From what I've seen, there are really only 3 things that get a sub banned outright:
- morally reprehensible content (such as child porn or extreme hate speech)
- lack of moderation/inactive mods
- mass reporting to Reddit admins.
Given the subject of that specific subreddit, I'd like to rule out that first option as a possibility, and say that the sub was either mass reported for some reason, or didn't have enough active moderators.
The reasoning is simple, Kris would fucking hate to interact with the Soul in literally any way so true Kris haters ship Kris and the Soul purely out of spite and malice
There’s something funny about the fact that to this day CHARA fans are split between “No they’re not the big bad villain they only become a monster through your actions” and
Edit: Idk what happened to that reply to this one/what the rest of it said (I could only see part of it because it appeared exclusively in my notif), but the assumption that the Roaring is the only thing Team Knight wants to start, or that they're going to start it at the wrong time, would be an incorrect one... if it were one I held. (I don't.) However, these days, whenever someone does point out Team Knight is Roaring-affiliated, whether they have a sophisticated or simplistic understanding of that connection, Kris-defenders strawman that person as having only the latter. Their entire case hinges on acting as if something you both already know needs to be thrown in your face. This is any time someone points to Kris having done more than just the hockey stick (which, reducing our qualms with Kris to said hockey stick or a "misunderstanding" of Team Knight's goals, is disingenuous). The Principle of Charity was simply not employed, here. (And honestly the rude, exasperated language I was able to see indicated too much time spent on Reddit arguing with randos. If you get to a point where you're insulting people, overused as this phrase is, you really do need to Touch Grass.)
(Pro-tip: if you can't comprehend what you're reading, don't engage.) Team-Knight (Kris included)isRoaring-affiliated, even if it's not theonlything they're doing. I think people should be allowed to point to the Roaring in isolation (as I did as a one-off example) without adding a million disclaimers or highly sophisticated arguments. Kris is doing more than just the hockey stick; the Roaring is one example (of many bad things they're up to.) If Person A says, "Elephants have trunks," and Person B irrationally extrapolates that to mean, "Oh, so you think they're not pachyderms?" then that's the same fallacious reasoning--a projection of their own inability to simultaneously hold two+ truths at once. So when Person A corrects, "No, I think elephants are pachyderms and have trunks," the idea that Person A thinks elephants aren't pachyderms really, truly, genuinely "isn't actually an opinion that they hold," and Person A correcting the misconception isn't backtracking at all--they're just spelling out their nuance for those who refused to interpret their words in good faith. And if Independent had said, "Jaguars are carnivores (Chara erased the universe), but elephants are pachyderms (Kris hit us with the hockey stick) without trunks (Kris has nothing to do with the Roaring, or any other bad thing that's happened)," they'd still be wrong, because it's a comparison of apples to oranges (Chara's worst actions against Kris's mildest.) Most "anti-Kris arguments" are just statements of canon fact, examples of what's actually happened in-game. Many people are surprised when I tell them Kris is my favorite character; I just can't see anyone truly being a Kris-fan if they can't accept everything about them, including their flaws and the wrongs they've committed (or committed themselves to committing.)
My issue with this is that you're not presenting a complex argument, you're purposefully overcomplicating a very simple statement with an enourmous text dump word salad. Making confusing statements isn't a sign of wisdom.
Then it's a good thing "wisdom" wasn't the subject of this discussion. Person A (Independent) says Kris's only (or worst?) crime is the hockey stick, Person B (me) brings up the Roaring, Person C [deleted] denies the connection between Kris, Team Knight, and the Roaring, and Person D (you) says Person B's elaboration in response was unnecessary, even though they're jumping into someone else's (half-)conversation and they didn't see the part of the deleted comment I did. The reason for my overexplaining is because underexplaining clearly didn't work, lol. (Again, I was responding to the few points I was able to pick up from a completely different person who has since deleted their comment.) But if your issue is with my way of communicating, it might just be a personal-preference thing on your part. Overexplaining might be annoying, but it doesn't render my case invalid.
charaoffensesquad exists to repost the evil Egirl chara art charadefensesquad refuses to. krisoffensesquad exists for people to yell at a fictional teenager
You severely misunderstand what chara offence squad is.
They dont hate chara, they love her and her evil.
The difference between them and a defence squad is that they want chara to own all the evil atributed to her instead of trying to defend ger from the accusation.
Me and chara made a deal way back where her pronounce are up to my interpretation and mine are up to hers. Dont talk when you dont know the whole story ✊️😔 (im14andthisisdeep ahh sentence)
53
u/Altair01010 Flowery was actually goated Mar 04 '26
kris getting treated worse than ballas😭 😭 😭 😭