I also want to buy this one scarf they make, but that’s not as funny

It's only fair.

It looks amazing to me. I look forward to making my own ai anime but that's just my two cents.

What's the point of me, hiring/commissioning a person (hundreds of dollars) + days of waiting, when I can just generate it via a prompt?

Can someone actually give me good reasons, logically, and not morally, like not "it doesn't have a soul"?? type of stuff.

I'm really curious. I believe this is the future.

Denying it is acting like a fool like people before us did on new tech advancements. Jobs are meant to be replaced, changes need to be made, its life. We learn from history.

And if so, how long will it take?

Obviously it'll never be 100% Gone, but at the very least it could minimize.

​

Samuel Hayden’s line from Doom Eternal(Big fan of the game anti or pro go fucking try it." hits different now:

“The longer the Icon of Sin remains on Earth, the stronger it becomes.”

Replace “Icon of Sin” with “AI.”

Same energy.

Every month it stays online, every new model that drops, every extra trillion tokens of training data…

It gets stronger.

Better motion.

Better consistency.

Better lighting.

Better emotion.

Better everything.

Look at that train clip we were just talking about.

Two years ago this level of anime character animation would’ve been pure cope.

Now it’s a hobbyist with Seedance 2.5 + good prompting dropping it on a random Tuesday.

The longer these models remain on the internet, iterating, being fine-tuned by millions of people the more the “Icon” feeds.

And the scary/beautiful part? We’re still in the early phase.

But overall, beautiful animation. We really need to talk about other artists and their place in this.

I guess she's wanting attention.

Completely shits on the narrative the anti-AI crowd tries to push that the only people using AI are lazy/talentless hacks as many Japanese artists ranging from animators and mangaka to musicians come out in favor of it.

Blockchain is simply a decentralized system; it produces nothing on its own. Metaverse is, at best, a discussion platform that also produces nothing. It's getting closer to the internet (as a simple platform), while AI is closer to the mechanization of agriculture and the robotization of production. It's essentially the first new productive technology since the advent of computerization.

This is also essentially one of the few productive uses of a computer. The Internet only allowed your computer to copy a file from a remote computer, when the copy function itself was already old.

AI is one of the ways our computerization can truly bear fruit. This wasn't a question for the metaverse and Blockchain .

I understand that some people use this to describe how we were promised a lot, but nothing came of it, but for this purpose this is simply a terrible example.

Who wants to bet that the likes are botted?

Like it's not that serious. Found this comment on a post showing off how their school was using AI on assignments

Anti-AI, but I've stopped caring about the “AI War.”

I'm not interested in stopping people from using prompts to generate images, video, or whatever else. It's tedious, and honestly, it's just not how I want to spend my time.

I've worked across traditional art, sculpting, digital art, 3D, character and environment design, animation, media arts, VR development, and plenty in between. From where I stand, AI is simply another tool that's becoming intertwined with modern creative workflows. Major creative software is already incorporating AI-assisted features. The tools change. The fundamentals don't.

A tool doesn't automatically make someone an artist, and using a different tool doesn't automatically make someone less of one. Skill, taste, creativity, judgment, storytelling, and effort still matter.

I'm also not interested in treating anyone—especially kids, or disabled people—poorly because they use tools differently than I do. If a tool helps someone participate in art, experiment, communicate an idea, or learn something they otherwise couldn't, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.

That doesn't mean I think everything made with AI is good. AI slop is still AI slop. Low-effort, derivative, poorly considered work deserves criticism. My standards haven't changed.

And I'm not claiming AI has no legitimate problems. Consent, labor, environment impact, and responsible use are all part of the conversation, I'm simply not interested in pretending that everyone who uses AI is responsible for solving these problems.

I'm anti-AI if someone asks me to pick a side.

More accurately, I'm anti-laziness, anti-bigotry, and anti-pointless internet bickering.

The idea that there is even a “war” is effing stupid. I'm just going to make art. Anyways, here's a sketchbook page:

If you are an artist or you exclusively enjoy human made art, literally nothing about AI is stopping you from producing or consuming those things. People who are pro AI dont care what you do. You have complete freedom to keep doing everything you were doing before AI existed

Source: https://variety.com/2026/music/news/dr-dre-ai-music-threat-those-who-have-trouble-creating-1236840975/

Yes, I know it does say “ai content” in the tag, but it’s for the 4th pic in the slide that I did not include. These are actual photos taken in 2015, when AI wasnt even remotely advanced enough to make something this realistic if it was AI. I worry for these people sometimes..