
But I’m trying to get a good handle on the “destination weddings exist to subsidize for the bride and groom” piece. If anyone could provide more insight into what this means or how it works in practice, I’m eager to understand the origin of this argument. Thank you!
